Regulatory Division (File No. MVP-2016-01714-LSP)
Page 3 of 4
Clean Water Act (33 U.S. Code 1341 (a)(1)). The MPCA has indicated that if, at a later date, it
makes a preliminary anti-degradation determination regarding Section 401 Water Quality
Certification, it will at that time plan to issue an additional public notice under Minnesota Rules
Part 7001.
Any comments relative to MPCA’s Section 401 Certification for the activity proposed in this
public notice may be sent to:
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Resource Management and Assistance Division
Attention: 401 Certification
520 Lafayette Road North
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-4194
6. HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL
This public notice is being sent to the National Park Service and the State Archaeologist for their
comments. The Corps will review information on known cultural resources and/or historic
properties within and adjacent to the project area. The Corps will also consider the potential
effects of the project on any properties that have yet to be identified. The results of this review
and the Corps’ determination of effect will be coordinated with the State Historic Preservation
Officer independent of this public notice. Any adverse effects on historic properties will be
resolved prior to the Corps authorization, or approval, of the work in connection with this project.
7. PUBLIC HEARING REQUESTS
Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a
public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, in
detail, the reasons for holding a public hearing. A request may be denied if substantive reasons
for holding a hearing are not provided or if there is otherwise no valid interest to be served.
8. PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact,
including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will
reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The
benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced
against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal
will be considered, including the cumulative effects. Among those are conservation, economics,
aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values,
flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion,
recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber
production and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. Environmental and other
documents will be available for review in the St. Paul District Office.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State, and local
agencies and officials; Indian tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and
evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by
the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition, or deny a permit for
this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered
species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public