e death penalty is a denial of the most basic hu-
man rights; it violates one of the most fundamental
principles under widely accepted human rights
law—that states must recognize the right to life. e
UN General Assembly, the representative body of
recognized States, has called for an end to the death
penalty and human rights organizations agree that its
imposition breaches fundamental enshrined human
rights norms. Convention is quickly moving towards
a position in support of worldwide abolition.
e Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to
advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by
the Universal Declaration of Human Right (UDHR),
which the U.S. helped dra in the aermath of World
War II and adopted in 1948. Under Article 3 of the
UDHR, life is a human right. is makes the death
penalty our most fundamental human rights viola-
tion. As long as governments have the right to extin-
guish lives, they maintain the power to deny access to
every other right enumerated in the Declaration. is
rst most central right provides the foundation upon
which all other rights rest.
e starting and ending point for a human rights
based analysis must be that the death penalty is
never consistent with fundamental human rights
principles. In addition to the right to life, other basic
rights are oen breached in its application. e death
penalty has been found to breach the prohibition
against cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment and
there has also been a growing consensus that “death
row phenomenon” constitutes a breach in violation
of the prohibition against torture under international
human rights law. Moreover, the death penalty is of-
ten applied in a discriminatory manner, in violation
of the principle of non-discrimination.
In many parts of the world, the death penalty is now
generally understood to be a human rights violation.
is understanding has led to progress in the aboli-
tion of the death penalty worldwide; thirty-ve years
ago, only 16 countries had put an end to capital pun-
ishment for all crimes while today the number stands
at 104. Moreover, of those that still have laws on
the books, 35 are abolitionist in practice—meaning
they have not executed anyone in at least 10 years.
In 2010, only 23 countries were known to have car-
ried out executions. Every year, most of the world’s
executions take place in only a few countries, and
the United States is among those frequent execution-
ers. From 2007 to 2011, the United States executed
220 people. In fact, our frequency of executions is
matched only by Saudi Arabia, Yemen, North Korea,
Iran, and China.
The Importance of Recognizing the Death
Penalty as a Human Rights Violation
Examining the death penalty from a human rights
perspective not only highlights the impact of deny-
ing the most basic right on all other rights but also
demonstrates why the only “solution” to the death
penalty is to permanently end its use. If the injustices
and practicalities associated with capital punish-
ment could somehow be erased—the costs cut, the
racial and class biases removed, and all possibilities
for “error” eliminated–the government still cannot
do it because it violates fundamental human rights.
A human rights based approach does not take issue
with the accuracy, technique, or timeliness of an
execution. It provides a strict standard with which to
say simply and unequivocally—the death penalty is
wrong.
In addition to the clear categorization of a human
rights approach, such approach also oers account-
ability and access to the international community. A
Center for Constitutional Rights, 666 Broadway, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10012
email [email protected] • www.CCRjustice.org
The Death Penalty is a Human Rights Violation:
An Examination of the Death Penalty in the U.S. from a Human Rights Perspective
human rights approach obligates duty bearers (usu-
ally States) to: 1) respect; 2) protect; and 3) fulll
human rights. In the context of the death penalty,
this means not depriving the fundamental human
rights—such as life—of those sentenced to crimes;
taking positive steps to ensure the human rights of
the accused and sentenced; and adopting national
legislation to achieve full realization of the rights of
these individuals.
On October 10, 2011, CCR joined the world in com-
memorating the 9th Annual World Day Against the
Death Penalty, by issuing a position paper entitled,
e US Tortures Before it Kills: An Examination of the
Death Row Experience from a Human Rights Perspec-
tive, which analyzes life on death row—including
decades in solitary connement with limited human
contact, and the intolerable process of repeatedly
coming within hours of execution—as torture under
international human rights law. According to the
Convention Against Torture (CAT), a treaty rati-
ed by the US in 1994, torture is dened, in part, as
“any act by which severe pain or suering, whether
physical or mental, is inicted on a person for such
purposes as […] punishing him for an act he […] has
committed or is suspected of having committed.”
Torture is a crime against humanity, a war crime, and
a violation of the Geneva Conventions, as reected
in the statutes of the International Criminal Court,
the International Criminal Tribunal for the former
Yugoslavia, and the International Criminal Tribunal
for Rwanda, among other judicial authorities. Over
the last 15 years, a substantial body of law has de-
veloped that sets forth the elements of torture under
customary international law, which largely reects
the denition of torture under the CAT. Torture has
been found to be “a violation of personal dignity and
is used for such purposes as intimidation, degrada-
tion, humiliation and discrimination, punishment,
control or destruction of a person.”
It has been shown that humans experience isolation
as torture. Decades in isolation without access to
family, other prisoners, programming, or any other
form of intellectual or social stimulation, along
with the constant knowledge of one’s impending,
but uncertain death, combine to create the death
row phenomenon. e UN Special Rapporteur on
Torture, Juan Méndez, has recently called for the
prohibition of solitary connement and in August
2011 issued a report on this practice amounting to
torture.
The Death Penalty in the United States
In addition to violating the right to life, critics have
argued that capital punishment, as it is applied in the
United States, is expensive, racist, arbitrary, and fal-
lible. Further, the deterrent eect of the death pen-
alty has never been proven. Decades of experience
have conrmed that capital punishment in the US is
not only a fundamental human rights violation, but
is also fundamentally awed in design and imple-
mentation. Additionally, prisoners in the US spend
decades on death row in dehumanizing conditions
which amount to torture under international law.
Legally putting people to death has not been a con-
stant practice in the United States; from 1967-1977
executions were halted across the US. However, cur-
rently, approximately 3,300 people still await execu-
tion in the United States. 34 states are still retention-
ist, meaning they have death penalty laws on the
books.
People of color have accounted for a disproportion-
ate 43% of total executions since 1976 and 55% of
those currently awaiting execution—while they only
account for approximately 27% of the general popu-
lation. e death penalty, as applied, has been found
to violate the non-discrimination requirement found
in international human rights law. Two treaties which
the U.S. has ratied, the International Convention
on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimi-
nation (ICERD) and the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) ensure the right to
non-discrimination. In 2006, the UN Human Rights
Committee recommended that the U.S. “assess the
extent to which [the] death penalty is disproportion-
ately imposed on ethnic minorities and on low-
income population groups, as well as the reasons for
this, and adopt all appropriate measures to address
the problem.”
Center for Constitutional Rights, 666 Broadway, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10012
email [email protected] • www.CCRjustice.org
In the last decade, some progress has been made
against the death penalty in the US, yet there is still
much to be done.
In the 2002 Atkins v. Virginia Supreme Court deci-
sion, the court found that executing the mentally
disabled constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.
is decision, however, has le it to the states to
determine how to apply this constitutional restric-
tion, resulting in a standard in some states that is
hard to meet, and thus, results in the ongoing prac-
tice of executing the mentally ill. As a result, the US
continues to violate international human rights law
(CAT and the ICCPR) in this respect, despite the
fact that the UN Commission on Human Rights
has called for states to refrain from executing any-
one with “any form of mental disorder.”
In 2005, the Supreme Court overturned the ju-
venile death penalty in Roper v. Simmons. In this
case, the Court cited international human rights
law in their decision, including the ICCPR and
the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child
(CRC), which prohibits the imposition of capital
punishment on persons below 18 years of age. e
CRC, ratied by 193 countries, is the most widely
accepted human rights treaty in history. e U.S. is
one of only three countries which have not ratied
the CRC; the others are Somalia and South Sudan.
Some states have made progress recently with pass-
ing legislation abolishing the death penalty. Illinois
is the most recent state to abolish the death penalty
(2011). In other states, there have been executive
decisions to stop executions. For example, on No-
vember 11, 2011 the Governor of Oregon put a stay
on executions “[b]oth because of [his] own deep
personal convictions about capital punishment and
also because in practice, Oregon has an expensive
and unworkable system that fails to meet basic
standards of justice.”
On September 28, 2011, charges were brought in the
rst death penalty case that will be tried at the US
military commissions at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.
ese military commissions are unlawful, unconsti-
tutional, and a perversion of justice. Seeking to ex-
ecute people based on a system that allows evidence
obtained through torture, secrecy, hearsay evidence,
and has considerably low standards for proving guilt
is not only illegal, but also morally reprehensible.
Even outside the military commission system, the
frequent exonerations of convicted and condemned
prisoners proves that the US judicial system will
never be mistake free.
We must once and for all demand a worldwide end
to the death penalty. is violation of the most basic
of rights shames us all, and impacts many more than
the individuals on death row. Family members and
friends are forced to live with and bear this torture
along with their imprisoned loved ones, and all of
us are irrevocably impacted by this practice that is
carried out in our names by our government. Please
join CCR and the global community in condemn-
ing the death penalty and the conditions that reduce
those sentenced to death to lives that no human be-
ing should endure. e death penalty diminishes the
humanity of everyone it touches; let us rearm our
commitment to human rights and reassert our com-
mon humanity by demanding that our government
stop killing our fellow human beings.
e experience of American death row inmates
ts the international legal denition of torture:
Among the approximately 3,250 prisoners on
death row in the US, the vast majority will
serve years in solitary and crippling conditions,
awaiting execution.
Of the 34 states that still kill people, at least 25
hold death row inmates in solitary conne-
ment for 23 hours or more a day.
Of the 52 people executed in the US in 2009,
the average length of time on death row was
169 months – over 14 years.
Contact with family members is minimal: 17
out of 34 states do not allow prisoners any
physical contact with family or friends for the
duration of their time on death row, other than
the weeks leading up to execution.
Sensory deprivation is prevalent.
Center for Constitutional Rights, 666 Broadway, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10012
email [email protected] • www.CCRjustice.org
More Information
CCR attorney Rachel Meeropol expounds on the inhumanity of the death penalty and death row
in this video and has authored an opinion piece in Guardian US.
For some general facts and statistics about the Death Penalty in the US, see this Factsheet by the
Death Penalty Information Center: http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/documents/FactSheet.pdf
e International Justice project’s list of Reported Foreign Nationals on Death Row in the US:
http://www.internationaljusticeproject.org/nationalsStats.cfm?print=yes
Take Action
Urge the US to abolish the Death Penalty and ratify the Second Optional Protocol to the Inter-
national Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - http://www.change.org/petitions/ratify-second-
optional-protocol-to-the-international-covenant-on-civil-and-political-rights
Sign the petition against the death penalty for the December 2012 vote of the United Nations
General Assembly on a moratorium on the use of the death penalty: http://www.worldcoalition.
org/Petition.html
To take action in your State, go to: http://www.aclu.org/maps/we-are-all-troy-davis-end-death-
penalty
If you live in a state that still has the death penalty, take action by sending an op-ed to your local
paper. (You can nd specic info to include about your state here: http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.
org/state_by_state)
Other Groups Working to End the Death Penalty in the US Using
the Human Rights Framework:
Human Rights Advocates: http://www.humanrightsadvocates.org/?s=death+penalty&x=0&y=0
e Advocates for Human Rights: http://discoverhumanrights.org/Human_Rights_and_the_
Death_Penalty2.html
Murder Victims’ Families for Human Rights (MVFHR): http://www.mvr.org/
Worldwide
World Coalition Against the Death Penalty: http://www.worldcoalition.org/
e International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH): http://www.dh.org/-english-
Reprieve: http://www.reprieve.org/home.htm
Amnesty International: http://www.amnesty.org/en/50/campaigns/death-penalty
e International Justice Project: http://www.internationaljusticeproject.org/contact.cfm
Center for Constitutional Rights, 666 Broadway, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10012
email [email protected] • www.CCRjustice.org
