Sample Annotated References (APA Style)
Doe, J. (2009). Applications of realist political theory. Journal of Political Theory, 99(12),
304-310.
Doe, an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Bratislava,
argues that despite developments in constructivist international theory, realism is still
the best paradigm for understanding International Relations (IR). Doe takes five
principle assertions from classical realism and modern constructivism and applies them
to three prominent events in recent IR: the attacks on the U.S.S. Cole, the 9/11 attacks
and the war in Iraq. Doe determined that since realism puts greater emphasis
specifically on the given nature of the world stage, realism is more useful and more
correct than constructivism.
While Doe’s analysis is useful, the study does not sufficiently answer why a
political theory emphasizing a given nature of international relations is more ideal than a
theory that does not emphasize it. Regardless, the definitions of realism and
constructivism, as well as the general principles behind the methodology, are the most
useful aspects of this article, even if its execution of the methodology is poor. I will use
Doe’s definitions of realism and constructivism in my own research.
Sample Annotation (Chicago Manual of Style)
Borstelmann, Thomas. The Cold War and the Color Line: American Race Relations in
the Global Arena. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.
Borstelmann, a Professor of Modern History at the University of Nebraska
Lincoln, explores the role of race in the domestic and international politics of the
American Cold War. He contextualizes the Civil Rights Movement in the international
arena in order to argue that the American Civil Rights Movement was tied to the rise of
postwar anti-colonialism and the rise of anticommunist culture. Further, Borstelmann
contends that the American Civil Rights Movement evolved into an international human
rights movement that continues today.
Because Borstelmann focuses his research on American policymakers and civil
rights leaders, he is successful at identifying the ways in which Cold War politics served
to expose America's racial injustices. He reveals the dichotomies and conflicts of
American domestic and foreign policy with the reality of blacks in America during the
time period in question. This source is valuable because it establishes the mounting
tension that eventually culminated in the race riots of 1967, which is a major aspect of
my own research. However, this is a historical narrative that has little insight into why
racial tension continued to increase despite major policy changes.