2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 1 of 135
Harvard Law School
Handbook of Academic Policies
2024-2025
Table of Contents
Notice: Delivery of Academic Programs ......................................................................................................... 8
Preface ........................................................................................................................................................................... 9
A. HLS Community Principles ......................................................................................................................... 9
B. HLS Community Principle on Non-Attribution .................................................................................. 9
C. Harvard University-Wide Statement on Rights and Responsibilities* ................................. 11
I. Requirements for the J.D. Degree ................................................................................................................ 14
A. Residence ........................................................................................................................................................ 14
B. Statement of Learning Outcomes .......................................................................................................... 15
C. First-Year J.D. Course and Credit Requirements ............................................................................ 15
D. Upper-Level J.D. Course and Credit Requirements ....................................................................... 16
1. Required Law School Classroom Work .......................................................................................... 16
2. Required Additional Credits ............................................................................................................... 16
3. Transfer Student J.D. Program - Special Considerations ........................................................ 17
4. Minimum Credit Requirement for VA Benefit-Eligible Students ....................................... 18
E. Definition of the Law School Credit Hour .......................................................................................... 18
F. Experiential Learning Requirement ..................................................................................................... 19
G. Professional Responsibility Requirement ......................................................................................... 19
H. International and Comparative Law Course Requirement ....................................................... 20
I. Negotiation/Leadership Requirement ................................................................................................. 20
J. Upper-Level J.D. Residency Requirements ......................................................................................... 20
K. Joint and Coordinated Degree Credit and Residency Requirements .................................... 21
L. J.D. Written Work Requirement ............................................................................................................. 22
1. Students Matriculating Prior to Fall 2023 .................................................................................... 22
2. Students Matriculating Fall 2023 and Thereafter ..................................................................... 24
3. Experiential Learning, Professional Responsibility, and Written Work .......................... 26
4. Supervision ................................................................................................................................................. 26
5. Supervision by Visiting Faculty ......................................................................................................... 26
6. Prohibition Against Compensation .................................................................................................. 26
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 2 of 135
7. Multiple Use of Papers ........................................................................................................................... 26
8. Human Subjects Research .................................................................................................................... 27
M. Pro Bono Requirement ............................................................................................................................. 27
N. Pro Bono and Written Work Credit for Political Activities ....................................................... 28
1. Pro Bono Credit ........................................................................................................................................ 29
2. Written Work Credit ............................................................................................................................... 29
O. Class Attendance and Participation; Overlapping Class Times ............................................... 30
P. Grades for J.D. Students ............................................................................................................................. 31
1. Honors, Pass, Low Pass, or Fail Grades .......................................................................................... 31
2. Dean’s Scholar Prizes ............................................................................................................................. 31
3. Credit/Fail Grades ................................................................................................................................... 31
Q. Extensions ....................................................................................................................................................... 31
R. Grade Changes ............................................................................................................................................... 32
S. Completion of Course Evaluations and Grade Release ................................................................ 33
T. Graduation with Honors ........................................................................................................................... 33
U. Satisfactory Academic Progress ............................................................................................................ 35
1. Minimum Grades for J.D. Students ................................................................................................... 35
2. Minimum Annual Progress for J.D. Students ................................................................................ 36
V. Retaking Courses, Taking a Different Examination in the Same Course, and Substitute
Work ....................................................................................................................................................................... 38
II. Requirements for Graduate Degrees ....................................................................................................... 39
A. Master of Laws (LL.M.) .............................................................................................................................. 39
1. LL.M. Residence and Credit Requirements ................................................................................... 39
2. Recommended Courses ......................................................................................................................... 40
3. Class Attendance and Participation; Overlapping Class Times ........................................... 41
4. Grades for LL.M. Students .................................................................................................................... 42
5. Completion of Course Evaluations and Grade Release ............................................................ 44
6. LL.M. Written Work Requirement .................................................................................................... 44
7. Additional Rules Relating to the LL.M. Written Work Requirement ................................. 45
B. Doctor of Juridical Science (S.J.D.) ........................................................................................................ 48
1. Study Plan ................................................................................................................................................... 48
2. First Year in Residence .......................................................................................................................... 49
3. Oral Examination ..................................................................................................................................... 49
4. Prospectus .................................................................................................................................................. 50
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 3 of 135
5. Presentations at the S.J.D. Colloquium ........................................................................................... 50
6. Submission and Acceptance of the Doctoral Dissertation ..................................................... 50
7. Oral Defense of the Dissertation ....................................................................................................... 52
8. Submission of Dissertation to the Library .................................................................................... 52
9. Compliance with Requirements ........................................................................................................ 53
III. Additional Academic Opportunities (J.D. and Graduate Programs) ......................................... 53
A. Additional Written Work Opportunities ............................................................................................ 53
1. Optional Written Work ......................................................................................................................... 53
2. Winter Term Writing Program .......................................................................................................... 55
B. Clinical Legal Education ............................................................................................................................ 56
1. Overview...................................................................................................................................................... 56
2. Requirements for Clinical Credits .................................................................................................... 57
3. Enrollment and Credits ......................................................................................................................... 59
4. International J.D. Students in Clinics ............................................................................................... 60
5. Opportunities for Student Practice .................................................................................................. 60
C. Cross-Registration ....................................................................................................................................... 62
1. Cross-Registration from Harvard Law School ............................................................................ 62
2. Cross-Registration into Harvard Law School .............................................................................. 65
D. Auditing a Harvard Law School Course ............................................................................................. 66
E. Joint, Coordinated, and Concurrent Degree Opportunities for J.D. Students ..................... 66
1. Joint Degree Programs .......................................................................................................................... 66
2. Coordinated J.D./Ph.D. Program ....................................................................................................... 67
3. Concurrent Degrees ................................................................................................................................ 67
4. Rules and Policies .................................................................................................................................... 67
F. J.D. Studies at Other Schools .................................................................................................................... 68
1. Study Abroad for J.D. Students ........................................................................................................... 68
2. Berkeley Exchange Program for J.D. Students ............................................................................ 68
3. Visits at Other Law Schools ................................................................................................................. 69
4. Coordinating Approved Studies at Other Schools ..................................................................... 69
IV. Examinations .................................................................................................................................................... 69
A. General Examination Policy .................................................................................................................... 69
B. Deferred Examination Policy .................................................................................................................. 70
C. Retaking an Examination .......................................................................................................................... 73
V. Academic Honesty ............................................................................................................................................ 73
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 4 of 135
A. Violation of Examination Rules; Dishonesty in Examinations ................................................. 73
B. Preparation of Papers and Other WorkPlagiarism and Collaboration ............................ 73
C. Multiple Use of Papers ............................................................................................................................... 76
VI. Registration Schedule and Course Change Deadlines ..................................................................... 76
A. Registration Overview ............................................................................................................................... 76
B. Check-in............................................................................................................................................................ 76
1. Check-in Process and Administrative Clearance ....................................................................... 76
2. Check-in Dates and Administrative Clearance Dates ............................................................... 77
3. Certification ................................................................................................................................................ 77
C. Course and Clinic Registration Periods .............................................................................................. 77
D. Course Add/Drop Deadlines ................................................................................................................... 78
E. Course Withdrawal Deadlines ................................................................................................................ 78
F. Clinic Add/Drop Deadlines ...................................................................................................................... 79
G. Clinic Withdrawal Deadlines ................................................................................................................... 80
H. Course and Clinic Waitlists ...................................................................................................................... 80
VII. Written Work Registration Deadlines .................................................................................................. 81
A. Summary of Written Work Registration Deadlines ...................................................................... 81
B. Registration for the J.D. Written Work Requirement ................................................................... 82
1. Students Matriculating Prior to Fall 2023 .................................................................................... 82
2. Students Matriculating Fall 2023 and Thereafter ..................................................................... 83
C. Registration for the LL.M. Written Work Requirement ............................................................... 84
D. Mandatory Registration for the Written Work Requirement .................................................. 84
E. Registration for Optional Written Work ............................................................................................ 85
F. Application and Registration for the Winter Term Writing Program ................................... 85
G. Additional Credit for J.D. Written Work ............................................................................................. 85
H. Registration for Written Work for Upper-Level J.D. and LL.M. Writing Groups .............. 86
VIII. Deadlines for Submission of Law School Work .............................................................................. 86
A. Submission Deadlines for Academic Work ....................................................................................... 86
B. Submission Deadlines for Academic Work in Courses, Seminars, and Reading Groups
................................................................................................................................................................................... 87
C. Submission Deadlines for Option 1 or the Analytical Paper (independent papers only)
of the J.D. Written Work Requirement; LL.M. Written Work Requirement; Optional
Written Work; Winter Term Writing Program .................................................................................... 87
1. Deadline for All Students ...................................................................................................................... 87
2. Extensions for May Degree Candidates (J.D. and LL.M.) ......................................................... 88
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 5 of 135
3. Extensions for 1Ls and 2Ls .................................................................................................................. 88
D. Submission Deadlines for Option 2 of the J.D. Written Work Requirement ...................... 88
IX. Deadlines for Applying to Special Programs ....................................................................................... 88
A. Joint and Concurrent Degree and Study Abroad Deadlines ...................................................... 88
B. Berkeley Exchange Program ................................................................................................................... 89
C. Program for Visits at Other Law Schools ........................................................................................... 89
X. Leaves and Withdrawals ............................................................................................................................... 89
A. Voluntary Leave of Absence .................................................................................................................... 89
B. Requesting a Leave ...................................................................................................................................... 89
C. Involuntary Leaves of Absence .............................................................................................................. 90
D. While on a Leave of Absence .................................................................................................................. 92
E. Extending Voluntary Leaves .................................................................................................................... 93
F. Returning to School ..................................................................................................................................... 94
G. Agreements to Engage in Treatment ................................................................................................... 96
H. Clearance for Return .................................................................................................................................. 96
Procedure for Notice and Consultation ................................................................................................. 97
I. Financial Implications of Taking a Leave ............................................................................................ 97
XI. Administrative Board .................................................................................................................................... 99
A. Disciplinary Actions .................................................................................................................................... 99
B. Procedures for Disciplinary Cases* .................................................................................................... 100
XII. Other Rules and Important Information ........................................................................................... 104
A. Notice of Non-Discrimination and Harvard Non-Discrimination and Anti-Bullying
Policies ................................................................................................................................................................. 104
B. Title IX Policies and Information ........................................................................................................ 105
C. Harvard Law School FERPA Policy ..................................................................................................... 106
1. Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (“FERPA”) ......................................................... 106
2. Education Records ................................................................................................................................ 106
3. Access .......................................................................................................................................................... 106
4. Directory Information ......................................................................................................................... 107
5. Other Disclosures Permitted under FERPA................................................................................ 107
6. Student Rights under FERPA ............................................................................................................ 108
D. Protest and Dissent Guidelines ............................................................................................................ 108
1. Picketing and Distributing Literature ........................................................................................... 109
2. Silent or Symbolic Protest .................................................................................................................. 109
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 6 of 135
3. Noise ............................................................................................................................................................ 109
4. Force or Violence ................................................................................................................................... 110
5. Audience Responsibility ..................................................................................................................... 110
6. Moderator/Facilitator ......................................................................................................................... 110
E. Student Complaints Implicating Compliance with ABA Standards for Legal Education
................................................................................................................................................................................. 111
F. Class Recordings ......................................................................................................................................... 111
1. Reasons for Student Class Recording Requests ........................................................................ 111
2. Automated Recordings ........................................................................................................................ 113
3. Publication of Recordings .................................................................................................................. 113
G. Student International Travel ................................................................................................................ 114
H. Student Employment ............................................................................................................................... 115
I. Use of University Libraries ...................................................................................................................... 116
J. Information Technology Services ........................................................................................................ 116
1. Harvard Law School Computer and Network Resources Usage Agreement ............... 116
2. Use of Computer and Network Resources .................................................................................. 117
3. Compliance with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 ...................................... 118
4. Policy on Access to Electronic Information ................................................................................ 118
5. Security and Privacy ............................................................................................................................. 119
6. Anonymous and Pseudonymous Communications................................................................. 120
7. Misuse of Resources ............................................................................................................................. 120
8. Emergency Situations and Compliance with Account Quotas............................................ 121
9. Copyright and Software Licenses ................................................................................................... 121
10. Cases of Misconduct ........................................................................................................................... 121
11. Leaving Harvard Law School ......................................................................................................... 122
K. Multimedia Studio ..................................................................................................................................... 122
L. Video Security Policies ............................................................................................................................. 122
M. Harvard University I.D. Cards .............................................................................................................. 122
N. Payment of Bills .......................................................................................................................................... 123
O. Harvard Law School Drug and Alcohol Policy ............................................................................... 124
1. Policy ........................................................................................................................................................... 124
2. Provisions Regarding Alcohol Service and Use at Harvard Law School ........................ 125
3. Drinking Age ............................................................................................................................................ 125
4. Bartenders ................................................................................................................................................ 125
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 7 of 135
5. Police Presence ....................................................................................................................................... 126
6. Food and Non-Alcoholic Beverages ............................................................................................... 126
7. Off-campus Events Private Residence ....................................................................................... 126
8. Off-campus Events Bars, Restaurants, and Off-Site Function Facilities ..................... 126
9. Liquor Licenses ....................................................................................................................................... 126
P. Cambridge No Smoking Ordinance and Harvard No Smoking Policy ................................. 127
1. City of Cambridge No Smoking Ordinance.................................................................................. 127
2. Harvard No Smoking Policy .............................................................................................................. 127
Q. Harvard Law School Missing Persons Policy ................................................................................. 127
R. Nonresident Student Driver Statements and Decals .................................................................. 128
S. Voter Registration ...................................................................................................................................... 129
T. Massachusetts Anti-Hazing Statute .................................................................................................... 129
269:17. Hazing; organizing or participating; hazing defined .................................................. 129
269:18. Failure to report hazing .......................................................................................................... 130
269:19. Copy of secs. 1719; issuance to students and student groups, teams and
organizations; report ................................................................................................................................ 130
610 CMR 5.00: Hazing Reporting ........................................................................................................ 131
U. Harvard University Rules for Campus Use ..................................................................................... 133
Appendix A: Harvard Law School: The Well, Harvard University Health Services, Counseling
and Mental Health Services, and Center for Wellness and Health Promotion .......................... 134
Appendix B: Emergency and Safety Information .................................................................................. 135
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 8 of 135
Notice: Delivery of Academic Programs
In recent years, Harvard Law School has had to act quickly to implement
contingency scenarios in order to protect the health and safety of our community, while
ensuring the continuity of our teaching and research mission. Harvard Law School
continues to retain the discretion to adjust its mode of teaching as it deems necessary in
extraordinary circumstances, including by making recourse to online instruction and
implementing compulsory testing and tracing programs as required conditions for
accessing the Harvard campus or Harvard facilities.
Students are expected to make themselves familiar with the policies in this
Handbook of Academic Policies and with related updates and guidance as provided
throughout the year, which are herein incorporated by reference to the Handbook.
Notwithstanding the policies set out in this Handbook, students interested in
applying for, or with questions about, accommodations should be in contact with Harvard
Law School’s Accessibility Services team.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 9 of 135
Preface
A. HLS Community Principles
The Law School's commitments to fairness, respect for the rule of law, and free inquiry
require an environment of trust and mutual respect, free expression and inquiry, and a
commitment to truth, excellence, and lifelong learning. Students, program participants,
faculty, staff, and alumni accept these principles when they join the Harvard Law School
community and thereby agree to respect the rights, dignity, and differences of others,
pursue honesty and integrity in dealing with all members of the community in person and
online, and accept personal responsibility in these efforts.
B. HLS Community Principle on Non-Attribution
To fulfill Harvard Law School’s mission of training excellent lawyers, our classrooms must
offer an environment in which all participants feel able to engage in free, open, respectful
discussion of complex, sensitive, and consequential questions. Our classrooms are places in
which students make arguments sometimes because they deeply believe in them,
sometimes because they’re exploring what they believe, and sometimes because they’re
trying to understand a contrary view or have been asked by the professor to take a position
with which they may disagree. Everybody is learning, everybody has to think and respond
within fast-moving discussions, and everybody will make mistakes as part of the law school
learning process. In training to be the best lawyers they can be, students must be able to try
arguments on for size, change their minds, and take risks.
The proliferation of social media affects this learning environment. Because of the potential
permanence and widespread dissemination of communications through social media and
other forms of communication designed to reach members of the public, if statements
made in class are quoted or described with attribution in those media, students may be
reluctant to approach any question, particularly controversial ones, with the openness and
vulnerability they need to grow as lawyers and to learn from one another. Moreover, given
the particular pedagogy of law classes, it may be hard, when quoting statements made in
class, to accurately distinguish when speakers are expressing their own views or speaking
in the role of advocate, to capture all of the qualifications or nuance that speakers may have
provided, or to fairly convey the full context necessary to understand why speakers took a
particular position on a complex legal question. In addition, the widespread dissemination
of such statements with attribution may risk subjecting the speaker to online harassment,
bullying, or worse.
The Harvard Law School Community Principles generally address these types of concerns
by requiring all of us “to respect the rights, dignity, and differences of others, pursue
honesty and integrity in dealing with all members of the community in person and online,
and accept personal responsibility in these efforts.” See Preface A above. That community
includes students, staff, and faculty. However, because it is especially important for
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 10 of 135
students to bring an attitude of openness and experimentation to their learning, and
because our pedagogy often requires students to speak in class and take positions on topics
not of their choosing, an additional Community Principle, modeled on the Chatham House
Rule, is appropriate for student statements made in class. In particular, the following
principle applies to classroom discussion:
When using social media or other forms of communication designed to reach
members of the public, no one may repeat or describe a statement made by a
student in class in a manner that would enable a person who was not present
in the class to identify the speaker of the statement.
In addition to this non-attribution principle, it is important always to work to identify and
foster the norms and conditions that will encourage free, open, and respectful classroom
discourse that will build community, enable all in a broad and diverse community to learn
from one another, and support excellence in teaching and learning.
Interpretive Comments:
a. The phrase “statement made in class” includes a verbal statement made in any class
session of a course, as well as a written statement made in class or classroom-
related spaces (such as a Zoom chat or a Canvas discussion thread).
b. Nothing in the foregoing prevents: (a) a faculty member or students in a course from
otherwise communicating, in person or electronically, with one another in a manner
that attributes statements to a student; or (b) face-to-face discussion or email, text,
or other interpersonal exchanges about class discussion, provided that exchanges
under these subsections (as with all exchanges) respect the generally applicable
Harvard Law School Community Principles outlined above.
c. Nothing in the foregoing prevents: (a) a student or faculty member from referring to
a statement made in class with attribution in seeking assistance from HLS or
University administrators or faculty or reporting to appropriate officials misconduct
under law or University or HLS policy; or (b) a faculty member from otherwise
performing ordinary responsibilities as an advisor or recommender.
d. In order to further facilitate open classroom discussion, faculty members may adopt
additional guidelines regarding recounting or reporting on statements made in
class. Any such guidelines should be stated clearly and prominently in writing at the
outset of the course in a syllabus or statement of classroom policies.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 11 of 135
C. Harvard University-Wide Statement on Rights and
Responsibilities*
The central functions of an academic community are learning, teaching, research, and
scholarship. By accepting membership in the University, an individual joins a community
ideally characterized by free expression, free inquiry, intellectual honesty, respect for the
dignity of others, and openness to constructive change. The rights and responsibilities
exercised within the community must be compatible with these qualities.
The rights of members of the University are not fundamentally different from those of
other members of society. The University, however, has a special autonomy and reasoned
dissent plays a particularly vital part in its existence. All members of the University have
the right to press for action on matters of concern by any appropriate means. The
University must affirm, assure, and protect the rights of its members to organize and join
political associations, convene and conduct public meetings, publicly demonstrate and
picket in orderly fashion, advocate, and publicize opinion by print, sign, and voice.
The University places special emphasis, as well, upon certain values which are essential to
its nature as an academic community. Among these are freedom of speech and academic
freedom, freedom from personal force and violence, and freedom of movement.
Interference with any of these freedoms must be regarded as a serious violation of the
personal rights upon which the community is based. Furthermore, although the
administrative processes and activities of the University cannot be ends in themselves,
such functions are vital to the orderly pursuit of the work of all members of the University.
Therefore, interference with members of the University in performance of their normal
duties and activities must be regarded as unacceptable obstruction of the essential
processes of the University. Theft or willful destruction of the property of the University or
its members must also be considered an unacceptable violation of the rights of individuals
or of the community as a whole.
Moreover, it is the responsibility of all members of the academic community to maintain an
atmosphere in which violations of rights are unlikely to occur and to develop processes by
which these rights are fully assured. In particular, it is the responsibility of officers of
administration and instruction to be alert to the needs of the University community; to give
full and fair hearing to reasoned expressions of grievances; and to respond promptly and in
good faith to such expressions and to widely expressed needs for change. In making
decisions that concern the community as a whole or any part of the community, officers are
expected to consult with those affected by the decisions. Failures to meet these
responsibilities may be profoundly damaging to the life of the University. Therefore, the
University community has the right to establish orderly procedures consistent with
imperatives of academic freedom to assess the policies and assure the responsibility of
those whose decisions affect the life of the University.
No violation of the rights of members of the University, nor any failure to meet
responsibilities, should be interpreted as justifying any violation of the rights of members
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 12 of 135
of the University. All members of the communitystudents and officers alikeshould
uphold the rights and responsibilities expressed in this Statement if the University is to be
characterized by mutual respect and trust.
1. Interpretation
It is implicit in the language of the Statement on Rights and Responsibilities that intense
personal harassment of such a character as to amount to grave disrespect for the dignity of
others be regarded as an unacceptable violation of the personal rights on which the
University is based.
It is implicit in the University-wide Statement on Rights and Responsibilities that any
unauthorized occupation of a University building, or any part of it, that interferes with the
ability of members of the University to perform their normal activities constitutes
unacceptable conduct in violation of the Statement and is subject to appropriate discipline.
This University-wide Statement and its first interpretation were adopted on an interim basis
by the Governing Boards on September 20, 1970, and were voted to remain in effect
indefinitely in May 1977. The second interpretation was adopted by the Governing Boards in
January-February 2002.
2. Statement of the President and Deans on University Rights and
Responsibilities (2002):
In view of events last spring and beyond, questions have been raised about Harvard’s
policies regarding protests and demonstrations. We take this opportunity to affirm our
shared commitment to an academic community in which all members of the University are
able to express their views freely and vigorously. We also affirm our commitment to
ensuring that all members of the University are able to carry out their normal duties and
activities in support of the University’s mission without interference or constraint by
others. These commitments are expressed in the longstanding University-wide Statement
on Rights and Responsibilities. We believe it is timely to remind the University community
of this longstanding policy statement and its application to unauthorized occupation of
University buildings. To highlight that aspect of the existing policy, we have proposed and
the Governing Boards have adopted an “interpretation” of the Statement, parallel to a prior
“interpretation” regarding personal harassment. The newly adopted interpretation has
been appended to the University-wide Statement on Rights and Responsibilities and now
appears at the bottom of its text.
While we recognize that the determination of specific penalties for violation of this policy
by students is primarily the responsibility of the several faculties, we regard it as essential
that there be shared understandings across the University that emphasize the serious
nature of building occupations that interfere with the ability of members of the University
to carry out their normal duties and activities and the serious consequences that should
follow from such interference. We are therefore informing the relevant officers and
committees in our faculties of our shared view that students who engage in such conduct
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 13 of 135
should ordinarily be subject to suspension, and that others who engage in similar conduct
should be subject to appropriate sanction. Of course, applicable laws may also bear on such
conduct, and the University-wide Statement itself has potential application to many other
forms of conduct.
We also believe it important, when a building occupation or similar acts involve
participants from different Schools, that steps be taken toward coordination in the
approach to discipline, including possible reference to the University-wide Committee on
Rights and Responsibilities.
*To implement and effectuate the University-Wide Statement of Rights and Responsibilities,
the Law School’s policies include Protest and Dissent Guidelines (Section XII(D)). Note
Harvard University has adopted Fact-Finding Procedures for cases involving possible
violations of the University-wide Statement on Rights and Responsibilities involving students
from two or more Faculties or cases alleging that students from one Faculty have disrupted
the performance of normal duties and activities within another Faculty.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 14 of 135
I. Requirements for the J.D. Degree
A. Residence
1. Attendance at Harvard Law School is full-time, in-person for a period of three
academic years, which consists of the fall, winter, and spring terms. Students are
expected to maintain the minimum credit requirements stated in the Upper-Level
J.D. Residency Requirements (Section I(J)). To be awarded the J.D. degree, a
student must complete a minimum of 88 credits.
2. Students enrolled at the Law School may not be simultaneously enrolled, either full-
time or part-time, in any other school or college either within Harvard University or
at any other institution, unless they are enrolled in one of the Law School’s joint
degree programs, are completing a semester at a foreign institution in an approved
study abroad program, or are cross-registered in courses authorized by the Law
School.
3. Except in extraordinary circumstances and as approved by the Law School’s
Administrative Board, students must complete the degree requirements for the J.D.
within seven years of matriculation in law school. Additionally, students should
note that some jurisdictions prescribe a shorter period of time during which the J.D.
must be completed. For example, New York requires that the J.D. degree be
completed within five years after a student has commenced the study of law in a law
school.
4. In accordance with Harvard Law School policy, students may not be employed for
more than 20 hours of work per week during the academic year while classes are in
session.
5. The relevant registration, application, and submission deadlines for the current year
are set forth in Sections VI through IX.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 15 of 135
B. Statement of Learning Outcomes
Harvard Law School prepares students to be outstanding lawyers who will achieve success
in all parts of the profession and become leaders who further the best ideals of law and
justice across many fields. The Law School’s programs and activities are designed to enable
each student to achieve, at a minimum, the following competencies:
1. Knowledge and understanding of substantive and procedural law, and the domestic,
international, and transnational institutions that make and apply law;
2. Aptitude for legal analysis and legal reasoning;
3. Appreciation of and commitment to the values and responsibilities of members of
the legal profession;
4. Proficiency in the use of professional skills including: research as to law and fact,
communication, presentation, and problem solving.
C. First-Year J.D. Course and Credit Requirements
Beginning with students matriculating in the fall 2019, the first-year J.D. degree
requirements are:
1. The required first-year courses: Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Contracts,
Criminal Law, Legislation and Regulation, Property, and Torts;
2. Completion of the January Experiential Term;
3. First-Year Legal Research and Writing, which includes the First-Year Ames Moot
Court Program; and
4. A spring upper-level elective course of a minimum of two and a maximum of four
law school classroom credits.
The courses noted in this section constitute full-time enrollment during the first year of
study. Clinic participation and cross-registration are not permitted during the 1L year.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 16 of 135
D. Upper-Level J.D. Course and Credit Requirements
Table 1 - Upper-Level Credit Requirements
Total Minimum
Credits
Minimum
Classroom
Credits
Maximum
Clinical Credits
Maximum
Writing Credits
Maximum Cross-
Registration
Credits
52
36
16
12
12
After satisfactory completion of the first-year Law School requirements, all J.D. students
must earn no fewer than 52 additional credits in upper-level work, including:
1. Required Law School Classroom Work
Students must complete at least 36 credits in law school classroom work (includes law
school courses, seminars and reading groups, but not writing, clinical, or cross-registration
credits). Law school classroom courses taken in fulfillment of the Professional
Responsibility Requirement, the International and Comparative Law Course Requirement,
and the Negotiation/Leadership Requirement count toward this minimum. See Section
I(G), Section I(H), and Section I(I).
2. Required Additional Credits
Students may earn the remaining required 16 credits by completing written, clinical, or
additional law school classroom work and by completing courses taken through cross-
registration. Written work, clinical, and cross-registration credits do not count toward the
law school classroom credit required minimum.
The following rules apply to these additional credits:
a) Clinical Work: Up to 16 credits may be earned through clinical work. Students may
enroll in only one clinic per term. Questions about clinical credits should be
addressed to the Office of Clinical and Pro Bono Programs. See also Section
III(B)(2).
b) Written Work: Up to 12 credits may be earned through written work (including
work satisfying the J.D. Written Work Requirement) (see Section I(L) and Section
III(A)). Credits earned through writing for additional credit in a course, seminar, or
workshop are assigned to the same term as the course, seminar, or workshop, or in
the case of a three-credit winter course, to the adjacent spring term.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 17 of 135
c) Cross-Registration, Joint, and Coordinated Degrees: Up to 12 credits may be
earned in courses taken through cross-registration or, in most cases, at another
school as part of a joint or coordinated degree program. See Section III(C) and
Section III(E)). See requirements for individual joint degree programs for details.
d) Ordinarily, a student may not exceed the maximum limits on credits for clinical
work, written work, and cross-registration. In exceptional cases, when a student is
on track to meet the upper-level credit requirements as set out in this Handbook
(including the minimum of 36 law school classroom credits), the student may be
permitted to exceed the credit limits for clinical work (with the permission of the
Office of Clinical and Pro Bono Programs), written work, or cross-registration (with
permission of the Dean for Academic and Faculty Affairs), provided that, in so doing,
the student exceeds the 52 upper-level credit minimum by the same number of
credits. In addition, any clinical or written work credits taken in excess of the
maximum credit limits will not count toward Latin honors. See Section I(T)(8)(c).
3. Transfer Student J.D. Program - Special Considerations
a) Law courses taken before matriculation at Harvard Law School will be considered
part of the transfer student's first year of J.D. studies and may not be used to meet
any Harvard Law School upper-level credit requirements and will not be included in
Latin honors calculations.
b) Transfer students must satisfy the Law School’s first-year requirements (with the
exception of the 1L January Experiential Term) and can do so through
demonstrating completion of comparable courses at their prior institution or
completion of qualifying courses after matriculation at Harvard Law School. For the
list of qualifying courses, please consult the Office of the Registrar.
c) Harvard Law School courses taken by a transfer studentincluding first-year law
school courses and qualifying courses taken after matriculation to bring the transfer
student into compliance with Harvard Law School's first-year requirementsmay
be used toward the 52 upper-level credit minimum and will count in overall
performance in the 2L or 3L year according to the rules set forth in this Handbook
(i.e., Credit/Fail and cross-registration courses are not included in Latin honors
calculations (see Section I(T)). Transfer students who need to complete a first-year
Harvard Law School required course(s) must complete the course(s) during their
first year of matriculation into the law school.
d) All transfer students, regardless of the number of credits completed in their 1L year,
must complete a minimum of 83 total credits in order to earn the J.D.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 18 of 135
e) Transfer students may seek pro bono credit for work completed at their prior law
school or during the summer prior to coming to Harvard Law School. For more
information about the Pro Bono requirement, please see the Pro Bono Requirement
webpage or contact the Office of Clinical and Pro Bono Programs.
4. Minimum Credit Requirement for VA Benefit-Eligible Students
The VA considers 12 credits to be a full-time course load at HLS. Students eligible for
benefits through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) must enroll in a minimum of 12
credits in the fall term and a minimum of 12 credits combined in the winter and spring
terms to be eligible to receive 100% of their VA benefits for each term. Students who take
fewer than 12 credits in a term will see their housing allowance benefit prorated based on
their reduced credit load. Tuition related benefits are not affected by this requirement. The
VA will pay the full tuition-related benefits for which a student is eligible regardless of
whether or not the student is enrolled in 12 credits.
E. Definition of the Law School Credit Hour
The American Bar Association standards for accrediting law schools use a formula for
calculating the amount of work that constitutes one credit hour. In accordance with ABA
Standard 310(b), "a 'credit hour' is an amount of work that reasonably approximates: (1)
not less than one hour of classroom or direct faculty instruction and two hours of out-of-
class student work per week for fifteen weeks, or the equivalent amount of work over a
different amount of time; or (2) at least an equivalent amount of work as required in
subparagraph (1) of this definition for other academic activities as established by the
institution, including simulation, field placement, clinical, co-curricular, and other academic
work leading to the award of credit hours."
Harvard Law School meets the requirements of Standard 310 as follows:
1) For classroom and simulation courses, courses must meet 60 minutes per week over
12 weeks for each credit awarded.
2) For clinical courses during the fall and spring semesters, students must work four
60-minute hours each week over 12 weeks for each credit earned. For more
information about clinical credit hours see Section III(B).
Faculty are required to evaluate their syllabi to ensure that assigned reading and writing
exercises required in preparation for class are a reasonable approximation of the out-of-
class student work standard of two hours per week per credit hour.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 19 of 135
F. Experiential Learning Requirement
Students must earn no fewer than six credits qualified as “experiential learning” courses.
The Harvard Law School Course Catalog identifies which courses and clinical offerings
fulfill the experiential learning requirement. In accordance with ABA standards, students
may not use a course to satisfy more than one of the professional responsibility
requirement, the experiential learning requirement, and the written work requirement
(Option 1 and Option 2 for J.D. students matriculating prior to Fall 2023, or the Analytical
Paper component of the requirement for J.D. students matriculating Fall 2023 and
thereafter). Individual state bars may have separate experiential learning (or equivalent)
requirements for admission; students are advised to check those requirements for any
state in which they may seek to practice.
G. Professional Responsibility Requirement
1. All students must complete a minimum of two law school classroom credits to
satisfy the Professional Responsibility Requirement.
2. The classroom components of certain clinical courses, as identified in the course
descriptions, may satisfy this requirement. A list of clinical courses that satisfy this
requirement can be found on the Office of the Registrar’s website.
3. Ordinarily, students are not allowed to enroll in two non-clinical professional
responsibility courses that satisfy the requirement. Students who have enrolled in a
clinical course that satisfies the Harvard Law School Professional Responsibility
Requirement may enroll in one additional Legal Profession course if
desired. Questions about this rule should be directed to the Dean for Academic and
Faculty Affairs.
4. In accordance with ABA standards, students may not use a course to satisfy more
than one of the professional responsibility requirement, the experiential learning
requirement, and the written work requirement (Option 1 and Option 2 for J.D.
students matriculating prior to Fall 2023, or the Analytical Paper component of the
requirement for J.D. students matriculating Fall 2023 and thereafter).
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 20 of 135
H. International and Comparative Law Course
Requirement
Beginning with students matriculating into the J.D. program in Fall 2019, J.D. students must
complete one course of at least three classroom credits that satisfies the International and
Comparative Law Course Requirement. All transfer students must also complete one
course of at least three classroom credits that satisfies this requirement. A listing of
qualified courses can be found in the Harvard Law School Course Catalog. Successful
completion of an HLS-approved study abroad program (see Section III(F)(1)) will fulfill
the International and Comparative Course Requirement.
I. Negotiation/Leadership Requirement
Beginning with students matriculating into the J.D. program in Fall 2023, J.D. students must
complete one course or clinic of at least two credits that satisfies the
Negotiation/Leadership Requirement. Offerings satisfying this requirement are designated
in the Harvard Law School Course Catalog, some of which may be taken in the 1L January
Experiential Term or 1L Spring Term.
J. Upper-Level J.D. Residency Requirements
1. The upper-level residency requirements are:
Table 2 - Upper-Level J.D. Residency Requirements
Residency Requirements
Minimum Total Credits
Maximum Total Credits
Each Year
24
35
Each Fall and Spring Term
10
16
Each Winter Term
2
3
2. In addition to fulfilling the upper-level course and credit requirements in Section
I(D), upper-level students must register for and receive a grade or an "Extension"
(EXT) notation (see Section I(Q)) in:
a) Not fewer than 24 nor more than 35 credits each year in each of the 2L and
3L years, regardless of the number of credits needed to complete the
required 52 upper-level credits;
b) Not fewer than 10 nor more than 16 credits in each fall and spring term, no
fewer than eight of which each semester must be for law school work. No
fewer than four of the eight law school credits must be for law school
classroom credit or clinical work that qualifies for experiential learning
credit.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 21 of 135
c) Not fewer than two nor more than three credits in each of two upper-level
winter terms, all of which must be for law school classroom or clinical work
that qualifies for experiential learning credit, or for written work under the
Winter Term Writing Program (see Section III(A)(2)). Full-time residency is
required during each of the two required upper-level winter terms. Cross-
registration into other schools during the winter term may be allowed in
limited circumstances. Students considering winter term cross-registration
should contact the Office of the Registrar.
d) Individual state bars may have additional law school residency
requirements; students are advised to check those requirements for any
state in which they may seek to practice.
3. Waivers: Any student wishing to seek a waiver to these upper-level J.D. residency
policies should contact the Office of the Registrar. The rules and practices with
respect to waivers are established and administered under the supervision of the
Administrative Board.
K. Joint and Coordinated Degree Credit and Residency
Requirements
Students enrolled in one of the School’s joint or coordinated degree programs may meet
credit and residency requirements in part through courses taken at the other school. For
more information, see Section III(E) and the relevant program description. For questions
about the joint, concurrent, and coordinated degree program opportunities for J.D.
students, contact the Associate Director of Academic Affairs. For questions about degree
requirements at the other school, students should contact the appropriate administrator at
the relevant school.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 22 of 135
L. J.D. Written Work Requirement
All students are expected to pursue serious written work. The Written Work Requirement
for J.D. students matriculating into HLS prior to Fall 2023 is set forth in Section 1 below.
The Written Work Requirement for J.D. students matriculating into HLS in Fall 2023 and
thereafter is set forth in Section 2 below.
1. Students Matriculating Prior to Fall 2023
a) Option 1
i. Description: Option 1 requires a substantial research paper of publishable
or professional quality, to be written in close consultation with a Law School
faculty member or instructor with a Law School teaching appointment,
through independent study (for two or three credits), or for additional credit
in a course, seminar, or workshop (for one, two, or three credits). (Note:
credits earned through writing completed for additional credit in a course,
seminar, or workshop are assigned to the same term as the course, seminar,
or workshop, or in the case of a three-credit winter course, to the adjacent
spring term.)
The substantial work involved in these papers typically produces a final
product of 30-60 pages for a two-credit effort. Students may also pursue a
larger project for three credits and aim for 100-200 pages. These papers can
take the form of academic scholarship, policy analysis, or professional legal
analysis and must be a substantial undertaking at least comparable to the
time demanded by a semester-long course or seminar. When pursuing an
empirical project, appropriate length, scope, breadth, etc., should be
determined in consultation with the faculty supervisor.
Work done as a research assistant or teaching fellow with a Law School
faculty member may, in some circumstances, be used to satisfy Option 1. See
Section III(A)(1)(c).
Work that cannot be used to satisfy Option 1 includes, but is not limited to,
continuation of previous work, required coursework (except for writing
completed for additional credit in a course, seminar, or workshop), or paid
work.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 23 of 135
ii. Registration for Option 1:
Deadlines (see also Section VII): Students must register for Option 1 of the
J.D. Written Work Requirement in advance of engaging in the work by
submitting the required registration form to the faculty supervisor for
approval, and then submitting the form to the Office of the Registrar by the
second Friday in October for fall term (2Ls and 3Ls), by the second Friday in
November for the winter term, and by the second Friday in February for
spring term (all J.D. students). Forms are available in hard copy at the Office
of the Registrar, WCC 4007 and online.
b) Option 2
i. Description: Option 2 requires two pieces of writing, which could include
any of the following, provided that at least one of the pieces is written under
the supervision of a Law School faculty member or instructor with a teaching
appointment.
a. Lawyer’s work product: including substantial original writing in a
clinic (with approval of the clinic director), upper-level moot court
briefs, or the equivalent, as certified by the supervisor of the
relevant program, but not written work from a summer job or paid
work;
b. Law school course and seminar papers: substantial writing as
part of a clinical course or seminar, including the standard series of
reaction papers, amounting to no fewer than 15 pages;
c. Law journal writing: including draft code and legislation, notes,
book reviews, descriptions of developments in the law, and the like
(totaling no fewer than ten publishable pages);
d. Nontraditional writing produced under faculty
supervision: including interactive web-based material, surveys of
students or practitioners with analysis, case study materials
appropriate for classroom use, or other law-related persuasive or
descriptive writing as approved by a Law School faculty member or
instructor with a Law School teaching appointment.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 24 of 135
ii. Registration for Option 2: (see also Section VII): Students must register for
Option 2 of the J.D. Written Work Requirement by submitting the registration
form with required signatures to the Office of the Registrar by February 1 of
the third year, or the following business day if February 1 falls on a weekend.
The form is available in hard copy at the Office of the Registrar and online. A
student with concerns about whether a particular piece of writing satisfies
Option 2, or with questions about registering, should contact the Office of the
Registrar. For clinical writing, questions should be directed to the Office of
Clinical and Pro Bono Programs.
2. Students Matriculating Fall 2023 and Thereafter
J.D. students matriculating into HLS in the Fall 2023 and thereafter must meet the written
work requirement by completing an analytical paper and professional writing. In order to
satisfy the requirement, both the analytical paper and professional writing must receive
review by an HLS faculty member or instructor holding a Law School teaching
appointment, and peer review.
a) Analytical paper requirement. In their second or third year, each J.D. student is
required to write a research paper of at least 20-25 pages under the supervision of
an HLS faculty member or instructor holding a Law School teaching appointment.
This requirement may be satisfied through papers written on an independent basis
with Law School faculty or instructor supervision, or through qualifying papers
written for a course, seminar, or workshop for additional writing credit.
i. Paper Length and Credits. The parameters for written work credit for
analytical papers under this requirement and optional written work (Section
III(A)(1)) are as follows. Instructors may determine that a shorter paper in
any of the categories below merits full credit due to the nature of the work
involved, such as papers involving extensive data collection and/or analysis.
One credit for 20-25 pages
Two credits for 50 or more pages
Three credits for 75 or more pages
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 25 of 135
b) Professional writing requirement. The professional writing requirement is a
piece of written work that would typically be created in the course of legal practice
by an attorney. The requirement must be satisfied with written work(s) of at least 5
pages, created as part of a clinic or a course that satisfies the experiential learning
requirement, upon approval from the supervising faculty member. Written work
supervised by an HLS faculty member or instructor holding a Law School teaching
appointment in other courses may satisfy the requirement upon approval by the
faculty member and the Assistant Dean of Clinical and Experiential Education.
Faculty members may consider the following factors in evaluating whether the
professional writing produced in clinics, externships, and/or experiential learning
courses satisfies the professional writing requirement:
Amount of time spent on the written work product(s)
Length of written work product(s)
Original contribution of student to written work product(s)
Degree of legal analysis, complexity of issues addressed
Quality of written work product(s), including clarity, persuasiveness, efficacy
for desired goal
Extent of peer and supervisor feedback on written work product(s)
Audience for the written work product(s), i.e., client, partner, advocacy
target
Individual contributions to a team written work product may satisfy the
professional writing requirement when evaluated in the context of the above listed
factors.
Examples of written work that do not satisfy the requirement include, but are not
limited to, templates, forms, routine emails and texts, personal reflection papers,
journal entries, and writing that does not incorporate original legal analysis or peer
or supervisor feedback.
For externships, instructors may rely on supervisor review and confirmation that
the work product meets the evaluation criteria. Work product created as part of the
independent clinical program will not satisfy the professional writing requirement.
Further information regarding satisfaction of the two components of the written work
requirement is available online.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 26 of 135
3. Experiential Learning, Professional Responsibility, and Written Work
In accordance with ABA standards, students may not use a course to satisfy more than one
of the experiential learning requirement, the professional responsibility requirement, and
the written work requirement (Option 1 and Option 2 for J.D. students matriculating prior
to Fall 2023, or the Analytical Paper component of the requirement for J.D. students
matriculating Fall 2023 and thereafter).
4. Supervision
Students may ask any Law School faculty member or instructor with a Law School teaching
appointment to supervise written work. Faculty on certain types of leave may not be
available in a given term.
5. Supervision by Visiting Faculty
Writing credits under the supervision of visiting faculty must be registered for, and
ordinarily completed, during the term(s) of the visitor’s appointment. Note that many
visitors have Law School appointments for only one term. Students with questions about
visiting faculty supervision outside of the faculty member's term of appointment should
contact the Office of the Registrar.
6. Prohibition Against Compensation
A student may not receive academic credit for written work for which they also receive
compensation, with the exception of summer internships for which J.D. students may seek
approval from the Dean for Academic and Faculty Affairs to receive academic credit.
7. Multiple Use of Papers
Occasionally students seek to submit one paper for two or more courses or seminars. In
such cases, the paper must be of sufficiently greater scope or depth to warrant such
multiple credit. In order to assure compliance with this requirement, any student planning
to submit the same or similar written work in more than one academic offering must first
get the approval of the Dean for Academic and Faculty Affairs by submitting a memo that
documents the project plan. The instructors involved should discuss appropriate ways to
make sure that the submitted work meets this greater burden. This memo must be signed
by the instructors for both courses and must set forth the way in which the paper will meet
the added requirement described herein.
Once the Dean for Academic and Faculty Affairs approves the project, the memo must then
be submitted to the Office of the Registrar before the student is accorded the requested
credits. This rule applies to submission of work in any offering whether at the Law School
or elsewhere. A student who submits the same, or substantially the same, work in more
than one course without such prior permission, will be subject to disciplinary action.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 27 of 135
8. Human Subjects Research
Law School projects involving human subjects are reviewed by The Committee on the Use
of Human Subjects (CUHS) within the Office of the Vice Provost for Research (OVPR).
Students considering projects that fall under IRB purview, i.e., regulated research with
human subjects (including surveys or interviews) should review the University’s policies
on the use of human subjects in research available on the CUHS Website and discuss their
work with an IRB Administrator at CUHS. Note that students should allow sufficient time
for IRB review; late requests for review may not be granted. Requests are triaged within
CUHS; please email [email protected] or call (617) 496-2847. In addition, students whose
research involves the collection or storage of human subject information must establish
data security procedures that reflect the sensitivity of the data and in accordance with the
Harvard Research Data Security Policy. Please contact ITS at [email protected] for
additional information.
M. Pro Bono Requirement
The Office of Clinical and Pro Bono Programs administers the Pro Bono Requirement.
Participation in most clinics will satisfy the HLS Pro Bono Requirement. For more
information about Clinical Legal Education, see Section III(B).
As a condition for graduation, Harvard Law School requires all J.D. students to contribute at
least 50 hours of uncompensated, pro bono legal work. Individual state bars may have
separate pro bono requirements for admission; students are advised to check those
requirements for any state in which they may seek to practice.
Work qualifying for the pro bono service requirement must be legal and supervised by a
licensed attorney and must be performed on behalf of (1) people who cannot afford, in
whole or in part, to pay for legal services; (2) the government; (3) a non-profit organization
as defined under IRS sections 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(4); (4) a law firm working on a pro bono
basis; or (5) a foreign equivalent of any of the above. The work must involve the application
or interpretation of law, the formulation of legal policy, the drafting of legislation or
regulations and/or work done in anticipation of litigation. The work should not be clerical
and must be uncompensated. Political campaign-related work may be credited toward the
Harvard Law School pro bono service requirement under the conditions indicated in the
School’s Pro Bono and Written Work Credit for Political Activities (Section I(N)) policies.
The pro bono work may be, but need not be, performed in a setting in which Harvard Law
School clinical credit is given or, in some instances, through the Law School’s volunteer
student practice organizations. Summer public interest work funded through the Summer
Public Interest Funding Program (SPIF) will count toward the requirement if the work
meets the pro bono requirements, is legal, and is supervised by a licensed attorney.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 28 of 135
Pro bono service may be performed in an approved supervised setting anytime between
the start of the 1L year and spring break of the 3L year, including the summers between
law school years. Transfer students may seek pro bono credit for work completed at their
prior law school or during the summer prior to coming to Harvard Law School.
For more information about the Pro Bono requirement, please see the Pro Bono
Requirement webpage or contact the Office of Clinical and Pro Bono Programs.
N. Pro Bono and Written Work Credit for Political
Activities
Harvard Law School is committed to the free and open expression of ideas, and Harvard
Law School’s institutional commitment to free expression applies with equal force in the
context of electoral politics. Harvard Law School encourages members of the community
faculty and staff as well as studentsto participate, in their personal capacities, in politics
at all levels.
However, federal law provides that Harvard may not “participate in, or intervene in
(including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of
(or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.” This prohibition on Harvard’s direct
and indirect institutional participation in partisan politics is expressed in Sections
501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, as a condition that Harvard must satisfy in order to
preserve and retain its status as a tax-exempt organization. In addition, the Federal
Election Campaign Act (“FECA”) prohibits corporations from making direct and indirect
“contributions” in connection with a campaign or candidate. Contributions include services
and anything of value.
Below is information on the applicability of FECA and Section 501(c)(3) to students’
proposed submission for credit of pro bono hours and written work relating to political
campaign activities. For details regarding the School's requirements for pro bono legal
work, see Section I(M).
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 29 of 135
1. Pro Bono Credit
A student’s time spent volunteering for a political campaign may be credited toward the
Harvard Law School pro bono service requirement under the following conditions:
a) As set forth in Harvard Law School policy, service on political campaigns should
continue to be one of a broad array of service-related pro bono activities (including
work for nonprofit organizations, charities, NGOs, government entities) from which
students may freely choose.
b) Faculty and staff should take care not to steer students to a campaign as a means of
satisfying the pro bono requirement.
c) Harvard Law School should administer the award of credit in an evenhanded,
politically neutral manner.
d) Students, faculty and staff should not use University resources in undertaking the
political activity.
2. Written Work Credit
The question whether Harvard Law School may award academic credit for written work
relating to campaign activity presents more complications because work for academic
credit is typically more likely to involve the use of Harvard resources, including faculty
involvement and assistance. It is one thing for a student to receive writing supervision and
credit for independently pursuing an issue that arose in connection with their campaign
activity; it is another for a student to receive writing supervision and credit for work
conducted for use by a campaign. Awarding of academic credit for written work drawing
on campaign experience is appropriate, but only under the following conditions:
a) A student may receive academic credit for, and faculty may supervise, a writing
project that arises out of campaign-related activities, provided the work is not
directed by, prepared for, or to be submitted to a political campaign or any
individual working with a campaign.
b) All written work submitted for academic credit must comply with the ordinary
terms and conditions Harvard Law School imposes for granting writing credits, as
stated in this Handbook.
c) Faculty and staff should take care not to steer students to a campaign as a means of
obtaining writing credits.
d) Harvard Law School should administer the award of credit for written work in an
evenhanded, politically neutral manner.
Finally, whether Harvard Law School would be viewed as participating indirectly or
directly in a campaign will depend on the facts giving rise to the particular request. For
more information, visit the Office of the General Counsel website.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 30 of 135
O. Class Attendance and Participation; Overlapping Class
Times
Class work is essential to the educational program at the Law School. Regular, in-person
attendance at classes and clinics, participation in class and clinic work, and compliance
with rules and norms for classrooms and clinics, are expected of all students. In the case of
substantial delinquency in attendance, unsatisfactory performance of clinic
responsibilities, or failure to comply with classroom or clinic rules and norms, the Law
School may, after written notice, involuntarily withdraw a student from the course or clinic
in question.
Students who believe they need to miss classes for an extended period of time must speak
with the Dean of Students who can assist with such situations and can help students
comply with the Law School’s attendance policy and related academic policies. In most
cases, a student’s absence from all of their classes for more than two weeks will be cause
for a leave of absence and administrative withdrawal from all courses. The permissible
period of absence for short courses and winter term courses will be less than two weeks.
Students will not receive credit for courses (including courses taken through cross-
registration), clinics, seminars, or reading groups with meeting times that overlap in whole
or in part. Students must also allow for sufficient travel time between classes. Students
may not make arrangements with faculty members to arrive late or leave early from a class.
Pursuant to the requirements of the law set forth in Chapter 151C, Section 2B of the
Massachusetts General Laws, a copy of this section is printed in full:
Any student in an educational or vocational training institution, other than a religious or
denominational educational or vocational training institution, who is unable, because of his
religious beliefs, to attend classes or to participate in any examination, study, or work
requirement on a particular day shall be excused from any such examination or study or
work requirement, and shall be provided with an opportunity to make up such
examination, study, or work requirement which he may have missed because of such
absence on any particular day; provided, however, that such makeup examination or work
shall not create an unreasonable burden upon such school. No fees of any kind shall be
charged by the institution for making available to the said student such opportunity. No
adverse or prejudicial effects shall result to any student because of their availing
themselves of the provisions of this section.
Students anticipating missing class should consult the Law School’s Class Recording Policy
which is available in Section XII(F).
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 31 of 135
P. Grades for J.D. Students
1. Honors, Pass, Low Pass, or Fail Grades
All Law School courses, seminars, clinics and written workwith the exception of courses
offered Credit/Fail—will be graded Honors, Pass, Low Pass, or Fail (“H, P, LP, or F”).
2. Dean’s Scholar Prizes
Dean’s Scholar Prizes (represented on the transcript as an H*) may be awarded in
recognition of outstanding work in classes and clinics with seven or more Law School J.D.
and LL.M. students following the add/drop period. Dean’s Scholar Prizes may not be
awarded in courses or clinics graded on a Credit/Fail basis, or for any writing credits and
independent clinics.
3. Credit/Fail Grades
a) All reading groups and independent clinics will be graded on a Credit/Fail
basis. Faculty may not award Credit/Fail grades without prior consultation with the
Dean for Academic and Faculty Affairs.
b) All work done at foreign institutions as part of the Law School’s study abroad
programs will be reflected on the student’s transcript on a Credit/Fail basis.
Q. Extensions
1. Extensions are available for required coursework (excluding exams) or papers only
with the approval of the faculty member or instructor, or the Dean of Students in
consultation with the faculty member or instructor in cases of personal or medical
emergency. See Section VIII(B). The due date is established in coordination with
the student and faculty member or instructor, and the Dean of Students office when
appropriate. In order to track the progress of student papers in a course or written
work for which an extension has been given, the Law School uses an “Extension”
(EXT) transcript notation. Students who have an approved extension will receive an
EXT notation on the transcript until the work is completed and graded. EXT
notations must be resolved by no later than the last day of classes of the semester
(fall or spring) that follows the originally scheduled completion of the course or
written work or earlier deadline as set by the faculty member or instructor. If a
student fails to complete the work by that date or to receive a further extension, the
Registrar’s Office generally will withdraw the student from the course or written
work and enter a WD on the transcript However, if failure to complete credits for a
course or written work will result in a student dropping below the semester or year
required credit minimum, the student must complete the work or receive an F
grade.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 32 of 135
2. First and second-year J.D. students should note that course, seminar, or writing
credits with EXT notations may not be used to meet any credit requirements in the
following year(s).
3. If a student has an EXT at the end of the academic year, and, as a result, has not
completed the minimum number of required credits for the year, the student will be
ineligible for the grade-based Sears Prizes and Morgan and Helen Chu Prizes, and
may not be eligible for clinical student court practice certification. 1L students must
complete the first-year requirements, including the spring upper-level elective
course to be eligible; 2L students must complete 24 graded credits for the year, of
which no fewer than 18 are for law school work, to be eligible. (See Section I(C),
Section I(D), and Section I(J)).
R. Grade Changes
After an instructor has submitted a grade to the Registrar, the instructor may change the
grade only if the grade is incorrect as a result of an arithmetical, administrative, or other
mechanical error. The instructor will determine whether or not the grade is a result of
such an error. The Dean for Academic and Faculty Affairs must approve any grade changes
pursuant to this policy.
An instructor’s grade determination is not subject to review on the merits by the Dean,
Deputy Deans, the Dean of Students, the Registrar, or other administrators. An instructor
may not change a grade based on a reevaluation of a student’s work, except by requesting
and obtaining approval for such change from the faculty.
After degrees are voted and approved by the faculty, grades for graduating students cannot
be changed by an individual faculty for any reason.
Under the circumstances specified in the Standing Policies of the Administrative Board
Concerning Exam Administration a student may be entitled to grading relief for a grade
affected adversely by an administrative irregularity (for example, a failure of exam
software). The procedures for seeking such relief are set out in those Policies. Grade
changes may also be made by the School’s administration as the result of a disciplinary
proceeding against a student.
Questions about grading policies and their application in particular instances can be
directed to the Registrar’s office or the Dean of Student’s office.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 33 of 135
S. Completion of Course Evaluations and Grade Release
Course evaluations provide valuable feedback about the curriculum to faculty,
administrators, and students. To encourage submission of evaluations, students who
complete and submit all of their course evaluations in a given term will receive grades for
that term one or more weeks prior to students who do not submit all course evaluations.
This policy does not apply to graduating students in their final term.
T. Graduation with Honors
1. A student who completes the requirements for the J.D. degree with distinction will
receive the degree with one of the following Latin honors: cum laude, magna cum
laude, or summa cum laude.
2. Latin honors at graduation will be based on the average of the three annual grade
point averages (GPA). GPA will be calculated for each year of study and then
averaged across the three years to determine Latin honors.
3. (a) The annual GPA will be calculated by assigning the following values to grades:
Honors: 4; Pass: 3; Low Pass: 2; Fail: 0. Dean’s Scholar Prize awards will carry an
additional point.
(b) For all students, in calculating annual GPAs, each grade, including the Dean's
Scholar Prize, is weighted in accordance with the number of credits earned in the
course.
4. The summa cum laude will be determined by the requirement of a 4.75 GPA. The
honor is exact and does not involve "rounding off"; i.e., a GPA of 4.749 does not
result in a degree summa cum laude. If, in a given year, no student earns a GPA of
4.75 or higher, summa cum laude will be awarded to the student (or students in the
case of a tie) with the highest overall GPA.
5. The magna cum laude will be awarded to the next ten percent of the entire class.
6. The cum laude will be awarded to the next 30 percent of the entire class.
7. All students who are tied at the margin of a percentage required for Latin honors
will be deemed to have achieved the required percentage for the appropriate Latin
honors. Students who graduate in November, February or March will be granted
Latin honors to the extent that students with the same GPAs received Latin honors
the previous May.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 34 of 135
8. The following are not included in Latin honors calculations for any student:
a) Credit/Fail courses, including study abroad courses.
b) Cross-registration courses.
c) Clinical work or written work done after a student has completed the
maximum credits as noted in Section I(D)(2).
d) Courses taken outside of Harvard Law School through a Law School joint or
coordinated degree program.
e) Courses taken through the Berkeley Exchange Program or the Program for
Third-Year Visits.
f) Grades earned in law school prior to matriculation to Harvard Law School.
g) "Withdrew after Deadline" (WD) notations.
9. Latin Honors Calculation for J.D. Students with Spring Term 2020 Credit/Fail Grades
Because of the Pandemic:
The ordinary basis for the award of Latin Honors may be found in Section I(T),
subsections 1-8 of this Handbook. For spring 2020, HLS adopted a mandatory
Credit/Fail grading system due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic that required the
completion of the school year remotely. The following describes how Latin Honors
calculations will be adjusted in light of the temporary mandatory grading scheme.
For students enrolled as 1Ls in spring 2020, the calculation for the award of Latin
honors at the time of graduation will be a weighted average of the GPA for each of
the three years of study, with a weighting factor of 50% given to the GPA for the 1L
year.
For upper-level J.D. students enrolled in spring 2020, the calculation for the award
of Latin honors at the time of graduation will be a weighted average of the GPA for
each of the years in which HLS grades were received:
a) Full weight will be given to the years in which grades were received in all
terms.
b) The Law School will calculate the overall GPA for Latin honors three different
ways for each student using three different weighting calculations for 2019-
20 in relation to the other years in which HLS grades were received.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 35 of 135
c) The three weighted factors will be:
i) 50%;
ii) 60%; and
iii) an individualized percentage for each student, calculated by dividing
the number of graded credits the student completed in 2019-20 that
are included in the calculation of Latin honors in the ordinary course
by the student’s total number of credits in enrolled courses that are or
would have been included in the Latin honors calculation in the
ordinary course.
d) In assessing Latin honors for students who were enrolled for the Spring
Term 2020, students who qualify for honors under any one of the
calculations, regardless of which one, will receive the respective honors
designation associated with their best outcome. In other words, under this
approach, we will calculate GPAs three independent ways, creating three
different GPA pools. Students falling into the top 10% in any of the three
pools will receive magna cum laude honors, and students falling into the next
30% in any of the three pools will receive cum laude honors.
U. Satisfactory Academic Progress
1. Minimum Grades for J.D. Students
a) The minimum grade required for completion of the J.D. credit requirements is a
grade of Credit in the first-year January Experiential Term course and a grade of
Low Pass in all other required courses and for the total number of credits required
for the J.D. degree (see Section I(C), Section I(D), and Section I(J)), with the
exception of coursework taken outside of the Law School for which the minimum
grade is a grade of C or its equivalent.
b) Papers written to satisfy the J.D. Written Work Requirement must receive a grade
of Low Pass or better with the exception of papers written for courses graded
Credit/Fail which must receive a grade of Credit.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 36 of 135
2. Minimum Annual Progress for J.D. Students
a) First Year
i) Satisfactory completion of the first-year programconsisting of the required
1L courses (see Section I(C)(1-3)) and the required upper-level elective
credits (see Section I(C)(4)) requires a grade of at least a Low Pass in
every course, with the exception of the first-year January Experiential Term
course in which students must receive a grade of Credit.
ii) Subject to Section I(U)(2)(f) below and Section I(V), a student receiving a
grade of Fail in any required course in the first year, in order to maintain
minimum annual progress, must make up the failed credits in that course
during their second year by enrolling in and passing a different instance of
the course or by earning a passing grade on an examination in a different
instance of the course.
iii) Subject to Section I(U)(2)(f) below and Section I(V), a student receiving a
grade of Fail in the spring upper-level elective course must make up the
failed credits in that course during the second year by enrolling in and
passing a different instance of the course, earning a passing grade on an
examination in a different instance of the same course, or by taking a
different course in order to maintain their minimum annual progress.
iv) Credits for retaking a course, passing a different exam in a different instance
of the same course, or taking a different elective course, in order to complete
first-year work are not counted for purposes of meeting the minimum credit
requirements for the second year.
b) Second Year
The following minimum requirements must be met:
i) Grades of Low Pass or better in the minimum number of required credits for
the second year of study (see Section I(C), Section I(D), and Section I(J).
Credits for retaking a course or taking a different course in order to make up
failed upper-level credits are counted for this purpose.
ii) Subject to Section I(V), a student receiving a grade of Fail in a second-year
course must make up the failed credits by enrolling in and passing a different
instance of the course, earning a passing grade on an examination in a
different instance of the same course, or taking a different course, and has
the option of not making up the failed credits if the credits are not needed for
the semester or annual minimums.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 37 of 135
iii) Special dispensation to continue in the Law School after the second year of
residence without having met these requirements may be granted by the
Administrative Board under such terms as it deems appropriate.
c) Third Year
If the minimum grade requirements for the J.D. degree have not been met after
completing three years of residency (see Section I(U)(1)) the following may be
used to meet the degree requirements:
i) Additional courses may be taken to meet necessary degree requirements.
Degree requirements must be completed within seven years of matriculation.
See Section I(A)(3).
ii) Subject to Section I(V), if a failing grade is the reason for failure to meet the
degree requirements, a student may meet degree requirements by enrolling
in and passing a different instance of the course, earning a passing grade on
an examination in a different instance of the same course, or taking a
different course, or in another manner approved by the Administrative
Board.
d) International and Comparative Law Course Requirement
Subject to Section I(V), a student receiving a grade of Fail in a course taken to
satisfy the International and Comparative Law Course Requirement must make up
the failed credits by enrolling in and passing a different instance of the course,
earning a passing grade on an examination in a different instance of the same
course, or taking a different qualifying international and comparative law course.
e) Legal Profession Course (Professional Responsibility Requirement)
Subject to Section I(V), a student receiving a grade of Fail in the required Legal
Profession course must make up the failed credits in that course by enrolling in and
passing a different instance of the course, earning a passing grade on an
examination in a different examination instance of the same course, or taking a
different Legal Profession course in order to meet the School’s Professional
Responsibility Requirement.
f) Negotiation/Leadership Requirement
Subject to Section I(V), a student receiving a grade of Fail in a course or clinic taken
to satisfy the Negotiation/Leadership Requirement must make up the failed credits
by enrolling in and passing a different instance of the course or clinic, earning a
passing grade in a different instance of the same course or clinic, or taking a
different qualifying Negotiation/Leadership course or clinic.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 38 of 135
g) Minimum G.P.A./Two or More Failing Grades
Any student receiving a grade point average of lower than a Low Pass average for
any semester, or receiving two or more grades of Fail during any academic year, will
be referred to the Administrative Board. The Administrative Board may decide, in
such a case, that the student has failed to meet academic requirements and/or is
unable to advance to the next year and may place the student on involuntary leave
for unfulfilled academic requirements (see Section X(C)(7)). Students must
maintain Satisfactory Academic Progress in order to remain eligible for federal
student aid consideration. See HLS Policy for Financial Aid Recipients.
V. Retaking Courses, Taking a Different Examination in
the Same Course, and Substitute Work
1. The Registrar, Dean for Academic and Faculty Affairs, Dean of Students and relevant
faculty members will consult to determine whether taking an examination in a
different instance of the same course is the appropriate method for a student to
make up failed credits. The Registrar, Dean for Academic and Faculty Affairs, Dean
of Students and the relevant faculty members may consult a Deputy Dean or the
Chair of the Administrative Board in determining options and appropriate method.
2. If it is determined that a student should retake a course or take an examination in a
different instance of a course, the student will be required to do so at the next
scheduled time the course or examination in question is being offered.
3. The grade for retaking a course or for taking an examination in a different instance
of the same course, or for taking a different course to make up the failed credits, if
higher than the original grade, takes the place of the earlier grade for determining
completion of J.D. degree requirements and minimum annual progress. It does not
take the place of the earlier grade for purposes of determining Latin honors (for
which the original grade will be used). Both the original grade and the grade for
retaking the course, for taking an examination in a different instance of the same
course, or for taking a different course to make up the failed credits will be recorded
on the transcript.
4. With the exception noted in Section I(U)(2)(a)(iv), courses retaken and new
courses taken to make up failed credits are included in calculations regarding
compliance with minimum and maximum registration requirements.
5. Special Dispensation: Exceptions from the rules regarding retaking courses, taking
a different examination in the same course, taking a different course and substitute
work may be granted only by the Administrative Board upon a showing of good
cause.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 39 of 135
II. Requirements for Graduate Degrees
The following section provides information on the requirements for the LL.M. and S.J.D.
degrees at Harvard Law School. Note that the information in this section relates
specifically to requirements for Harvard Law School degree completion. It does not relate
to qualification for any bar examination or other professional licensing.
A. Master of Laws (LL.M.)
1. LL.M. Residence and Credit Requirements
To qualify for the LL.M. Degree, candidates must fulfill the following requirements:
a) Attendance at Harvard Law School is full-time, in-person for a period of one
academic year, which consists of the fall, winter and spring terms.
i. Students are expected to maintain the minimum credit requirements stated
in Section II(4)(d)(i)]. To be awarded the LL.M. degree, a student must
complete a minimum of 23 credits.
ii. LL.M. students enrolled at the Law School may not be simultaneously
enrolled, either full-time or part-time, in any other school or college either
within Harvard University or at any other institution, unless they are cross-
registered in courses authorized by the Law School.
iii. In accordance with Harvard Law School policy, students may not be
employed for more than 20 hours of work per week during the academic
year while classes are in session.
iv. LL.M. students must complete degree requirements for the LL.M. within 36
months of first matriculating at the Law School. A leave of absence will not
extend the period for completing degree requirements.
b) A course of study consisting of a minimum of 23 credits and a maximum of 28
credits (including the one credit assigned for completion of the portion of the Legal
Research, Writing and Analysis course that takes place during LL.M. Orientation):
i) LL.M. degree candidates must register for between nine and 13 credits in the fall
term, between eight and 12 credits in the spring term, and at least two credits in
the winter term. In some cases, different minimums may apply for visa purposes.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 40 of 135
ii) LL.M. degree candidates may register for no more than 13 credits in the fall
term, no more than 12 credits in the spring term, and no more than three credits
(from a single offering) in the winter term. These term-specific credit maximums
include the credit(s) for required written work (see Section II(A)(6) below) and
the fall-term credit maximum includes the one credit assigned for completion of
the Legal Research, Writing and Analysis course that takes place during LL.M.
Orientation.
iii) For LL.M. candidates who do not hold a J.D. degree from a law school in the
United States (including Puerto Rico), at least one core course, of at least three
credits, in U.S. law from the following list of designated “primary” courses in U.S.
law: Civil Procedure; Constitutional Law: First Amendment; Constitutional Law:
Separation of Powers, Federalism, and the Fourteenth Amendment; Contracts;
Corporations; Criminal Law; Evidence (only those sections bearing three or
more credits); Family Law; Legislation and Regulation; Property; Separation of
Powers; Taxation; or Torts. The Committee on Graduate Studies will consider
petitions to substitute another substantive course in U.S. law. Petitions will be
considered from students who have significant grounding in U.S. law or in a
substantially similar common law equivalent (as determined by the Committee
on Graduate Studies).
c) The LL.M. Written Work Requirement (see Section II(A)(6) below).
Any questions about academic requirements should be directed to the Graduate Program
Office.
2. Recommended Courses
The Committee on Graduate Studies strongly recommends that each LL.M. candidate also
take at least one course focusing on legal history, legal theory, policy analysis or legal
process. In addition, students who hold a J.D. degree from a school in the United States
(including Puerto Rico), and who are hoping to embark on a law teaching career, are
strongly encouraged to take at least one course that is primarily focused on legal theory or
jurisprudence. Students are invited to consult with the Assistant Dean for the Graduate
Program and International Legal Studies or the Senior Director of Administration and
Student Affairs for the Graduate Program for further discussion of possible course
selections in this area.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 41 of 135
3. Class Attendance and Participation; Overlapping Class Times
Class work is essential to the educational program at the Law School. Regular, in-person
attendance at classes and clinics, participation in class and clinic work, and compliance
with rules and norms for classrooms and clinics, are expected of all students. In the case of
substantial delinquency in attendance, unsatisfactory performance of clinic
responsibilities, or failure to comply with classroom or clinic rules and norms, the Law
School may, after written notice, involuntarily withdraw a student from the class or clinic
in question.
Students who believe they need to miss classes for an extended period of time must speak
with the Dean of Students, the Assistant Dean for the Graduate Program and International
Legal Studies, or the Senior Director of Administration and Student Affairs for the Graduate
Program, who can assist with such situations and can help students comply with the Law
School’s attendance policy and related academic policies. In most cases, a student’s
absence from all of their classes for more than two weeks will be cause for a leave of
absence and administrative withdrawal from all courses. The permissible period of
absence for short courses and winter term courses will be less than two weeks.
Students will not receive credit for courses (including courses taken through cross-
registration), clinics, seminars, or reading groups with meeting times that overlap in whole
or in part. Students must also allow for sufficient travel time between classes. Students
may not make arrangements with faculty members to arrive late or leave early from a class.
Pursuant to the requirements of the law set forth in Chapter 151C, Section 2B of the
Massachusetts General Laws, a copy of this section is printed in full:
Any student in an educational or vocational training institution, other than a religious or
denominational educational or vocational training institution, who is unable, because of his
religious beliefs, to attend classes or to participate in any examination, study, or work
requirement on a particular day shall be excused from any such examination or study or
work requirement, and shall be provided with an opportunity to make up such
examination, study, or work requirement which he may have missed because of such
absence on any particular day; provided, however, that such makeup examination or work
shall not create an unreasonable burden upon such school. No fees of any kind shall be
charged by the institution for making available to the said student such opportunity. No
adverse or prejudicial effects shall result to any student because of their availing
themselves of the provisions of this section.
Students anticipating missing class should consult the Law School's Class Recording Policy
which is available in Section XII(F).
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 42 of 135
4. Grades for LL.M. Students
a) Honors, Pass, Low Pass, or Fail Grades
All Harvard Law School courses, seminars, clinics and written workwith the
exception of courses offered Credit/Fail (see Section II(A)(4)(c) below) will be
graded Honors, Pass, Low Pass, or Fail (“H, P, LP or F”).
b) Dean’s Scholar Prizes
Dean’s Scholar Prizes (represented on the transcript as an H*) may be awarded to
LL.M. students in recognition of outstanding work in upper-level classes with seven
or more Harvard Law School J.D. and LL.M. students following the add/drop period.
Dean’s Scholar Prizes may not be awarded in courses graded on a Credit/Fail basis,
or for any writing credits and independent clinics.
c) Credit/Fail Grades
All reading groups and independent clinics will be graded on a Credit/Fail
basis. Faculty may not award Credit/Fail grades without prior consultation with the
Dean for Academic and Faculty Affairs.
d) Minimum Grades; Degree Completion
i) In order to be eligible for the LL.M. degree, LL.M. candidates must complete a
total of at least 23 credits (including course work and written work and
including the one credit assigned for completion of the portion of the Legal
Research, Writing, and Analysis course that takes place during LL.M.
Orientation), graded Low Pass (LP) or higher; of those 23 credits, no fewer
than three must be graded Pass (P) or higher.
ii) LL.M. candidates must earn a minimum grade of Low Pass on the paper
submitted to satisfy the LL.M. Written Work Requirement, assuming they
have met the minimum grade requirements stated in Section II(A)(4)(d)(i)
above.
iii) Students failing to earn minimum grades necessary to meet degree
requirements may be allowed, by decision of the Graduate Committee, to
undertake substitute work, take a different examination in the same course,
or retake courses within the next academic year following the end of the
LL.M. year. All additional work must be completed no later than 12 months
after the end of the year in which the student matriculated in the LL.M.
program. Outside of the foregoing circumstance, however, all work must be
completed within a single academic year consistent with the fact that the
LL.M. is a single academic year degree program.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 43 of 135
iv) Students who have taken a leave of absence must complete the LL.M. degree
requirements within 36 months of matriculating at the Law School in order
to be eligible for the LL.M. degree. Further information on Leaves and
Withdrawals is found in Section X.
e) Extensions
Extensions are available for required coursework (excluding exams) or papers only
with the approval of the faculty member or instructor, or the Dean of Students in
consultation with the faculty member or instructor in cases of personal or medical
emergency (see Section VIII(B)). The due date is established in coordination with
the student and faculty member or instructor, and the Dean of Students office when
appropriate. In order to track the progress of student papers in a course or written
work for which an extension has been given, the Law School uses an “Extension”
(EXT) transcript notation. Students who have an approved extension on non-exam
related work will receive an EXT notation on the transcript until the work is
completed and graded. EXT notations must be resolved by no later than the last day
of classes of the semester (fall or spring) that follows the originally scheduled
completion of the course or written work or earlier deadline as set by the faculty
member or instructor. If a student fails to complete the work by that date or to
receive a further extension, the Registrar’s Office generally will withdraw them from
the course or written work and enter a WD on the transcript. However, if failure to
complete credits for a course or written work will result in a student dropping
below the semester or year required credit minimum, the student must complete
the work or receive an F grade.
If a student has an EXT at the end of the academic year, and as a result, has not
completed the minimum number of required credits for the year, the student will be
ineligible for the grade-based Morgan and Helen Chu Prize.
f) Grade Changes
After an instructor has submitted a grade to the Registrar, the instructor may
change the grade only if the grade is incorrect as a result of an arithmetical,
administrative, or other mechanical error. The instructor will determine whether
the grade is a result of such an error. The Dean for Academic and Faculty Affairs
must approve any grade changes pursuant to this policy.
An instructor’s grade determination is not subject to review on the merits by the
Dean, Deputy Deans, the Dean of Students, the Registrar, or other administrators. An
instructor may not change a grade based on a reevaluation of a student’s work,
except by requesting and obtaining approval for such change from the faculty.
After degrees are voted and approved by the faculty, grades for graduating students
cannot be changed by an individual faculty for any reason.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 44 of 135
Under the circumstances specified in the Standing Policies of the Administrative
Board Concerning Exam Administration, a student may be entitled to grading relief
for a grade affected adversely by an administrative irregularity (for example, a
failure of exam software). The procedures for seeking such relief are set out in those
Policies. Grade changes may also be made by the School’s administration as the
result of a disciplinary proceeding against a student.
Questions about grading policies and their application in particular instances can be
directed to the Office of the Registrar or the Dean of Student’s Office.
5. Completion of Course Evaluations and Grade Release
Course evaluations provide valuable feedback about the curriculum to faculty,
administrators, and students. To encourage submission of evaluations, students who
complete and submit all of their course evaluations in a given term will receive grades for
that term one or more weeks prior to students who do not submit all course evaluations.
This policy does not apply to graduating students in their final term.
6. LL.M. Written Work Requirement
All LL.M. candidates must satisfy the Written Work Requirement for the LL.M. degree. To
fulfill this requirement, LL.M. students must complete a paper that involves independent
reflection, formulation of a sustained argument, and, in many cases, in-depth research. The
paper must be an individual effort: group papers or works of joint authorship do not
qualify. The paper may be written in conjunction with a Law School course or seminar that
already requires a paper that would satisfy the LL.M. Written Work Requirement
commonly referred to as writing “in conjunction” with a course or seminaror as an
independent paper supervised by a member of the Law School faculty (including
instructors with Law School teaching appointments). Where a student seeks to write a
paper “in conjunction” with a course or seminar, it must be clear that (i) the course or
seminar already requires a paper that would satisfy the LL.M. Written Work Requirement,
(ii) the proposed paper is not in lieu of an exam or other assignment(s) for the course
(unless such option is specified in the syllabus and is available to all enrollees in the
course), and (iii) the paper is an individual assignment and not part of a group project.
(Note: credits earned through writing in conjunction with a course, seminar, or workshop
are assigned to the same term as the course, seminar, or workshop, or in the case of a
three-credit winter course, to the adjacent spring term.) Where there is no course or
seminar in the field in which a student wants to work, candidates generally will be able to
find a faculty member who will be available to guide research in the particular field.
LL.M. students who hold J.D. degrees from a law school in the U.S. (including Puerto Rico)
must write a 50-page paper (see description below). LL.M. students whose primary law
degrees are from schools other than those in the United States (including Puerto Rico) may
select either of the two options described below.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 45 of 135
The parameters for paper length and credits earned are as follows:
25-page paper: the paper must be at least 25 pages long (including footnotes but
not including endnotes or acknowledgments) and is worth one credit if written
independently, no credit (beyond the associated course credit) if written in
conjunction with a course that requires a paper
50-page paper: the paper must be at least 50 pages long (including footnotes but
not including endnotes or acknowledgments) and is worth two credits if written
independently, one credit if written in conjunction with a course that requires a
paper
The requirement cannot be satisfied with a series of shorter papers or journal entries,
works of joint authorship, moot court briefs, or clinical work product. As the foregoing list
of exclusions is not exhaustive, students should confirm with the Graduate Program that
the proposed format meets the LL.M. Written Work Requirement.
Further guidance on the Written Work Requirement is available from the Graduate
Program Office.
Registration deadlines. All LL.M. students must formally register for the Written Work
Requirement. This registration is done through submission of a form that is signed by the
faculty supervisor. The process is more fully described below in 7(f). Students writing the
50-Page Paper, or the 25-Page Paper in the fall term, must register for the paper at the
Graduate Program Office by October 18, 2024, as set forth in Section VII(C). Students
writing the 25-Page Paper in the spring term must register for the paper by February 10,
2025. LL.M. students who fail to register for the LL.M. Written Work Requirement by
February 10, 2025, as set forth in Section VII(C), may be removed from the May 2025
degree list.
7. Additional Rules Relating to the LL.M. Written Work Requirement
The mandatory schedule for registering for, completing, and submitting the LL.M. Written
Work Requirement is set forth in Section VII(C) and Section VIII(C). The following rules
and guidelines also apply to the LL.M. Written Work Requirement:
a) Supervision: Students may ask any Law School faculty member or instructor
with a Law School teaching appointment to supervise written work. Faculty on
certain types of leave may not be available in a given term.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 46 of 135
b) Supervision by Visiting Faculty: Writing credits under the supervision of
visiting faculty ordinarily must be registered for and completed during the
term(s) of the visitor’s appointment. Note that many visitors have Law School
appointments for only one term. Students who are contemplating supervision by
visiting faculty for projects that might fall outside of the faculty member's term
of appointment should contact the Graduate Program staff for guidance on this
point.
c) Prohibition against Compensation: A student may not receive academic credit
for written work for which they also receive compensation.
d) Multiple Use of Papers: Occasionally students seek to submit one paper for two
or more courses or seminars. In such cases, the paper must be of sufficiently
greater scope or depth to warrant such multiple credit. In order to assure
compliance with this requirement, any student planning to submit the same or
similar written work in more than one academic offering must first get the
approval of the Dean for Academic and Faculty Affairs by submitting a memo
that documents the project plan. The instructors involved should discuss
appropriate ways to make sure that the submitted work meets this greater
burden. This memo must be signed by the instructors for both courses and must
set forth the way in which the paper will meet the added requirement described
in the preceding paragraph.
Once the Dean for Academic and Faculty Affairs approves the project, the memo
must then be submitted to the Office of the Registrar before the student is
accorded the requested credits. This rule applies to submission of work in any
offering whether at the Law School or elsewhere. A student who submits the
same, or substantially the same, work in more than one course without such
prior permission, will be subject to disciplinary action.
e) Human Subjects Research: Law School projects involving human subjects are
reviewed by The Committee on the Use of Human Subjects (CUHS) within the
Office of the Vice Provost for Research (OVPR), which serves as the University-
wide Institutional Review Board (IRB). Students considering projects that fall
under IRB purview, i.e., regulated research with human subjects (including
surveys or interviews) should review the University’s policies on the use of
human subjects in research available on the CUHS Website and discuss their
work with an IRB Administrator at CUHS. Note that students should allow
sufficient time for IRB review; late requests for review may not be
granted. Requests are triaged within CUHS; please email [email protected] or
call (617) 496-2847.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 47 of 135
In addition, students whose research involves the collection or storage of human
subject information must establish data security procedures that reflect the
sensitivity of the data and in accordance with the Harvard Research Data
Security Policy. Please contact ITS at [email protected] for additional
information.
f) Registration for Written Work: A student must register for the LL.M. Written
Work Requirement in advance by submitting a LL.M. Written Work Requirement
Registration and Proposal form to the proposed faculty advisor for signature
and, once reviewed and signed, submitting the completed paperwork to the
Graduate Program Office by no later than the published dates set forth
in Section VII(C). Details about the proposal will be provided by the Graduate
Program. Faculty members may require additional preliminary information,
such as a discussion of the subject matter, an outline, or a longer description. A
student should submit the Registration and Proposal form to the faculty
member, as well as any other material requested, well in advance of the
published dates set forth in Section VII(C) since faculty members may require
additional preliminary work before accepting a proposal.
g) Submission of Paper to the Library: Once the paper for the LL.M. Written
Work Requirement has been completed and submitted to the faculty supervisor,
a copy of the final paperin the form submitted to the supervisor for grading--
must be submitted electronically to the Graduate Program for electronic deposit
with the Law School Library. At this time, a Library Authorization form must also
be signed.
h) Credit Adjustments:
i. An LL.M. student writing the 25-Page Paper may seek to extend the work
to a 50-Page paper provided that (1) the student has the faculty
supervisor's advance approval for the change, (2) the faculty supervisor
confirms that the final paper significantly exceeds the original
parameters in form (at least 25 additional pages of text) and in
substance, (3) the additional credit would not cause the student to
exceed the maximum credit parameter for the term or the year, (4)
approval is confirmed by the Graduate Program and noted to the Office of
the Registrar, and (5) all such steps are completed by no later than April
19, 2025. The foregoing is the only circumstance where an additional
credit may be considered and granted.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 48 of 135
ii. An LL.M. student who has registered for the 50-Page Paper and whose
writing plans change may reduce the project to a 25-Page paper provided
that (1) the student has the faculty supervisor's advance approval for the
change, (2) the final paper fulfills the narrower scope of a 25-Page paper
in form (no fewer than 25 pages) and in substance, (3) the credit
reduction would not cause the student to fall below the minimum credit
requirement for the term and the year , (4) the student has not taken
part in the Winter Term Writing Program, (5) approval is confirmed by
the Graduate Program and noted to the Office of the Registrar, and (6) all
such steps are completed by no later than April 19, 2025.
i) Additional writing opportunities for LL.M. students include Optional Written
Work and the Winter Term Writing Program (see Section III(A)). An LL.M.
student may seek no more than one credit for involvement in a moot court brief,
and must submit a narrative describing that student’s individual contributions—
in terms of form and substanceto the final brief. In order to qualify for
academic credit, the writing must be at least 25 pages of the student’s individual
written work. LL.M. students interested in registering for moot court writing
credit should complete the required registration form, along with the narrative
description, and submit it for review to the Graduate Program Office. LL.M.
additional writing opportunities are subject to applicable rules related to
political activities outlined in Section I(N).
B. Doctor of Juridical Science (S.J.D.)
To qualify for the S.J.D. degree, candidates must fulfill the following requirements, which
are discussed at length in the Graduate Program Handbook and incorporated by reference
herein.
1. Study Plan
Each S.J.D. candidate must submit an approved study plan, including arrangements for
course work and reading lists, in the first year of candidacy. Candidates must submit drafts
of their study plans to their principal supervisors and orals committee members early in
September of the first year of the program and should discuss with them the desirability of
pursuing specific courses, selected readings, interdisciplinary study, skills enhancement
(e.g., languages, mathematics, statistics), and other academic projects in their specific fields
of study. On the basis of these discussions, must submit a draft study plan to the Associate
Director of Graduate Writing and Academics by no later than October 15, and final draft of
the plan approved by all supervisors must be submitted to the Graduate Program office, for
review and approval by the Committee on Graduate Studies, by January 31 in the first year
of study. Upon review, the Committee on Graduate Studies may request adjustments to the
study plan. These adjustments should be made on the timeline set forth by the Committee
on Graduate Studies. Once a plan has been finalized and filed with the Graduate Program, a
candidate must consult with the Graduate Program before making any changes to a field
and/or supervisor (and resubmit the plan thereafter).
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 49 of 135
2. First Year in Residence
Candidates must complete the first year of study in residence at the Law School, under the
supervision of a faculty member and an orals committee selected by the candidate and
approved by the Committee on Graduate Studies. The first year of study is spent reading for
fields under the supervision of the candidate's principal supervisor and the orals
committee and completing, ordinarily, at least eight credits of course work (typically on an
audit basis).
a) S.J.D. candidates in the first year must complete eight credit hours of course work
(normally on an audit basis) at the Law School or, if appropriate, at other
departments of the University (in which case the credits are calculated in
accordance with the Law School’s equivalency guidelines). Arrangements for
fulfilling the course work requirement must be set forth in the Study Plan. Any S.J.D.
candidate who does not hold a primary degree in law from a U.S. law school:
i) must complete at least one course in U.S. law during the first year of S.J.D.
studies if not completed during the LL.M. year.
ii) is strongly encouraged to complete at least one course in legal history, legal
process, or legal thought during the first year of S.J.D. studies if not
completed during the LL.M. year.
The content of courses pursued in connection with the fields of study will typically
be examined in the context of the oral (general) examination.
b) Attendance Policy: S.J.D. candidates taking classes on a for-credit basis must
adhere to the class attendance policy set forth above and are subject to the
protections of the Massachusetts law set forth therein.
c) Grades: All Harvard Law School courses, seminars, clinics and written workwith
the exception of courses offered Credit/Failwill be graded Honors, Pass, Low Pass,
or Fail (“H, P, LP or F”). S.J.D. students must receive a minimum grade of P in any
course taken for credit. Grades of LP or F are not passing grades for the S.J.D.
degree.
3. Oral Examination
Candidates must undertake field meetings and successfully complete an oral (general)
examination in each of the fields of study outlined in the study plan. Candidates must sit for
the S.J.D. oral (general) examination in their fields of study during the first or second year
of study, and in any event by no later than March 31 of the second year. The examination
must be completed before starting work on the dissertation. Each student and their
principal supervisor will agree on a target month (no later than the deadline set out earlier
in this paragraph) for completion of the oral (general) examination at the time the student
develops their study plan.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 50 of 135
4. Prospectus
By December 15 of the third year of study, candidates must complete and submit to the
Graduate Program a written prospectus, of between 2,000 and 3,500 words of text (with no
more than an additional 1,000 words in footnotes). The prospectus should be developed in
conjunction with the principal supervisor and other members of the orals committee, and
must have the written approval of the principal supervisor before submission to the
Graduate Program. Please refer to the Graduate Program Handbook for details about the
content of the prospectus.
5. Presentations at the S.J.D. Colloquium
Twice during the program, S.J.D. candidates are required to present their dissertation work
at the S.J.D. Colloquium. The first presentation at the S.J.D. Colloquium will be scheduled
after the prospectus is submitted, and must be completed by April 30 of the third year
(though candidates wishing to complete the program in four years should plan to complete
this requirement well before this deadline). The second presentation must be completed at
least six months prior to the expected graduation date and may take place up to 12 months
prior to the intended graduation date (preferably well before the dissertation is finalized
for submission so that the student can still benefit from feedback given at the Colloquium).
Attendance at the S.J.D. Colloquium is mandatory for all in-residence S.J.D. students.
6. Submission and Acceptance of the Doctoral Dissertation
Important: Please refer to the Graduate Program Handbook for detailed information
regarding deadlines and degree dates.
S.J.D. candidates should generally expect to complete and submit their dissertation within
three years of passing the oral examination. Dissertations based on substantial fieldwork or
archival research, however, may take longer to complete.
A candidate’s dissertation should make a substantial contribution to the existing
scholarship in its chosen area. It will do so most commonly (a) by formulating a research
problem that probes some aspect of the conceptual framework for thinking about an issue
and investigating the problem systematically from this angle to construct an original
argument, or (b) by developing a new approach to addressing a recognized and significant
problem and showing how understanding of its dimensions is advanced by this
methodology. The claim the dissertation advances should be clear and the supporting
arguments should be well structured and appropriately referenced. A dissertation that
merely surveys, catalogs, or compiles relevant literature, legislation, case material or the
ideas of others will not satisfy the standard.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 51 of 135
Prohibited Submissions: Commissioned studies, committee reports, writings of joint
authorship, and academic work, papers, or dissertations written in or submitted as part of
another degree program or academic requirement at another academic institution will not
be accepted in fulfillment of the dissertation requirement. Academic work, papers, or
dissertations written in or submitted as part of another degree program or academic
requirement at Harvard will not be accepted in fulfillment of the dissertation requirement
without permission from the Graduate Committee (and the corresponding department or
program, as applicable).
Form of Dissertation: Depending on the nature of the project, the dissertation may be in
the form of (a) a monograph; or (b) a series of at least three related essays connected with
a comprehensive synthesizing essay separate from the introduction that draws on and
establishes a general thesis supported by the other essays, and provides sufficient depth
and context such that it could stand on its own. Projects that are historically, sociologically,
or philosophically oriented are generally best served by a monographic form, but in other
cases a series of related essays may be acceptable with the approval of the Graduate
Committee.
Permission and Requirements for Multiple Essay Submissions: To request permission
to submit a dissertation in the form of at least three related essays in addition to a
comprehensive synthesizing essay, candidates must submit a petition for the Graduate
Committee’s review. The petition should be incorporated in, or submitted together with,
the prospectus. If a candidate with a project originally envisioned as a monograph later
decides to petition for approval of a multiple-essay submission, the candidate may submit a
“late petition” at that time, but in no event less than one year before the candidate’s
intended graduation date. Petitions submitted within a year prior to graduation will not be
accepted.
Note: Inclusion of essays submitted for publication prior to the supervisor’s approval of the
prospectus is strongly discouraged.
Petition for Multiple-Essay Dissertation: Whether submitted with the prospectus or
thereafter, a petition for a multiple-essay dissertation must:
set forth the substance of the dissertation project as a whole
explain why, in light of the nature and focus of the dissertation project and the norm
for dissertations in the relevant discipline, a multiple-essay format is more
appropriate than a monograph
acknowledge the requirement to include a comprehensive synthesizing essay,
separate from the introduction, that draws on and establishes a general thesis
supported by the other essays
set forth the general thesis of the synthesizing essay
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 52 of 135
specify the details of publication and provide applicable citations for any of the
essays that have been published or submitted for publication (as noted above,
inclusion of essays submitted for publication prior to the supervisor’s approval of
the prospectus is strongly discouraged)
be accompanied by a statement from the candidate’s principal supervisor
(a) supporting the multiple-essay format in light of the norm for dissertations in the
relevant discipline; and (b) if applicable, providing a justification for inclusion of any
essay submitted for publication prior to the supervisor’s approval of the prospectus,
which is strongly discouraged
A Late Petition must also set forth in detail the substance of the synthetic essay (or the
candidate may submit a draft of the synthesizing essay).
Note: While such requests when presented in a timely manner and in compliance with
the above specifications are generally granted, candidates should not assume that
requests for multiple-essay submissions are automatically granted.
7. Oral Defense of the Dissertation
Following completion of the dissertation, and in accordance with information on degree
deadlines described in the Graduate Program Handbook, each candidate must pass an oral
defense examination on the dissertation as a whole. The examination is to be given by a
dissertation defense committee, as specified in the Graduate Program Handbook. A report
on the defense must be completed and signed by each member of the defense committee
and submitted to the Graduate Program by the relevant due date, also as specified in the
Graduate Program Handbook.
8. Submission of Dissertation to the Library
Once the dissertation defense committee gives final approval to the dissertation and
corrections, if any, are made, an electronic copy of the final dissertation must be submitted
to the Graduate Program for electronic deposit with the Law School Library. At this time, a
Library Authorization form must also be signed.
As noted above, detailed specifications for each of the preceding S.J.D. degree requirements
and other relevant information, including the content of the prospectus and dissertation
completion deadlines, are provided in the Graduate Program Handbook.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 53 of 135
9. Compliance with Requirements
S.J.D. candidates who fail to meet or consult periodically with their principal supervisors,
fail to timely complete milestones or degree requirements or to timely obtain required
program extensions, fail to pay all fees each year, or who otherwise violate residency or
other requirements will be withdrawn from the S.J.D. program. Exceptions may be made in
limited cases for students with special circumstances.
Candidates who have not completed the requirements for the degree within 72 months
from the end of the first year of S.J.D. candidacy may apply for readmission to register for
purposes of defending the dissertation and receiving the degree within 24 months of the
effective date of withdrawal, provided that their dissertation has been satisfactorily
completed by that time and that the candidate’s principal supervisor is willing and able to
supervise the final work.
III. Additional Academic Opportunities
(J.D. and Graduate Programs)
A. Additional Written Work Opportunities
1. Optional Written Work
In addition to the Written Work Requirement for each degree, upper-level and graduate
students have the option of doing additional written work for credit. With the agreement of
the instructor, a student may complete optional written work for additional credit in a
course, seminar, or workshop, or on an independent basis with Law School faculty or
instructor supervision. These are excellent opportunities for pursuing topics in depth, for
exploring issues beyond the formal curriculum, for developing publishable scholarship, and
for tailoring the law school experience to the student’s personal interests.
a) Credits: J.D. student optional written work may receive one or more writing credits
and is expected to be of the same scope as a paper written to fulfill Option 1 (for
students matriculating at HLS prior to Fall 2023) or the Analytical Paper (for
students matriculating at HLS Fall 2023 and thereafter) of the J.D. Written Work
Requirement that receives the same number of credits (see Section I(L)(1)). LL.M.
student optional written work may receive one or two writing credits and is
expected to meet the standards for LL.M. Required Written work in form (at least 25
pages of the student’s individual written work, for one credit) and in substance. The
number of credits granted for a particular piece of writing must be arranged in
advance between the student and the faculty supervisor.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 54 of 135
b) Registration for Optional Written Work: (see also Section VII and Section VIII):
J.D. students must register for Optional Written Work by submitting the required
registration form to the faculty supervisor for approval and then to the Office of the
Registrar by the second Friday in October for fall term, by the second Friday in
November for winter term, and by the second Friday in February for spring
term. Forms are available in hard copy in the Office of the Registrar and online.
LL.M. students who pursue Optional Written Work must register for such work by
submitting the required registration form to the faculty supervisor for approval and
then to the Graduate Program Office by October 18, 2024 for fall term and by
February 10, 2025 for spring term. Forms are available in hard copy in the Graduate
Program Office and online.
c) Research Assistant or Teaching Fellow Work for credit (J.D. students
only): Law School faculty members and instructors with a Law School teaching
appointment have the discretion to give a J.D. student written work credit for
writing done as a research assistant or teaching fellow, subject to the following
conditions (see also Section I(L)(1) and Section II(A)(6)):
i) In order to qualify for academic credit, the work must engage students in
academic work with sufficient intellectual content and be equivalent in scope
to work that would qualify for optional independent written work credit.
Research assistant and teaching fellow work that does not qualify for
academic credit includes cite-checking and compilations or summaries of
data without analysis.
ii) In no case may a J.D. student receive academic credit for research assistant or
teaching fellow work that is also compensated.
iii) To register for Research Assistant or Teaching Fellow Work for credit, a J.D.
student should complete the required registration form and submit it to the
Office of the Registrar.
d) J.D. students should consult the Office of the Registrar with questions about
optional written work or Research Assistant or Teaching Fellow work for credit.
e) LL.M. students must consult with the Senior Director of Administration and
Student Affairs for the Graduate Program before undertaking optional written work
for credit.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 55 of 135
2. Winter Term Writing Program
Participants in the Winter Term Writing Program (WWP) devote the winter term
exclusively to the intensive research and/or writing of a qualifying paper under the
supervision of a Law School faculty member or an instructor with a Harvard Law School
teaching appointment. For J.D. students, participation in the WWP requires registration for
Option 1 (for students matriculating prior to Fall 2023) or the Analytical Paper (for
students matriculating Fall 2023 and thereafter) of the J.D. Written Work Requirement, or
Optional Written Work of at least two and no more than three credits. For LL.M. students,
participation in the WWP requires a 50-Page paperwritten independently of a course or
seminarwith the credits assigned to the Winter Term. Participation in the program is in
lieu of taking a Law School course for the winter term, and to meet the minimum residency
requirement, the research/writing done during the term must be toward the completion of
a single writing project with a minimum of two credits.
a) J.D. Students
J.D. participation in the WWP, with the credits registered into the Winter Term, will
satisfy Option 1 or the Analytical Paper of the Written Work Requirement if the
requirement has not been previously satisfied.
b) J.D. Students Special Considerations
i) Option 2 of the J.D. Written Work Requirement does not qualify for the WWP.
ii) Written work for which J.D. students registered in a previous academic year
is not eligible for the WWP in the current year.
iii) Credits for WWP projects are registered into the Winter Term only.
iv) Students should note that taking the WWP instead of a winter course
eliminates the winter term as a source of law school classroom credits.
Third-year students considering the WWP in lieu of a winter course should
first check their upper-level credits on their degree audit against Harvard
Law School degree requirements to confirm that they will meet the required
upper level 36 law school classroom credit minimum set forth in Section
I(D).
c) LL.M. Students
Students who have registered for a single written work project worth at least two
credits, such as the LL.M. 50-Page Paper written independently of a course, are
eligible to apply for the WWP. LL.M. students who are accepted to the WWP must
spend the winter term in Cambridge, working exclusively on the relevant paper.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 56 of 135
d) Application and Registration Process
The WWP registration forms for J.D. students and application forms for LL.M.
students are available online and in hard copy at the Office of the Registrar and in
the Graduate Program Office respectively. See Section VII for more information
about registration and Section VIII for submission deadlines for papers written as
part of the Winter Term Writing Program.
B. Clinical Legal Education
1. Overview
Clinics offer students the opportunity to use the analytical, negotiation, and problem-
solving skills they have learned in the classroom to assist clients and/or to develop policy
while receiving academic credit under the supervision of experienced attorneys in a wide
variety of settings. Students can enroll for clinical credit in one of the “in-house” clinics that
are permanently staffed by Law School attorneys, who are experienced in teaching and
supervising students. Students can also enroll for clinical credit in one of the “externship”
clinics, where students are placed at outside agencies or organizations, subject to visa
regulations where applicable. With the permission of a specific clinic and the Office of
Clinical and Pro Bono Programs, students may continue work on a clinic in subsequent
semesters and earn Advanced Clinical credits.
Students interested in a special area of the law not offered through existing clinics may
propose a new clinical placement through the Independent Clinical Program, which
requires pre-approval by the Office of Clinical and Pro Bono Programs, supervision by a
licensed attorney, and sponsorship by a Harvard Law School faculty member.
In order to ensure an effective educational experience, remote independent clinical
placements are only permitted in a certain set of circumstances that lend themselves to
successful remote placements.
Remote work is permitted in the fall and spring semesters only when the team with which
a student will be working is located outside the greater Boston area and:
a) the team with which a student will be working is working remotely two days a week
or more, or
b) the student has already worked with the organization, in-person, for at least three
weeks (e.g., during a summer internship or winter term.)
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 57 of 135
These restrictions apply even if the organization advertises remote student positions.
Working remotely means working from home versus working in the office or engaging in
in-person legal practice off-site (e.g., representing a client at the courthouse). Students
must demonstrate, in their independent clinic application, how the remote independent
clinical will be a successful academic, skill building, and mentorship experience. This
includes detailing the specific technological and mentoring practices in place to ensure all
legal professional responsibilities are met.
During winter term, students must work in-person, five days a week, for the entirety of the
winter term. In addition, the team with which a student will be working must be working
on-site three days a week or more with the student’s supervising attorney(s) working on-
site at least three days a week and at least one team member working on-site each business
day of the winter term. The supervising attorney must attest to their team’s specific hybrid
schedule as part of the student’s independent clinic application package.
The Office of Clinical and Pro Bono Programs will consider remote independent clinical
work during the winter term if the organization is 100% virtual and does not have a
physical workspace. Remote independent clinical work must be completed from Cambridge
to satisfy the HLS residency requirements. Please see Section I((J)(2)(c) herein for more
information on the Upper-Level J.D. Residency Requirements. HLS does not provide winter
term independent clinic domestic travel funding for remote placements.
More information about these policies can be found on the Office of Clinical and Pro Bono
Programs website.
Clinical work is a serious commitment that requires the dedication of a significant amount
of time including substantial hours during the work week. Students should consult with the
Office of Clinical and Pro Bono Programs to find out more about clinical programs or a
specific clinic.
Participation in most clinics will satisfy the Pro Bono Requirement. For more information
about the Pro Bono Requirement, see Section I(M).
2. Requirements for Clinical Credits
a) Any student seeking to receive academic clinical credit for legal practice work or a
legal externship must do so in coordination with the Office of Clinical and Pro Bono
Programs.
b) Clinical work must be legal work and involve direct legal advocacy or
representation, application or interpretation of law, formulation of legal policy, or
drafting of legislation or regulations. Clinical work should not be clerical.
c) All clinical work must be supervised by an attorney licensed in the relevant
jurisdiction.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 58 of 135
d) Clinic students are required to adhere to rules of ethics and professional
responsibility as set by individual clinics, and follow technology policies set by
clinics in conjunction with ITS.
e) All clinics must have a classroom component with the exception of Independent
Clinical projects and Advanced Clinical credits. Independent Clinics and Advanced
Clinics do not satisfy the J.D. experiential learning requirement (see Section I(F)).
f) Work on political campaigns is not eligible for clinical credit, but may count toward
the pro bono requirement if it meets certain criteria (see Section I(M), Section
I(N), and Section III(B)(5) below).
g) Students must have successfully completed their first year of law school to enroll in
a clinic.
h) Independent clinical work is graded Credit/Fail and capped at two clinical credits
for the winter term, and three clinical credits for the fall or spring terms.
i) A student may not receive academic credit for any clinical work for which they also
receive compensation.
j) Credits awarded for in-house and externship clinics will count toward the
experiential learning requirement. Credits awarded for clinical courses that are
limited to students enrolled in the corresponding clinic may also be counted toward
the experiential learning requirement. Independent clinics, advanced clinics, and
seminars with only some students enrolled in the corresponding clinic do not count
towards the experiential learning requirement. See Section I(F).
k) Credits awarded for clinical courses that satisfy the experiential learning
requirement (see Section I(F)), the professional responsibility requirement (see
Section I(G)), and the written work requirement (see Section I(L)) may be counted
toward one but not more than one of these requirements.
Please refer to the website of the Office of Clinical and Pro Bono Programs for more
detailed information about receiving clinical credits.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 59 of 135
3. Enrollment and Credits
Table 3: Clinical Credits
Term
Clinical Credits
Hours per Week
Hours per Term
Fall or Spring
2
8
96
3
12
144
4
16
192
5
20
240
Winter*
2
Full-Time
96
*Winter term clinical work concludes on the last day of final winter exams and excludes the
MLK holiday, unless the clinical placement is open on the holiday. Full-time hours are
determined by the placement organization.
a) Upper-level students may enroll in only one clinic per term. Students may earn a
maximum of five clinical credits for their work in a clinic during the Fall or Spring
term and a maximum of two clinical credits for their work in a clinic during the
Winter Term. Students may enroll in a maximum of 16 clinical credits in total during
their 2L and 3L years. See Section I(D)(2)(d).
b) Students seeking to enroll in the same clinic for a subsequent semester of advanced
clinical work may do so with the permission of the clinic and the Office of Clinical
and Pro Bono Programs.
c) Students earn classroom credits for the classroom component of their clinics and
clinical credits for the practice component. Students with questions about these
policies should contact the Office of Clinical and Pro Bono Programs. (LL.M. students
also should consult with the Graduate Program Office for additional clinical credit
policies.)
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 60 of 135
4. International J.D. Students in Clinics
International J.D. students should consult with the Office of Clinical and Pro Bono
Programs for information on which clinical opportunities are available to them.
International J.D. students on F-1 visas are eligible to participate in all in-house clinics.
Externship clinics require Curricular Practical Training (CPT). Students are required to
work with the Office of Clinical and Pro Bono Programs and the Harvard International
Office to secure CPT authorization. F-1 students are not eligible to participate in domestic
independent clinical projects or advanced clinicals with externship placements, because
these opportunities are not eligible for CPT authorization.
Please contact the Office of Clinical and Pro Bono Programs with any questions about this
process.
5. Opportunities for Student Practice
Harvard Law School seeks to ensure that students are given ample opportunities to gain
hands-on, practical legal experience during their time at Harvard Law School. Harvard Law
School offers the largest number of in-house clinics and externship programs in the
country. In addition, Harvard Law School also provides in-house supervision for a broad
range of pro bono opportunities through the Student Practice Organizations (SPOs).
Students who are not in approved SPOs and clinics shall not form student organizations
with the intent of engaging in law practice.
Harvard Law School offers several carefully designed options for students to engage in
legal practice, all of which train students to be competent, effective and ethical lawyers
while providing the supervision necessary for effective pedagogy and compliance with
relevant statutes and rules governing the practice of law.
a) Students can engage in legal work in the following ways:
i) Working within an established Harvard Law School clinic or externship. See
Clinical Programs.
ii) Working within an approved Harvard Law School student practice
organization (“SPO”). Student Practice organizations are student-run with
supervising attorneys to assist and guide students. See Student Practice
Organizations.
iii) Working within an approved independent clinical placement. See
Independent Clinical Program.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 61 of 135
iv) Working on an individual basis for Harvard Law School pro bono credit
under the direct supervision of a licensed attorney at a law firm or legal
organization or a Harvard Law School faculty member who is licensed to
practice in the relevant jurisdiction. See For Attorneys and Supervisors.
In addition to the methods stated above, students can:
i) Earn writing credit for detailed legal research and policy analysis under the
supervision of a faculty member. Independent written work projects take a
wide range of forms, from law review articles to drafting proposed statutes
to writing policy papers to advising public officials or private entities. Those
projects may also include various sorts of public policy analysis, historical
research, and empirical work so long as they include the completion of an
appropriate written work product. See Section I(L). Written work for
academic credit may not constitute the practice of law. Questions should be
directed to the Office of Clinical and Pro Bono Programs.
ii) Students may also gain practice experience under the supervision of outside
attorneys by volunteering individually on a non-credit basis for those
attorneys, but shall not in any way hold themselves out as doing so as part of
a Harvard Law School student group or under the Harvard Law School name.
In these circumstances, it is the responsibility of the student and the
supervising attorney to ensure compliance with all work eligibility
requirements and professional obligations.
b) Harvard Law School student organizations that are not approved SPOs shall not
under any circumstances engage in the practice of law in any form. Disregard for
this policy will subject the student organization to dissolution procedures.
i) Only approved SPOs and clinics (where an in-house attorney supervisor is
provided through a clinic or a stand-alone SPO) may seek out or accept
projects that constitute legal practice or otherwise practice law using the
Harvard name.
ii) Student organizations may present conferences, panels, and other events and
bring in speakers. Members of such organizations may talk generally with
others about their practice experiences as long as they comply with
professional rules governing client confidences.
iii) Creating a new SPO or clinic requires an investment of resources to hire
supervising attorney(s), provide space, and ensure data security and client
confidentiality. Students are encouraged to work within existing clinics and
SPOs. Funding to start an SPO or a new clinic comes from the Law School
budget and not through the student funding board or the Dean of Students
Office. Such requests are weighed against on-going requests to support
existing clinics and SPOs. Please contact the Office of Clinical and Pro Bono
Programs for more information.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 62 of 135
c) Standards of professional behavior for law students.
As current (for some LL.M. students) and future practicing lawyers, law students
have standards of professional behavior and responsibilities. Please be advised that
every state, including the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, has statutes and rules
that prohibit the “unauthorized practice of law.” (See, e.g., Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 221
§41; Mass. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 5.5)
The practice of law is broadly defined and can include providing advice, in addition
to direct representation. Just as one must get a license to practice medicine, one
must be admitted to the bar in a particular state to be able to practice law. Law
students are permitted to do legal work for clients as long as the student is working
as an individual supervised by an attorney admitted to practice law in the relevant
jurisdiction and that attorney takes responsibility for the legal work. Engaging in the
unauthorized practice of law may result in criminal penalties, including fines and
imprisonment. See Massachusetts Conveyancers Ass’n, Inc. v. Colonial Title & Escrow,
Inc., 2001 WL 669280 (Mass.Super. 2001) (whether a particular activity constitutes
the practice of law is fact specific); Matter of Shoe Manufacturers Protective
Association, 295 Mass. 369, 372 (1936).
Harvard Law School students are required to comply with rules regarding the
practice of law and the Law School’s policies regarding engagement in the practice
of law while enrolled at the Law School. These rules ensure proper supervision and
compliance with applicable legal requirements. Violation of the rules on the
unauthorized practice of law may result in disciplinary proceedings before the
Administrative Board and may interfere with eligibility for admission to the bar.
C. Cross-Registration
1. Cross-Registration from Harvard Law School
a) Overview: Cross-registration for Harvard Law School students extends to all
Harvard schools with the exception of the Division of Continuing Education
(Harvard Extension School). Law School students also may cross-register at M.I.T.
and the Fletcher School at Tufts University. Students are responsible for knowing
the cross-registration policies and procedures of the Law School and of the school
offering the course. Cross-registration must be completed by published deadlines at
the beginning of the semester in which the course is offered and by the dates posted
in the Law School Cross-Registration Calendar. A cross-registration petition may not
be filed later in the year and operate retroactively. Students interested in cross-
registering should submit petitions through my.Harvard.edu. Individual school
courses and cross-registration policies and dates are available under the Cross
Registration and Enrollment Dates tab of the Harvard University Course Catalog.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 63 of 135
b) Requirements: A student must be a currently registered, full-time student of
Harvard Law School in order to cross-register. Any upper-level J.D. and LL.M.
student may cross-register for courses according to these terms:
i) For eligibility to cross-register, upper-level J.D. students must enroll in at
least eight Harvard Law School credits of law school work, of which no fewer
than four per semester must be law school classroom credits and/or clinical
credits that qualify for experiential learning. See Section I(D). When cross-
registering, students are required to meet the Law School fall and spring
semester residency minimum of ten credits, which will include the cross-
registration credits converted to Harvard Law School credits.
ii) LL.M. students may apply to cross-register for graduate-level courses related
to a program of law study at any of the schools specified in the Overview
section above. To do so, LL.M. students must seek approval from the Senior
Director of Administration and Student Affairs for the Graduate
Program through the cross-registration petition process; cross-registration
may be completed only after such approval has been granted. No law school
credit is awarded for language, field, or studio courses, or for courses not
reasonably related to a program of law study.
iii) Only those S.J.D. students who are in the first year of the S.J.D. program and
who are eligible to take courses for credit are able to cross-register for credit.
Where both conditions have been met, S.J.D. students should consult with
their faculty supervisors before starting the cross-registration process.
c) Process and Approval: It is important to note that host school faculty approval
does not guarantee enrollment in the course. If the faculty member approves, the
student’s request will be forwarded to the host school’s Registrar’s Office. The host
school’s Registrar’s Office will enroll the student if appropriate given the school’s
policies for cross-registration. Students who plan to cross-register for a course
should maintain a full schedule of Law School course credits until courses requested
through cross-registration are confirmed. Following confirmation, cross-registering
students will be permitted to drop a course at HLS without penalty, provided that
the student does so immediately following host school confirmation.
d) Credits: Harvard Law School allows up to 12 credits of cross-registration toward
the J.D. degree and up to six credits of eligible cross-registration toward the LL.M.
degree. J.D. students may enroll in up to six credits of cross-registration per
semester. The number of credits for a course will be assigned by the Law School
Registrar’s Office in accordance with ABA standards. For J.D. students, studio and
field courses are generally limited to two credits and credits awarded for language
courses are limited to three credits (thus, in both situations, credits awarded may
not reflect true in-class hours). “Intensive” language courses (in which a full-year’s
worth of instruction takes place in one semester) may receive up to four credits.
LL.M. students do not receive degree credit for language courses, studio courses,
field courses, or courses not reasonably related to a program of law study.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 64 of 135
e) Course Scheduling, Content, and, Grades: The content of a cross-registered
course may not duplicate or overlap course work taken previously or
contemporaneously. The meeting time of the cross-registered course may not
overlap with, or abut, the meeting time of courses on the student’s Law School
schedule, and students must allow for sufficient travel time between schools.
Students may not make arrangements with faculty members to arrive late or leave
early from a class.
Grades awarded by the school offering the cross-registered course are the grades of
record for the Law School transcript. Credits earned in cross-registered courses
generally count toward Harvard Law School degree requirements; however, the
grades do not count in Latin honors calculations for J.D. students.
Most schools do not allow graduate or cross-registered students to take courses
pass/fail. Students may not negotiate pass/fail grading separately with faculty, and
any offer of pass/fail grading from the course instructor will be verified by the Law
School Registrar’s Office. Any questions regarding the grading policies of a school
should be directed to the respective Registrar’s Office.
f) Academic Work, Examinations: The Harvard schools generally operate on the
same academic calendar. However, schools continue to offer individualized course
and exam schedules that affect daily class times, add/drop deadlines, exams, and
credits. All academic work for a cross-registered course must be completed in the
term in which the course is taken. Students should review the course and exam
schedule of each school into which they plan to cross-register. Students are
responsible for taking the examination(s) in a cross-registered course when
scheduled by the school offering the course. Requests to defer examinations in any
course, including cross-registered courses, will not be granted except as specified in
the Law School's Deferred Examination Policy. See Section IV(B). In addition, the
examination policies and procedures of the school offering the course must be
observed.
Note: Degree candidates should plan carefully to complete all academic work and
exams in cross-registered courses on schedule to avoid delay in receipt of final
grades that may jeopardize clearance for Harvard Law School graduation.
g) Cross-Registration Deadlines: Harvard Law School students should follow the
deadlines listed on the Law School Cross-Registration Calendar. Note that students
are responsible for notifying the Harvard Law School Registrar’s office of any
dropped cross-registration courses by the appropriate deadline. Failure to do so
may result in a “Withdrew after Deadline (WD)” notation on a student’s transcript.
More detailed information about cross-registration for Law School students is
available on the HLS Cross-Registration webpage or from the Office of the Registrar.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 65 of 135
2. Cross-Registration into Harvard Law School
Cross-registration into the Law School is open to all Harvard University students, with the
exception of students from the Division of Continuing Education (Harvard Extension
School), and to graduate students of M.I.T. and the Fletcher School at Tufts University.
Students cross-registering into Harvard Law School from other schools should consult with
their home school Registrar’s Office in advance of submitting a petition to take a Law
School course. For the duration of the course taken through cross-registration, a student
must be registered at their home school and remain in good standing at both the home
school and at the Law School. Students interested in cross-registering into the Law School
should submit petitions through my.Harvard.edu.
Cross-registrants into the Law School are allowed to take up to six credits or two courses at
the Law School in an academic year, audits included. Most Law School courses expect
students to have a basic understanding of legal vocabulary and the legal system. Students
must get permission from the instructor to cross-register and should discuss their
qualifications for a course/seminar in detail and in advance with the instructor. Even with
permission, cross-registrants are not guaranteed enrollment in a class until the Law School
Registrar’s Office has given its approval, which will be in part dependent on available seats.
Cross-registration must be completed at the beginning of the semester in which the course
is offered and by the dates posted in the Law School Cross-Registration Calendar. A petition
may not be filed later in the year and operate retroactively. There is no cross-registration
into the first-year basic courses in Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Contracts, Criminal
Law, Legislation and Regulation, Property, and Torts, or into the 1L January Experiential
Term courses, First-Year Legal Research and Writing, or courses satisfying the Law
School’s professional responsibility requirement. All cross-registration placements are
determined by the Law School Registrar’s Office. Students may not make arrangements
outside the Registrar’s Office with a Harvard Law School instructor to cross-register for or
audit a course or regarding grades or credit for academic work.
All academic work must be completed in the term in which cross-registration is taken and
by Law School deadlines. All examinations must be taken as specified in the Harvard Law
School examination schedule. No adjustments will be made, and Harvard Law School does
not give make-up examinations. All Law School courses and written work will be graded
Honors, Pass, Low Pass, or Fail ("H, P, LP, or F") (or Credit/Fail in approved courses) for all
students, including cross-registrants. Dean’s Scholar Prizes may be awarded in recognition
of outstanding work in classes with seven or more Harvard Law School J.D. and LL.M.
students following the add/drop period. Except in courses so designated, Credit/Fail
grading is not an option and may not be arranged separately with the instructor.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 66 of 135
D. Auditing a Harvard Law School Course
Only Harvard University affiliates are permitted to audit Harvard Law School classes. HU
affiliates interested in auditing a Harvard Law School course (excluding first-year required
courses) must submit an audit request form to the Office of the Registrar. The form
requires the signature of the instructor of the course. The form will be held in the
Registrar’s Office until the end of the drop/add period. If it is determined that space is
available in the course (there is no HLS waitlist or the waitlist has been cleared and cross-
registrants have been admitted) qualifying auditors will be notified that they may attend
the course and will be added to the course Canvas page. At the conclusion of the term,
auditors will be removed from the course Canvas page; this does not apply for S.J.D.
auditors who will remain. At the discretion of the faculty member, potential qualifying
auditors may continue to sit in the course (provided a physical seat is available) until an
official decision is made by the Registrar. Any audit request which is denied will be
communicated back to the faculty member. The audited course will not appear on the
transcript. Auditors will not be provided a transcript or any other record of having audited
a course. Approved auditors may not move to enrolled status after the third week of the
term.
If multiple qualifying students and/or other qualifying HU affiliates request to audit the
same course and there is not space to seat them all, the audit requests will be processed by
first reviewing requests from Law School students, second from other Law School affiliates,
and third from elsewhere within the University.
E. Joint, Coordinated, and Concurrent Degree
Opportunities for J.D. Students
1. Joint Degree Programs
The Law School offers the following formal Joint Degree Programs with other Harvard
Schools:
a) J.D./M.B.A. with the Harvard Business School
b) J.D./M.P.H. with the Harvard School of Public Health
c) J.D./M.P.P. and J.D./M.P.A. in International Development with the Harvard Kennedy
School
d) J.D./M.U.P. with the Harvard Graduate School of Design
The Law School also offers a Joint Degree Program with the University of Cambridge, U.K.
leading to a Harvard J.D. and Cambridge LL.M. For more information about this program
and other international opportunities, see Section III(F).
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 67 of 135
2. Coordinated J.D./Ph.D. Program
The Law School, in conjunction with the Harvard Griffin Graduate School of Arts and
Sciences at Harvard (Harvard Griffin GSAS), offers a coordinated degree program leading to
the J.D. and the Ph.D. degrees. Law students enrolled in this program are subject to the
relevant rules and policies established by the Law School and by Harvard Griffin GSAS. Such
rules and policies are available online and from the Office of the Registrar. Students should
direct questions about the School’s J.D./Ph.D. program to the Associate Director
of Academic Affairs. Questions relating to Ph.D. admissions and other policies of Harvard
Griffin GSAS should be addressed directly to the relevant Harvard Griffin GSAS
administrator or Ph.D. department faculty member.
3. Concurrent Degrees
a) Students may propose concurrent degrees with any Harvard school with which the
Law School does not offer a joint degree program. Students proposing concurrent
degrees with such Harvard schools, the Fletcher School at Tufts University, or M.I.T.
may cross-register into courses at the other school and count those credits
pursuant to the Law School's cross-registration policy (see Section III(C)) toward
the Law School's J.D. requirements.
b) Students may also propose concurrent degrees with other institutions, and may take
leave from the Law School to pursue studies at the other school. However, credits
earned at the other school may not count toward the J.D. requirements. Students
may not be simultaneously enrolled in the Law School and another degree-granting
institution as part of a concurrent degree program except through cross-registration
from Harvard Law School to other Harvard Schools, Tufts, or M.I.T.
c) All students must comply with the Harvard Law School academic requirements and
residency requirements as defined in Section J.
Further information about joint, coordinated, and concurrent degree opportunities at the
Law School is available from the Associate Director of Academic Affairs.
4. Rules and Policies
Law students enrolled in these degree programs are subject to all relevant rules and
policies established by the Law School and by the other degree-granting school. Summaries
of such rules and policies, including academic or residency requirements available online
and from the Office of the Registrar. For questions about the joint J.D. and master degree
programs, and the J.D./Ph.D. coordinated program, contact the Associate Director of
Academic Affairs. Questions relating to admissions, degree requirements, and other
policies of the second degree-granting school should be addressed directly to the relevant
administrator or faculty member at that school.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 68 of 135
F. J.D. Studies at Other Schools
1. Study Abroad for J.D. Students
Harvard Law School offers three types of opportunities for J.D. students to earn credit for
course work at a foreign law school:
a) A semester abroad at one of the institutions with which Harvard Law School has
signed formal exchange agreements. These agreements provide a designated
number of places for Harvard Law School J.D. students. The list of participating
schools currently includes law programs at: University of Sydney (Australia);
Fundação Getulio Vargas (Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, Brazil); University of Chile
(Santiago, Chile); Renmin University (Beijing, China); Sciences Po (Paris, France);
University of Tokyo (Japan); Seoul National University (Korea); University of Geneva
(Switzerland), and the Geneva Graduate Institute (Switzerland).
b) An independent semester abroad at an institution selected by the student and
approved by the School's Study Abroad Committee.
c) A joint J.D./LL.M. program in which students who are not enrolled in another joint
degree program are able to earn both a Harvard J.D. and an LL.M. from the
University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom in three-and-one-half years.
d) For further details and information about eligibility, application deadlines, and
program requirements about these study abroad programs, contact the Director of
International Legal Studies.
e) Upon completion of the study abroad program, students must provide official final
transcripts to the Director of International Legal Studies for the purpose of
translating credits earned during the program accordingly. NOTE: Students
participating in a study abroad program may not be eligible for graduation until the
official final transcript is received and credits are converted accordingly and
recorded on the student’s Harvard Law School record.
2. Berkeley Exchange Program for J.D. Students
A limited number of J.D. students are permitted to participate in an exchange program at
University of California, Berkeley School of Law during their third year for credit toward
the Harvard J.D. degree. Applications are due on the date specified in the Deadlines for
Applying to Special Programs in Section IX. Interested students should consult the Dean of
Students.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 69 of 135
3. Visits at Other Law Schools
In a limited number of cases, J.D. students may be permitted to spend a semester or a year
at another approved law school with like programs on the basis of significant academic
need or serious personal hardship. “Serious personal hardship” is generally limited to
unforeseen emergencies relating to personal or family circumstances. Living apart from a
spouse or significant other does not, in and of itself, constitute a circumstance of this kind.
Applications must be submitted by the date specified in the Deadlines for Applying to
Special Programs in Section IX. Interested students should consult the Dean of Students.
4. Coordinating Approved Studies at Other Schools
Students who are approved to visit at other law schools must coordinate with the Office of
the Registrar to provide proof of acceptance into the host school they will be attending, a
copy of their proposed course schedule, and, upon completing course registration, a copy of
their final course schedule. In addition, students are required to provide a final transcript
from the host school. For study abroad programs, students should coordinate with the
Director of International Legal Studies in the International Legal Studies Office.
IV. Examinations
A. General Examination Policy
Law School examinations are administered using the School's exam software unless: (1)
the format of the exam makes it impossible to use the software or (2) an exception for an
individual student has been approved by Accessibility Services, as part of a disability-
related accommodation. The Law School’s Administrative Board implements the School’s
rules regarding exams and, from time to time, promulgates standing policies for how it will
handle exam matters. Students should familiarize themselves with the Standing Policies of
the Administrative Board Concerning Exam Administration, which are subject to
change. All students are responsible for reviewing these policies and following the
examination rules and regulations posted with the examination schedules and for
reviewing all emails sent by the Registrars’ Office regarding exams and exam instructions.
For upper-level exams, please note some may be scheduled on back-to-back days. Students
are expected to reference the exam schedule when selecting classes. For cross-listed
courses, the exam administration policies of the School administering the exam apply.
Law School examinations are anonymous, and self-identification of any kind is not
permitted. Students should not put their name, class year, program, school, or any personal
comments that might identify them anywhere on their exam materials. Self-identification
may result in disallowance of the exam, a failing grade for the course, and/or referral to the
Administrative Board for possible disciplinary action. To preserve student anonymity,
individual faculty members do not have the authority to make exceptions to rules related to
exam arrangements and must not be consulted, through email or otherwise, about needed
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 70 of 135
alternative exam arrangements before, during or after an exam, until after grades for the
course are released. Students who violate this prohibition on faculty contact may be subject
to disciplinary procedures in accordance with the Standing Policies of the Administrative
Board Concerning Exam Administration.
All examinations must be taken and, when completed, submitted on the dates and at the
times designated on the official exam schedule published by the Office of the Registrar.
Exceptions to this schedule are made only in extraordinary circumstances as detailed in
Section IV(B) and only with the prior approval of the Dean of Students or the Registrar as
appropriate. Students who arrive late to a scheduled in-class exam after the official start
time of the exam will be considered late and treated as such according to the Standing
Policies of the Administrative Board Concerning Exam Administration. Sanctions for late
exams may include notations on the student’s transcript and adjustments to the exam
grade and/or final course grade in addition to the disciplinary sanctions provided for by
the procedures of the Administrative Board (see Section XI). Students who fail to appear
for, or complete, their exams may be placed on involuntary leave in accordance with
Section X(C).
Students should not delete any exam files until after final grades are posted.
B. Deferred Examination Policy
All students are responsible for familiarizing themselves with the deferred examination
policy. Below are the guidelines for deferred examinations as established by the
Administrative Board.
1. Deferred examination requests will NOT be granted for the following reasons:
a) Employment reasons
b) Bar review courses
c) Conflicts with a class at another school.
d) Exams that are scheduled within a short time period, except as explained below
in Section IV(B)(2).
e) Medical problems that do not seriously interfere with immediate pre-exam
preparation or the student’s ability to take the exam on the scheduled exam day.
f) Airline flights and travel schedules, vacation, and social plans; students are
expected to plan their travel/vacation/social plans accordingly.
Note: The Administrative Board does not approve deferment for research
opportunities, clinical experiences (other than as described in Section IV(B)(2)(a)(iv)
below), school-sponsored trips or classes.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 71 of 135
2. Deferred examination requests may be granted in limited circumstances as
explained below:
a) To request deferment under the following circumstances (Sections
IV(B)(2)(a)(i-v) below), students should submit a letter or email to the Office of
the Registrar at least two weeks prior to the exam, giving the reason, name of
exam, and exam date appearing on the exam schedule. Students should not
communicate with faculty prior to the exam period regarding need for an exam
deferral as this will jeopardize anonymity and is a violation of the School’s exam
policies.
i) Where a student has two Harvard Law School examinations scheduled on
the same day, one exam will be deferred by one business day.
ii) Where a student has three Harvard Law School examinations scheduled
during the exam period on three consecutive days, the exam scheduled on
the third day will be deferred by one business day.
iii) Religious observance conflict. A student who cannot take an exam at the
time scheduled for religious reasons will be allowed to take it at a
different time as arranged by the Office of the Registrar.
iv) Unavoidable conflicts with court hearings or other administrative
proceedings connected to the Clinical Programs. The student must
exhaust all means of avoiding the conflict by attempting to reschedule the
hearing or attempting to arrange coverage of the hearing by another
qualified student or attorney.
v) Conflicts with an exam in a cross-registered course (e.g., Harvard
Kennedy School, Harvard Business School); on a showing that the other
school will not move the exam, the Law School exam will be deferred.
b) To request deferment under the following circumstances (Sections
IV(B)(2)(b)(i-vi) below), students should contact the Dean of Students:
i) Illness of Student: Documentation of illness must be provided for review
by the Dean of Students Office or Accessibility Services. Documentation
can be provided by the student’s personal doctor or by visiting Harvard
University Health Services (HUHS). In cases of medical deferment, the
student will be required to take the exam as soon as the student is
medically able to according to the doctor’s assessment, and in accordance
with HLS’s exam administration schedule.
ii) Death or serious illness of a person in the immediate family or other
person with whom the student has a similarly close relationship, which
requires the student’s attention away from the Law School during the
exam period.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 72 of 135
iii) Personal emergency that interferes with an exam or immediate pre-exam
preparation.
iv) Delivery of child that interferes with an exam or immediate pre-exam
preparation (applies to either parent).
v) Unavoidable military commitment.
vi) Educational opportunities that are deemed extraordinary by the
Administrative Board, such as participation as a speaker in a conference
or paper presentation outside of the Cambridge area.
3. Procedure for requesting a deferred examination
a) Requests to defer exams under 2(b) as outlined above must be made to the Dean
of Students Office as soon as the student is aware of a potential scheduling
problem, no later than two weeks prior to the first scheduled exam, except in
emergencies that arise closer to the date of the exam.
b) In order to protect the security of the exam, individual exams are never moved
to an earlier date; rescheduling is made to the earliest time possible after the
exam was scheduled to take place. Exams will not be deferred beyond the exam
period except under extraordinary circumstances as deemed appropriate by the
Dean of Students Office.
c) Exams are deferred only as long as necessary to minimize the conflict or
alleviate the reason for deferment. Exams will not be deferred for a longer
period, even if this creates an inconvenience for the student based on other
plans. Under no circumstances will exams be deferred for a period longer than
ten business days beyond the close of the exam period for the term or beyond
the grading deadline for graduating students. Certain exams are not published in
the Law School’s exam archive and require high security; these exams will be
given only at Harvard Law School under proctored conditions.
d) Deferments based on medical reasons must always be processed through the
Dean of Students Office or Accessibility Services, as described above. An exam
will be deferred only if HUHS or a personal doctor certifies it necessary for
medical reasons. In cases where matters may be facilitated by direct discussion
between HUHS and the Dean of Students Office or Accessibility Services the
student should sign a release in the HUHS giving their permission for such
discussion to take place, and the student should be informed in advance of the
content of such communication. A release is required whether for verbal or
written communication in these instances. All exam deferral requests are
considered on a case-by-case basis taking into account a clinician’s
recommendation, and HLS exam policies.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 73 of 135
4. Disability or Medically-related Accommodations
Special arrangements to take exams with disability-related accommodations, may be
made in the case of disability or serious medical circumstances, with advance
consultation with Accessibility Services. Information about registering for disability-
related accommodations can be found on the Accessibility Services Resources webpage.
C. Retaking an Examination
See Sections I(V) and II(A)(4)(d)(iii).
V. Academic Honesty
Students are expected to abide by the highest standards of honesty and originality in their
academic work and related communications and representations. See also the Statement of
the Administrative Board Concerning Sanctions for Academic Honesty.
A. Violation of Examination Rules; Dishonesty in
Examinations
No student is permitted to use any books, notes, papers, or electronic devices during an in-
class examination except with the express permission of the instructor. Sharing of study
materials, exchange of information, collaboration or communication of any kind during an
in-class examination is not permitted and unless otherwise stated clearly in the
examination instructions, is not permitted during a take-home examination. The Law
School’s Administrative Board implements the School’s rules regarding exams and, from
time to time, it may issue policies about how it will do so (See Section IV(A)). For violation
of the examination rules or dishonesty in an examination, a student is subject to
disciplinary action.
B. Preparation of Papers and Other WorkPlagiarism
and Collaboration
All work submitted by a student for any academic or nonacademic exercise is expected to
be the student’s own work. In the preparation of their work, students should always take
great care to distinguish their own ideas and knowledge from information that comes from
other sources. The term “sources” includes not only published or computer-accessed
primary and secondary material but also information and opinions gained directly from
other people.
Responsibility for learning the proper forms of citation lies with the individual student.
Quotations must be properly placed within quotation marks and must be fully cited. In
addition, all paraphrased material must be completely acknowledged.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 74 of 135
Whenever ideas or facts are derived from a student’s reading and research, the sources
must be indicated. To understand the requirement of and process for acknowledging all
sources, students should familiarize themselves with the information in the Harvard Guide
to Using Sources.
The amount of collaboration with others that is permitted in the completion of work can
vary, depending upon the policy set by the instructor or the supervisor of a particular
exercise. Outside the context of a standard study group, students should assume that
collaboration in the completion of written work is prohibited, unless explicitly permitted,
and students should acknowledge any collaboration and its extent in all submitted work.
Students who are in any doubt about the preparation of their work should consult the
appropriate instructor, supervisor, or administrator before it is prepared or submitted.
Students who submit work without clear attribution of all sources, even if inadvertently,
are subject to disciplinary action.
In general, in completing coursework and exams, one may rely on and engage with artificial
intelligence applications (including ChatGPT and other generative artificial intelligence
tools, including ones embedded in other software and services, such as Microsoft Office’s
Co-Pilot) in the same way in which one may rely on and engage with: (a) other persons and
(b) non-artificial intelligence technologies. Thus, if a student uses an artificial intelligence
application in a manner or to an extent that would constitute plagiarism if the student were
engaging with another human or technology, such use is prohibited. By contrast, if a
student uses an artificial intelligence application in a manner or to an extent that would
constitute appropriate research conduct if the student were consulting with another
person or using a non-AI application, such use is permitted.
For example:
While preparing for an exam, a student would be permitted to email another
person about the subject matter of the exam and/or ask that person to explain a
relevant concept. Similarly, while studying for an exam, a student would be
permitted to submit a prompt to an artificial intelligence application about topics or
concepts relevant to the exam. In contrast, a student would not be permitted to ask
either another person or an artificial intelligence application to pre-write text for
the student and then incorporate that text into their exam.
During the administration of an exam, a student would not be permitted to email
another person about the subject matter of the exam and/or ask another person to
explain a relevant concept. Similarly, during the administration of an exam, a
student is not permitted to submit a prompt to an artificial intelligence application
about the subject matter of the exam and concepts relevant thereto.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 75 of 135
When writing a paper, unless the instructor has authorized some form of co-
authorship, a student would not be permitted to email another person and ask that
person to write part of the paper for the student (regardless of whether the student
copies what the person wrote verbatim, paraphrases it, or uses only part of it).
Similarly, a student is not permitted to incorporate the output from an artificial
intelligence application into the student’s paper, except insofar as the instructor has
authorized the output to be cited as a source with attribution.
When writing a paper, a student would be permitted to have an email exchange
with another person about the student’s ideas, as long as the final work product that
the student submits constitutes the student’s own work, representing the student’s
own effort and original ideas. Similarly, when writing a paper, a student would be
permitted to submit a prompt to an artificial intelligence application while
considering an idea, as long as the final work product that the student submits
constitutes the student’s own work. In both instances, any text or ideas copied from
any source should be properly quoted and cited, and any output from an artificial
intelligence application should only be used as a source with the instructor's
authorization.
When writing a paper, a student would be permitted to ask another person to read
a draft of the paper and make suggestions about the student’s spelling, grammar, or
word choice, provided the other person did not redraft portions of the text.
Similarly, when writing a paper, a student may rely upon artificial intelligence tools
(and, for that matter, for non-AI tools such as BriefCatch or the “Editor” or spelling
and grammar correction functions in Microsoft Word) to perform the same types of
functions.
An instructor may provide, for their course, rules different from those stated in this policy,
as long as the rules are (1) described in writing and (2) communicated to all students in the
course (for instance, stated in the course syllabus). If not expressly permitted in writing by
the instructor, any use of AI in a manner or to an extent contrary to the above policy will be
considered academic dishonesty and may subject the student to disciplinary action.
As with more traditional sources, students should assume that collaboration in the
completion of written work is prohibited unless explicitly permitted. Students who are in
any doubt about the preparation of their work should consult the appropriate instructor,
supervisor, or administrator before it is prepared or submitted.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 76 of 135
C. Multiple Use of Papers
See Section I(L)(7) and Section II(A)(7)(d).
VI. Registration Schedule and Course
Change Deadlines
A. Registration Overview
Students are responsible for knowing and meeting all Law School check-in, registration,
and course change deadlines as set forth throughout Section VI.
B. Check-in
1. Check-in Process and Administrative Clearance
All students are required to check in online using HELIOS at the start of the academic year
in order to provide updated Emergency, Local and Permanent directory
information. Failure to submit updated information or complete mandatory training such
as Title IX training for entering students by the applicable deadline may result in a web
hold on all registration functions including add/drop and waitlist processing.
Note that in addition to online check-in through HELIOS, all LL.M. and first-year S.J.D.
students are required to complete certain mandatory administrative clearance procedures
in person before they can register as Harvard Law School degree candidates. The Graduate
Program provides further information about this process to LL.M. and first-year S.J.D.
students prior to their arrival. All continuing S.J.D students who have received a financial
aid award package must also obtain financial clearance from the Graduate Program prior to
the start of the academic year.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 77 of 135
2. Check-in Dates and Administrative Clearance Dates
a) All J.D. students HELIOS check-in: Begins on August 7, 2024 and must be completed
by August 22, 2024.
b) New LL.M. students HELIOS check-in: Begins on August 12, 2024 and must be
completed by August 20, 2024. Administrative Clearance for LL.M students: Begins
on August 12, 2024 and must be completed by August 20, 2024.
c) New S.J.D. students in-person administrative clearance: Begins on August 30, 2024;
must be completed by September 3, 2024.
d) Continuing S.J.D. students HELIOS check-in: Begins on August 12, 2024 and must be
completed by September 3, 2024; continuing S.J.D. students are notified by email
regarding the nature and timing of their administrative clearance requirements.
Students will not be allowed to check in late or to conduct Administrative Clearance late
unless they first obtain permission from the Dean of Students, for J.D. students, or the
Graduate Program, for LL.M. and S.J.D. students.
3. Certification
Students will be required to submit certain certifications as part of the online check-in
process.
C. Course and Clinic Registration Periods
1. First-year J.D.: Students are assigned, according to their section, to the required 1L
courses. First-year J.D. students register during the fall term for the required 1L
January Experiential Term and for a spring upper-level elective.
2. Second- and third-year J.D.: Students register for fall term electives, all multi-
section offerings, and all clinics in the prior spring, and usually register for winter
and spring electives during the fall.
3. LL.M.: Students register for all courses during the summer, preceding the start of
the academic year.
4. Any student who does not register during the appointed registration periods must
wait until the beginning of the relevant add/drop period to add, drop, and wait-list
courses and clinics.
Specific course and clinic registration periods are established each year by the
Registrar.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 78 of 135
D. Course Add/Drop Deadlines
Table 4: Course Add/Drop Deadlines
Term
Add/Drop Deadline
Fall, Fall/Winter and Year-long
September 9, 2024
Winter and Winter/Spring
January 6, 2025
Spring
January 31, 2025
Certain courses have earlier add/drop deadlines than those listed above. Students should
consult the course descriptions in the Harvard Law School course catalog for information
about earlier deadlines.
E. Course Withdrawal Deadlines
1. A student withdrawing from a course, seminar, or reading group after the last day of
the course add/drop period for the term will be considered to have withdrawn after
the deadline, and the course, seminar, or reading group will be listed on their
transcript with a “Withdrew after Deadline” (WD) notation. Withdrawing from a
course or written work will not be permitted if it results in a student dropping
below the semester or year required credit minimums, unless the student can enroll
in other credits to meet those requirements. Students who do not withdraw before
the last day of the relevant course (or before receipt of an exam in a class with a last-
class-take-home) will need to complete the course for a grade.
2. Exceptions to the withdrawal policy are available only for a compelling reason such
as illness or unforeseen circumstances. Students should contact the Office of the
Registrar to request an exception to this policy.
3. See also Section I(O) and Section II(A)(3) regarding class attendance and
involuntary withdrawals.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 79 of 135
F. Clinic Add/Drop Deadlines
Table 5: Clinic Add/Drop Deadlines
Term
Add/Drop Deadline
Fall, Fall-Winter, Fall-Spring
Clinics
August 23, 2024
Winter, Winter-Spring Clinics
November 18, 2024
Spring Clinics
December 13, 2024
1. Clinic add/drop deadlines are earlier than most course add/drop deadlines. In
addition, some clinics have even earlier add/drop deadlines than those listed above.
Students should consult the clinic descriptions in the Harvard Law School course
catalog for specific add/drop deadlines.
2. The Office of Clinical and Pro Bono Programs (OCP) oversees add/drop deadlines
for clinics. Clinics go to great lengths to prepare projects and coordinate with
potential clients. Clinics depend on enrolled students to take on this work, and
therefore require that students finalize their participation earlier than is required
for non-clinical courses.
3. All clinics must be taken in conjunction with a relevant course. The three ways in
which students enroll in the classroom component of a clinic are:
a) Course and clinic enrollment are bundled together. The class and the clinic
are added and dropped together, and share the same add/drop deadline. E.g.,
Transactional Law Clinics and the Transactional Law Clinical Workshop.
b) Course and clinic enrollment are separate. Students must enroll in the course
on their own through HELIOS; the course is not automatically linked with the
clinical placement. Adding or dropping the clinic does not affect course
enrollment. A student who is unable to enroll in the course by the clinic
add/drop deadline forfeits their clinic enrollment. E.g., either Sports Law:
Advanced Contract Drafting or Sports and the Law: Examining the Legal
History and Evolution of America's Three "Major League" Sports: MLB, NFL
and NBA and the Sports Law Clinic.
c) Course and clinic enrollment are separate, but the course has reserved seats
for clinic students. Students who receive a seat in the course due to their
clinic enrollment and drop the clinic must also drop the course. E.g., Capital
Punishment Clinic and Capital Punishment in America.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 80 of 135
d) Students must work with OCP to finalize their clinic and/or clinical course
enrollments. Students who are unresponsive to OCP emails or other
communications related to registration and enrollment requirements may,
after written warning, have their clinical enrollment terminated.
G. Clinic Withdrawal Deadlines
1. A student withdrawing from a clinic after the last day of the clinic add/drop period
for the term will be considered to have withdrawn after the deadline, and the clinic
will be listed on their transcript with a “Withdrew after Deadline” (WD) notation.
Drop deadlines for clinics that span multiple semesters or multiple years occur
during the first semester of clinic participation (e.g. a Fall-Winter clinic has a Fall
drop deadline for both the Fall term and Winter term).
2. Exceptions to the withdrawal policy are available only in exceptional circumstances.
Students must contact the Office of Clinical and Pro Bono Programs to request an
exception to this policy.
3. See also Section I(O) and Section II(A)(3) regarding class and clinic attendance
and participation and involuntary withdrawals.
H. Course and Clinic Waitlists
Once the maximum enrollment for a course or clinic has been reached, enrollment is closed
and a waitlist is formed. Admittance into a waitlisted course or clinic during waitlist
processing is strictly in order of the waitlist. Students who are offered a place in a course or
clinic from the waitlist will be notified by email and must formally accept within the
specified time frame to be officially admitted into the course or clinic. Note: clinic waitlist
processing closes earlier than non-clinic waitlist processing.
For more information about enrollment in courses, please contact the Office of the
Registrar. For more information about enrollment in clinics, please contact the Office of
Clinical and Pro Bono Programs.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 81 of 135
VII. Written Work Registration Deadlines
For additional information about written work, see Section I(L), Section II(A)(6), and
Section III(A).
A. Summary of Written Work Registration Deadlines
Table 6: Written Work Registration Deadlines (see below for important details)
Type of Writing
Registration/Application Deadline
Option 1 of the J.D. Written Work
Requirement
Analytical Paper of the J.D.
Written Work Requirement (only
if completed independently, i.e.
outside of the context of seminar,
course, or writing group)
J.D. Optional Written Work
Fall term: second Friday in October (2Ls and 3Ls)
Spring term: second Friday in February (all J.D. students)
Option 2 of the J.D. Written Work
Requirement
February 1 of 3L year or the following business day if February 1 falls
on a weekend (all J.D. students)
LL.M. Written Work Requirement
LL.M. Optional Written Work
Fall term: October 18, 2024 (all 50-page papers and fall-term 25-page
papers)
Spring Term: February 10, 2025 (spring-term 25-page papers)
Winter Term Writing Registration
for J.D. Students
Winter Term Writing Application
for LL.M. Students
Second Friday in November (2Ls and 3Ls)
November 15, 2024 (LL.M.s)
Additional Credit for Written
Work (J.D.)
Fall term: second Friday in October (2Ls and 3Ls)
Winter and Spring term: second Friday in April (all students)
Upper-Level J.D. and LL.M.
Writing Groups
Fall- and Fall-Spring Groups: September 16, 2024
Spring-Only Groups: January 6, 2025
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 82 of 135
Absent express permission, no academic work, including examinations, papers in lieu of
exams, optional written work, seminar papers, exercises or journals, papers written in
satisfaction of the J.D. Written Work Requirement or the LL.M. Written Work Requirement
or revisions thereto, may be submitted for degree credit after the final deadlines specified
above. Such permission will be granted only with the permission of the instructor and in
consultation with the Registrar and Dean of Students in cases where:
1. The delay in submission of the work was caused by a serious personal or medical
emergency;
2. The delay will not prejudice the evaluation of the work by the instructor; and
3. The delay will not prejudice the preparation of the final degree list, including
awards, by the Office of the Registrar.
(See Section XII(O)) regarding graduation and payment of outstanding student account
charges.)
B. Registration for the J.D. Written Work Requirement
1. Students Matriculating Prior to Fall 2023
a) Option 1
The J.D. Written Work Registration Form with the faculty supervisor’s signature
must be submitted to the Office of the Registrar by the following dates:
Fall Term: second Friday in October (upper-level J.D. students)
Winter Term: second Friday in November (upper-level J.D. students)
Spring Term: second Friday in February (all J.D. students)
Students should present their proposals to the faculty supervisor for approval well
in advance of these deadlines as faculty members may require additional
preliminary work before accepting a proposal.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 83 of 135
b) Option 2
The Option 2 Written Work Registration Form with the appropriate signatures must
be submitted to the Office of the Registrar by the following dates:
Third-year students: First Friday in February.
First- and second-year students: First Friday in February of the 3L year
Verification signatures are needed as follows for Option 2 registration:
i) Law school course or seminar papers: No verification signature needed.
ii) Clinical Writing: The following verification signatures are needed for clinical
work:
In-house clinics: Harvard Law School Clinical Faculty Director
Externship Placements: Harvard Law School Faculty/Lecturer on Law
Clinic Director and Direct Clinical Supervisor
iii) Moot Court Briefs:
Ames - Board of Student Advisors
Other - Faculty Supervisor of the Moot Court Competition Team
iv) Law Journal Writing: Journal Editor-in-Chief
v) Non-traditional Legal Writing: Faculty Supervisor
2. Students Matriculating Fall 2023 and Thereafter
a) Analytical Paper
Students complete the analytical paper either through a course, seminar, workshop,
or writing group (in which cases regular registration processes and deadlines apply)
or through independent written work.
Deadlines for the registration of independent written work, via the Written Work
Registration Form, are as follows:
Fall Term: second Friday in October (upper-level J.D. students)
Winter Term: second Friday in November (upper-level J.D. students)
Spring Term: second Friday in February (all J.D. students)
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 84 of 135
Further information regarding registration for the Analytical Paper requirement
will be forthcoming during the 2024-25 academic year on the Writing for J.D.
Students webpage.
b) Professional Writing Requirement
Students complete registration and validation of the Professional Writing
Requirement via enrollment in, and successful completion of (a grade of LP or
above), a course or clinic designated as satisfying the requirement. No further
paperwork is required.
C. Registration for the LL.M. Written Work Requirement
(Note: Students must seek approval well in advance of the dates below, as faculty members
may require additional preliminary work before accepting a proposal.)
1. LL.M. student deadline for submitting faculty-approved registration proposal and
form to the Graduate Program Office for 50-Page Papers and fall term 25-Page
Papers: October 18, 2024.
2. Deadline for submitting faculty-approved registration proposal and form to the
Graduate Program Office for spring term 25-Page Papers: February 10, 2025.
3. Final deadline for all LL.M. written work registration: February 10, 2025. LL.M.
students who fail to register for the LL.M. Written Work Requirement by February
10, 2025 may be removed from the May 2025 degree list.
4. Deadline for changes to Required Written Work registration (per the conditions in
Section II(A)(7)(f)): April 11, 2025.
D. Mandatory Registration for the Written Work
Requirement
J.D. degree candidates who fail to register for the J.D. Written Work Requirement by the
first Friday of February may be removed from the May 2025 degree list. LL.M. degree
candidates who fail to register for the LL.M. Written Work Requirement by February 10,
2025 may be removed from the May 2025 degree list.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 85 of 135
E. Registration for Optional Written Work
To register for Optional Written Work, including Research Assistant Work for Credit (J.D.
students only, see Section III(A)(1)(c)), students must submit the Written Work
Registration Forms, signed by the Law School faculty supervisor by the deadlines listed
below. J.D. students should file the completed form with the Office of the Registrar, and
LL.M. students should file the completed form with the required proposal with the
Graduate Program Office. The deadlines for 2024-25 are:
Fall term: second Friday in October (J.D. students). October 18, 2024 (LL.M.
students).
Winter term: second Friday in November (J.D. students only).
Spring Term: second Friday in February (J.D. students). February 10, 2025 (LL.M.
students).
F. Application and Registration for the Winter Term
Writing Program
To register for the Winter Term Writing Program (WWP), J.D. students should indicate on
the registration form that they are registering for WWP and wish to have the credits for the
paper registered into the Winter Term.
1. Registration deadline for J.D. students: second Friday in November.
2. Application deadlines for LL.M. students:
Applications available from Graduate Program Office: October 14, 2024
Application deadline: November 15, 2024
Applicants notified of results: early December 2024
G. Additional Credit for J.D. Written Work
J.D. students who have approval for additional credit for a paper for which they have
already registered should notify the Office of the Registrar by:
Fall term: second Friday in October (2Ls and 3Ls)
Winter and Spring term: second Friday in April
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 86 of 135
H. Registration for Written Work for Upper-Level J.D.
and LL.M. Writing Groups
Writing Groups have earlier deadlines for submitting written work registration forms. For
further information regarding Writing Group registration, please refer to the Upper-Level
J.D. and LL.M. Writing Groups webpage and see Section VII(A).
All Written Work Registration Forms are available in hard copy in the Office of the
Registrar.
VIII. Deadlines for Submission of Law
School Work
A. Submission Deadlines for Academic Work
Table 7: Summary of Submission Deadlines for Academic Work (see below for
important details)
Type of Work
Submission Deadline
Academic Work in Courses, Seminars, and Reading
Groups
Last day of exams in the relevant term or earlier
date as set by instructor
Option 1 of the J.D. Written Work Requirement
Analytical Papers of the J.D. Written Work Requirement
(only if completed independently, i.e., outside the
context of seminar, course, or writing group)
LL.M. Written Work Requirement
Optional Written Work
Winter Term Writing
April 25, 2025 (last day of classes)
Option 2 of the J.D. Written Work Requirement
Varies depending on type of writing (no later than
April 25, 2025
Final Deadlines for Degree Candidates
(see Section VIII(B), Section VIII(C), and Section X).
November degrees: September 30, 2024
February degrees: December 19, 2024
March degrees: January 24, 2025
May Degrees: May 16, 2025
Note: These deadlines apply for all students both degree and non-degree unless the faculty
member sets an earlier date.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 87 of 135
B. Submission Deadlines for Academic Work in Courses,
Seminars, and Reading Groups
All academic work (other than exams) required by the instructor, including papers for a
course or seminar, papers done in lieu of an exam, and clinical writing must be submitted
by the last day of the examination period of the term in which the relevant offering is given
or by the deadline required by the instructor, whichever comes first. In the rare case of an
extenuating circumstance, as approved by the Dean of Students, Office of the Registrar,
and/or Accessibility Services, as appropriate, an extension of up to ten business days
beyond the regularly scheduled exam period may be granted for the completion of deferred
exams.
Extensions are available for such required non-exam coursework or papers only with the
approval of the faculty member or the Dean of Students in consultation with the faculty
member, and only in accordance with the guidelines set out in the section entitled
“Extensions” in Section I(Q) (for J.D. students) and Section II(A)(4)(e) (for LL.M.
students).
Students who have an approved extension on non-exam related work will receive an EXT
notation on the transcript until the work is completed and graded. EXT notations must be
resolved by no later than the last day of classes of the semester (fall or spring) that follows
the originally scheduled completion of the course or written work or earlier deadline as set
by the faculty member. If a student fails to complete the work by that date or to receive a
further extension, the Registrar’s Office generally will withdraw them from the course or
written work and enter a WD on the transcript. However, if failure to complete credits for a
course or written work will result in a student dropping below the semester or year
required credit minimum, the student must complete the work or receive an F grade.
C. Submission Deadlines for Option 1 or the Analytical
Paper (independent papers only) of the J.D. Written
Work Requirement; LL.M. Written Work Requirement;
Optional Written Work; Winter Term Writing Program
1. Deadline for All Students
Absent earlier deadlines set by the student's faculty supervisor, all submissions for Option
1 or the Analytical Paper of the J.D. Written Work Requirement, the LL.M. Written Work
Requirement, Optional Written Work, and the Winter Term Writing Program are due
on April 25, 2025.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 88 of 135
2. Extensions for May Degree Candidates (J.D. and LL.M.)
Individual instructors, upon advising the Registrar (for J.D. Students) or the Graduate
Committee (for LL.M. students) in writing that they believe that a satisfactory project can
be completed and that there will be sufficient opportunity to evaluate the paper, may grant
extensions after April 25, 2025 up until the final deadline of May 16, 2025 (see Section
VIII).
3. Extensions for 1Ls and 2Ls
a) Students may request an extension of one term beyond the term in which the non-
exam paper is due. With an extension, the work will be due on the last day of classes
of the following term.
b) Students with an approved extension will receive an EXT on the transcript for the
writing credits and, if applicable, any course or seminar credits with the paper, until
the work is completed and graded (see Section I(Q)). In the absence of an EXT
notation or a course/paper grade, a WD will be entered on a student’s transcript.
However, if failure to complete credits for a course or written work will result in a
student dropping below the semester or year required credit minimum, the student
must complete the work or receive an F grade.
D. Submission Deadlines for Option 2 of the J.D. Written
Work Requirement
See Sections VIII(B) and VIII(C) for submission deadlines for course or seminar papers,
clinical writing, and optional written work. For all other types of Option 2 writing including
moot court briefs and law journal pieces the submission deadlines will vary depending on
the needs of the organization, but must be submitted by the last day of classes of the
relevant academic year.
IX. Deadlines for Applying to Special
Programs
A. Joint and Concurrent Degree and Study Abroad
Deadlines
Students interested in applying for joint or concurrent degrees or semester abroad should
consult the individual program materials for applicable deadlines.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 89 of 135
B. Berkeley Exchange Program
Application deadline: the second Friday in February of the student’s 2L year. The
acceptance deadline for HLS students to commit to the Berkeley Exchange Program is June
15.
C. Program for Visits at Other Law Schools
Application deadline: the second Friday in February of the year prior to the proposed visit,
except in extraordinary circumstances. The acceptance deadline for HLS students to
commit to the approved program is June 15.
X. Leaves and Withdrawals
A leave of absence is a period of non-enrollment at Harvard Law School. Students on leave
are not considered to be working toward their Law School degree. Students who do not
return from leave and are not granted an extension of leave will be considered to have
withdrawn from the Law School. See Section X(E).
Students considering a leave should consult the rules regarding admission to the bar for
the jurisdiction in which they plan to practice regarding the affect the leave(s) of absence
will have on their eligibility to take the bar exam.
A. Voluntary Leave of Absence
Students who wish to interrupt their studies at any time before graduation may request a
leave of absence. Requests for a leave of absence may be granted by the Dean of
Students in consultation with other officers of the University, as appropriate. With respect
to a voluntary leave of absence for medical reasons, the Dean of Students ordinarily will
consult with Harvard University Health Services (which may consider information from the
student’s current and/or former health care providers, if made available by the student).
B. Requesting a Leave
1. To request a voluntary leave of absence, J.D. and LL.M. students must complete
the Leave of Absence Request form which is available online and in hard copy in
the Dean of Students Office, the Student Financial Services Office, and the Office of
the Registrar.
2. To request a voluntary medical leave of absence, J.D. and LL.M. students must
contact the Dean of Students in order to discuss the requested leave. When
requesting medical leave, students must provide a letter from a treating licensed
clinician supporting the request.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 90 of 135
3. To request a leave to attend a non-Harvard school as part of a Law School
coordinated, joint, or concurrent degree program, students must complete the Leave
of Absence Request form and should contact the Associate Director of Academic
Affairs, to discuss their academic plans.
4. All students requesting a leave of absence should contact Student Financial Services
to understand the implications of their proposed leave on their Financial Aid.
5. International students must speak with the Harvard International Office about the
effect their proposed leave may have on their immigration status, visa status, and
practical training eligibility before the leave of absence will be approved.
C. Involuntary Leaves of Absence
Under certain circumstances, a student may be placed on an involuntary leave of
absence. An involuntary leave of absence is not a disciplinary sanction. However, an
incident that gives rise to a leave of absence, whether voluntary or involuntary, may also be
the basis for disciplinary action. A student who prefers to take a voluntary leave of absence
for medical reasons rather than to be placed on an involuntary leave of absence for medical
reasons is ordinarily allowed to do so. Transcripts do not distinguish between voluntary
and involuntary leaves of absence.
An involuntary leave of absence may be required for the following reasons:
1. Medical circumstances:
a) (i) The student’s behavior poses a direct threat to the health or safety of any
person or has seriously disrupted others in the student’s residential community
or academic environment; and (ii) either the student’s threatening, self-
destructive, or disruptive behavior is determined to be the result of a medical
condition or the student has refused to cooperate with efforts by Harvard
University Health Services or other clinicians to determine the cause of the
behavior.
b) The student is not cleared to return to enrollment and/or residence at HLS
following either: (i) a hospitalization or emergency room visit that raises serious
concerns about the student’s health of well-being; or (ii) other circumstances
that raise serious concerns about the student’s health or well-being and
reasonably call into question their ability to function as a student in the HLS
environment. For more about the process of clearance to return to enrollment
and/or residence after a hospitalization or emergency room visit, see Sections
X(F) through X(H).
The decision to place a student on an involuntary leave of absence for health related
reasons is made in consultation with Harvard University Health Services (which
may consider information from the student’s current and/or former health care
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 91 of 135
providers, if made available by the student), after an individualized assessment of
all of the pertinent factors, such as: the nature of the student’s conduct; the nature,
duration and severity of the risk; the likelihood of potential injury; and whether
reasonable modifications of policies, practices or procedures will mitigate the
risk. However, reasonable modifications do not include changes that would
fundamentally alter the academic program or unduly burden the School’s resources
or staffing capabilities or, with respect to the required level of care or monitoring,
that would exceed the standard of care that a university health service can be
expected to provide.
2. Failure to adhere to the terms of an agreement to engage in treatment: The
student’s continued enrollment and/or residence is conditioned on the student’s
agreement to meet the expectations set forth in an agreement to engage in
treatment, such as following the recommendations of the student’s treatment team,
and the student has failed to adhere to the terms of that agreement.
3. Alleged criminal behavior: The student has been arrested on allegations of serious
criminal behavior or has been charged with such behavior by law enforcement
authorities.
4. Risk to the community: The student has allegedly violated a disciplinary rule of
the School, and their presence on campus poses a significant risk to safety or to the
educational environment of the community.
5. Indebtedness: The student’s term bill is unpaid and the student has not made
arrangements acceptable to the School to address the issue.
6. Immunizations: Failure to provide medical documentation of required
immunizations.
7. Unfulfilled School requirements: The student has not met an academic or other
School requirement, including without limitation, attending class or participating in
required activities, and has not taken steps acceptable to the School to meet the
requirement.
8. Failure to register: The student has not registered as required at the beginning of
each term.
The decision to place a student on involuntary leave is made by the Dean for Student
Services, Dean of Students, and/or such other person as the Dean designates in
consultation with the chair of the Administrative Board and/or other officers of the
University, as appropriate. As noted above, in the case of an involuntary leave of absence
for medical reasons, the School also will consult with an appropriate person at Harvard
University Health Services.
Students are notified in writing that they have been placed on involuntary leave. The
student may appeal the involuntary leave decision to the HLS Administrative Board, within
five calendar days.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 92 of 135
D. While on a Leave of Absence
1. Student conduct: Students going on leave are reminded that all degree candidates,
whether currently registered or not, are expected to maintain a satisfactory
standard of conduct.
2. Tuition and Financial Aid: Any student who goes on leave of absence during the
academic year is charged tuition and any applicable fees, including rent, to the end
of the period in which they are on leave. Students who take a medical leave of
absence will be refunded tuition for the semester. Students receiving scholarship or
other financial aid should consult the Student Financial Services concerning the
financial implications of going on leave. International students should consult the
Harvard University International Office concerning their status.
3. Student Health Insurance: The date a student goes on leave will affect the
student's health insurance through Harvard. For details, review the Leave of
Absence policy on the HUHSP website, or contact the Student Health Insurance
Office, Member Services, at 617-495-2008 or [email protected].
4. Attendance at another school: While on leave, students may not receive Law
School credits for classes taken at another school, whether at Harvard or elsewhere.
Some exceptions may be made with the approval of the Dean for Academic and
Faculty Affairs for joint and coordinated degree students.
5. Access to Facilities and Other Resources: Libraries and other facilities and
Harvard services normally may be used only by students who are currently
registered. Students on leave may not participate in extracurricular activities or
other University programs including on-campus employment opportunities for pay
or for credit. Exceptions to this rule must be specifically approved in advance by the
Dean of Students. If so instructed by the Dean of Students, a student on leave must
remain away from the University campus. Unless otherwise specified, while on
leave, joint and coordinated degree students, and those concurrent degree students
pursuing their second degree through another Harvard school, will have access to
their Law School email accounts, housing, library services including Westlaw and
Lexis and other University services, and their Harvard IDs will remain active.
Concurrent degree students doing their second degree at a non-Harvard school will
have access to their Law School email accounts and limited library services, but will
not have access to Harvard housing, active Harvard IDs and other University
services.
6. Medical treatment plans: Following an individualized assessment, the School may
require students who are on leave for medical reasons to comply with a treatment
plan during their time away.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 93 of 135
E. Extending Voluntary Leaves
If a student does not intend to return from leave, they should notify the Registrar’s Office as
soon as possible.
1. Students requesting to extend a voluntary personal or medical leave must submit
requests to the appropriate body as described in Subsections X(E)2-5 below by
October 15 if seeking an extension starting winter term, by November 15 if seeking
an extension starting spring semester, or by June 15 if seeking an extension starting
fall semester.
2. Any student wishing to extend a voluntary leave from one semester up to one year
must file a request with the Office of the Registrar.
3. Students wishing to extend a voluntary leave beyond one year must file a request
for additional leave with the Dean of Students. Such requests for additional leave
should include a brief summary of the student’s activities during the leave of
absence, why additional leave is required, how completion of the J.D. degree still fits
the student’s academic and professional goals, and the student’s commitment to
return by the applicable semester to complete the J.D. degree without additional
voluntary leave time.
4. Requests for leave beyond two yearseither sequential or intermittentmust be
submitted to the Administrative Board and should contain the information required
in Section X(E)(3). Please note that students who do not petition the
Administrative Board for an extension of leave beyond two years will be considered
to have withdrawn from the Law School. Students with withdrawn status for four
years or fewer may petition the Administrative Board for readmission. Students
with withdrawn status for more than four years must reapply for admission to the
Law School as a first-year student through the Admissions Office.
5. If a student needs to extend a medical leave, the student must file a request with
the Dean of Students Office and contact the office to discuss extending the leave.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 94 of 135
F. Returning to School
The general conditions for return from voluntary leave are good standing, visa clearance
from the Harvard International Office, financial clearance from Student Financial Services,
and receipt by the Registrar’s Office of written confirmation of return.
Students on a voluntary leave are expected to return to full-time registered status on or
about the date indicated on their leave of absence request form. Please contact the Dean of
Students or the Registrar’s Office for information about exceptions to this policy. Before
returning to school, a student must notify or petition the appropriate body as described
below by October 15 for a winter term return, by November 15 for a spring semester
return, or by June 15 for a fall semester return.
A student in good standing on a voluntary leave of absence ordinarily may return
by notifying the Registrar consistent with the schedule described above, although it
remains the student’s responsibility to ensure that they have adequate time to complete
the degree within the time limits established by the School (see Sections I(A)(3),
II(A)(4)(d)(iv), and III(B)).
Students who were not in good standing at the time a voluntary leave of absence was
granted and students who were placed on an involuntary leave of absence must petition
the HLS Administrative Board for permission to return to the School. Such a petition must
demonstrate that the circumstances that led to their leave have been satisfactorily
addressed and that they are ready to resume their studies. An important indicator of
readiness to return is evidence of engagement in productive activity. A student on such a
leave who is not granted permission to return by the HLS Administrative Board within two
years of the start of their leave, or who has been on such a leave for a cumulative period of
two academic years, will be withdrawn from the Law School and may not resume their
studies other than in a case of extraordinary circumstances as approved by the HLS
Administrative Board. In all other circumstances, the student must reapply for admission
to the Law School as a first-year student through the Admissions Office.
If the leave, whether voluntary or involuntary, was for medical reasons, then the student
must submit a petition to the Dean of Students Office for permission to return to the School
and must demonstrate that the circumstances that led to their leave have been
satisfactorily addressed and that they are ready to resume their studies. In addition, so that
the School may conduct an individualized assessment of their circumstances, students on
medical leave ordinarily will be required to consult with Harvard University Health
Services (and to grant permission to Harvard University Health Services to obtain their
treatment records and communicate with their treatment providers) so that a professional
assessment about the student’s productivity during their time away and readiness to
return can be shared with the School. In addition, if the School learns of serious concerns
about the health or well-being of a student who either has been hospitalized or visited the
emergency room or whose behavior reasonably calls into question their ability to function
as a student in the Harvard Law School environment, then the School similarly may require
the student to consult with Harvard University Health Services (and to grant permission to
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 95 of 135
Harvard University Health Services to obtain their relevant treatment records and
communicate with their treatment providers). (For more about the process of clearance to
return to enrollment and/or residence after a hospitalization or emergency room visit, see
Section X(H).) The purpose of such consultation is so that a professional assessment can
be shared with the School about the student’s readiness to return and function in the
student environment, with or without reasonable accommodation. Note that while the
input of a student’s treatment provider is an important consideration in the petition
process, Harvard University Health Services clinicians may have special knowledge of the
University context to which students will be returning. In all such cases, the decision
whether to allow a student to return is made by the Dean for Student Services, Dean of
Students, and/or such other person as the Dean designates, in consultation with the chair
of the Administrative Board and/or other officers of the University, as appropriate. Any
student whose petition to return from a medical leave of absence is denied will receive a
written explanation of the decision and may submit a written appeal of the decision to the
Administrative Board within five (5) calendar days, based on the following grounds: (a)
new materially relevant information has become available; and/or (b) there is reasonable
evidence of a procedural error in the decision-making process.
Certain conditions as set by the Dean of Students Office or the Administrative Board may be
required for approval to return. Students will be allowed to participate in course
preference selection while waiting on approval to return. If students are not given
permission to return, then the courses will be dropped from their schedules. If the Dean for
Student Services, Dean of Students, and/or such other person as the Dean designates, in
consultation with the chair of the Administrative Board and/or other officers of the
University, as appropriate, approves the petition to return, then the student may start to
make arrangements for their return.
Any disciplinary matter must be resolved before a student on leave of absence will be
allowed to return and, if the student has been required to withdraw while on leave of
absence, then any conditions for return after a required withdrawal also must be satisfied.
Students returning from a leave who wish to apply for financial aid must notify Student
Financial Services and file the necessary application forms by mid-April for the following
fall term, and by October 1 for the following spring term. Late applicants cannot be assured
that their aid will be available in time for registration payment deadlines.
Students who have been granted a leave and who have borrowed money through Harvard
must submit an annual loan deferment form to the Student Loan Office upon their return to
Harvard. Deferment forms may be obtained through either the Student Loan Office or the
Financial Aid Office and must be completed and certified by the Registrar immediately
following Registration. Failure to file a deferment form upon return will cause payments to
be due on loans and could affect future borrowing eligibility.
A student will not be allowed to register in the Law School or University again until all
previous term-bill charges have been paid and no loan is in default.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 96 of 135
G. Agreements to Engage in Treatment
The School may condition a student’s enrollment and/or residence on certain terms or
conditions as set forth in a written agreement between the School and the student, when
the student’s conduct or circumstances have caused heightened concerns about the
student’s safety and/or well-being and: (a) the appropriateness of the student’s continued
enrollment and/or residence; or (b) the student’s readiness to return to the Harvard
community. The agreement to engage in treatment may include, among other things,
compliance with a medical treatment plan, regular consultations with health care
professionals, communication with administrators, and limited disclosure of relevant
medical information, on a need-to-know basis, such as compliance with treatment and
restrictions on certain activities. The decision to require such an agreement is arrived at in
consultation with Harvard University Health Services after an individualized assessment of
the nature of the student’s conduct and circumstances and any other pertinent factors.
H. Clearance for Return
Clearance for Return to Residence and/or Continued Enrollment and Participation in
Harvard-Related Programs or Activities
After a hospitalization or emergency room visit by one of its students that raises serious
concerns about the students health or well-being, or in other circumstances that raise
serious questions about the student’s health or well-being and reasonably call into
question their ability to function as a student in the HLS environment, HLS ordinarily will
not permit that student to return to residence and enrollment or participation in any
Harvard-related programs or activities before making its own assessment of the suitability
of the student’s return. (See Procedure for Notice and Consultation). To better inform that
assessment, students are expected to notify both HLS and HUHS of any hospitalization or
emergency department visit. HUHS can be notified by phone 24 hours a day, seven days a
week, at 617-495-5711.
Reason for Policy
An important consideration in the HLS’s decision as to whether a student may continue in
or return to residence and enrollment is the impact of the student’s presence on the
community. A student who is injured, ill, or exhibiting disturbing or disruptive behavior
may require ongoing care. Serious alcohol- or drug-related problems, in particular, have
the potential to disrupt residential life and/or life in the academic community significantly
and impair a student’s ability to function academically and socially. Harvard Law School
regards as unreasonable the expectation that roommates, suitemates, friends, or Harvard
Law School staff will take on health care responsibilities for other students.
Any student may, of course, refuse to allow consultation between the student’s clinician(s)
and Harvard Law School, but such a refusal will not prevent Harvard Law School from
making a decision regarding a student’s return to residence or continued enrollment.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 97 of 135
Procedure for Notice and Consultation
HLS will consult with clinicians at HUHS and/or, if the student has been treated elsewhere,
clinicians at other facilities or in private practice, ordinarily with the student’s permission.
Depending on all of the relevant circumstances, such consultation may be initiated either
by HLS or by clinicians at HUHS. Notice by HUHS that a student has been hospitalized or
treated in an emergency department of an area hospital may prompt HLS to begin a
process of consultation through which it will decide whether and under what
circumstances the student may continue in or return to residence or enrollment.
HLS also may independently decide that, based on its observations or other information it
has about a student, it should initiate the process of consultation with HUHS clinicians,
which may include ascertaining whether that student has been hospitalized or treated by
an emergency department.
Consultation will be focused on the concerns raised by the student’s condition or behavior
and requirements for continued care, in order to facilitate Harvard Law School’s decision
about the student’s capacity to continue in or return to residence and enrollment.
I. Financial Implications of Taking a Leave
1. While on leave, students are not considered to be working toward their degree and
thus are not eligible to receive financial assistance, except as noted in Section
X(I)(3) below.
2. Students who take a leave during the academic year are charged tuition for the
period of enrollment, plus full insurance and health fees for the term in which the
leave occurs.
For example: a student taking a leave in November will be charged tuition
through the end of November, plus full Harvard University Health Services
and Harvard University Student Health Insurance Plan (if enrolled) fees for
the fall term, and the living expense budget will be adjusted to 3/9ths of the
full budget based on a nine-month academic year beginning in September.
Tuition is charged until the Registrar receives the Leave of Absence Request form.
Students who provide written notice of withdrawal by the dates listed below will
be charged as follows:
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 98 of 135
Table 8: Prorated Tuition Charges Related to Leaves and Withdrawals
Date
Tuition
September 30
1/9 total annual charges
October 31
2/9 total annual charges
November 30
3/9 total annual charges
December 31
4/9 total annual charges
January 31
5/9 total annual charges
February 28
6/9 total annual charges
March 31
7/9 total annual charges
April 30
8/9 total annual charges
after April 30
Full Tuition
3. Once the student’s account has been adjusted, SFS will prorate any aid package
based on enrollment, adjusted tuition, and fee information received from the
Registrar’s Office, in accordance with both federal and institutional regulations.
Students who take a leave during the academic year may be required to repay a
portion of the financial aid award since cash advances/refunds are disbursed at the
beginning of each term in anticipation that students will be enrolled for the entire
term. Students receive written notice of any outstanding balance that results from a
leave of absence and are responsible for payment in full prior to re-enrolling at HLS.
4. Any student who leaves the University with an amount due on their student bill that
is unpaid for 60 days or more may be subject to collection activities. The costs
associated with collecting an unpaid account will be added to the student’s
outstanding debt and must be paid in full.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 99 of 135
XI. Administrative Board
By vote of the faculty, the Administrative Board has responsibility for matters involving
student discipline and various powers relating to dispensations from and interpretations of
the academic rules and practices of the School. The Board's membership consists of three
members of the faculty, three students, two administrators, and a non-voting Secretary of
the Board. The Dean of Students is an additional ex officio member (non-voting). The
Secretary of the Board acts as the liaison between students and the Board. Students
wishing to petition the Board should consult the Secretary of the Board.
A. Disciplinary Actions
The Administrative Board at Harvard Law School has four categories of discipline that may
be imposed for student infractions of Law School rules: reprimand, suspension, dismission,
or expulsion. These sanctions are imposed only after the Board has voted to institute
formal disciplinary charges against a student. Students have the right to a full disciplinary
hearing conducted by the Administrative Board and a right to be represented by counsel.
Reprimand, suspension, dismission, or expulsion becomes part of the student’s Law School
file and will be placed on the student’s transcript and reported, on appropriate inquiry, to
state Board of Bar Examiners. Suspension may be for a term, a year, or any other length of
time the Board deems appropriate, with conditions on the student’s return as the Board
deems appropriate. Dismission and expulsion are forms of permanent separation from the
Law School and must be approved by the faculty.
In cases in which an infraction by a student is not sufficiently serious to warrant the
imposition of formal discipline, the Administrative Board may issue a warning. Such a
warning is placed in the student’s file but is not reported outside of the Law School as long
as the student engages in no additional violations of University or Law School rules. If a
student who has previously received a warning again violates University or Law School
rules, the Law School may disclose the initial warning outside the Law School and/or may
impose more serious discipline for the subsequent violation than might otherwise have
been imposed.
In past years, there have been occasions when students “sat in” or obstructed access to
administrative offices, faculty offices, and other school facilities as a form of protest. The
Administrative Board imposed the sanction of a “reprimand” for such conduct in the spring
of 2001. Students are on notice that such conduct may result in a significant disciplinary
sanction.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 100 of 135
B. Procedures for Disciplinary Cases*
*Except for cases covered under the Harvard University Title IX Policies and Procedures and
for cases covered under the University Committee on Rights and Responsibilities Fact-Finding
Procedures. See Section XII(B) and the University Committee on Rights and Responsibilities:
Fact-finding Procedures, respectively.
The Administrative Board is the Law School committee responsible for the administration
of discipline. Cases requiring discipline typically involve cheating, false statements on
financial aid applications, and similar departures from generally accepted standards of
integrity. In such cases the Board may impose sanctions including reprimand and
suspension. In the most severe cases, the Board may recommend to the faculty sanctions of
expulsion or dismission, imposition of which requires the vote of two-thirds of the faculty.
The Board does not consider itself to be an adversarial or prosecutorial body. Its
disposition is to handle matters that come before it as favorably to students as possible
consistent with the maintenance of the high academic and ethical standards of Harvard
Law School. In many instances matters that come to the Board’s attention can be dealt with
informally, without ever initiating disciplinary process. To this end, the Chairperson or
Secretary or such other person as the Chairperson designates may investigate a matter for
purposes of determining whether it should be treated as disciplinary. In those cases in
which disciplinary proceedings are required, the Board will proceed in accordance with the
following rules:
1. The Board shall initiate formal proceedings by a written charge that explains the
nature of the disciplinary infraction. Such charge shall issue only if the Board
believes it is reasonably likely that the charged infraction can be established by clear
and convincing evidence.
2. In any formal disciplinary matter, the student has a right to a hearing before the
Board. Disciplinary hearings will normally be private, but at the student’s option
and subject to the Board’s approval, the hearing shall be public and shall be held in a
room sufficiently large, in the judgment of the Board’s Chairperson, to accommodate
an audience of reasonable size.
3. Disciplinary cases are normally heard by the full Administrative Board. The student
may ask any individual member of the Board to recuse themselves for cause. To the
extent feasible, a faculty or administrative member who recuses or is otherwise
unable to serve shall be replaced by an alternate member.
4. All students against whom formal disciplinary proceedings have been initiated may
appear with legal counsel or lay advisor. The Board will attempt to assist a student
who needs and desires but cannot afford counsel.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 101 of 135
5. A record of the hearing shall be kept, either by stenographic transcript or recording,
and shall be made available without charge to the student or their representative on
request.
6. At the hearing the evidence against the student will be presented and the student
shall have the right to call their own witnesses and to examine all witnesses.
7. It shall be the duty of the Secretary of the Board to assist the student in preparing
for the hearing by making available to the student any public announcements or
reports of the Board or faculty relating to past disciplinary cases. The Secretary shall
also assist the student in obtaining witnesses. This assistance may include a letter to
the witness requesting their cooperation with the Administrative Board or such
other efforts to secure the participation as may be appropriate to the circumstances.
8. The Administrative Board may consider any evidence that it deems to be relevant
and trustworthy, and may exclude any evidence that it deems to be otherwise.
Formal rules of evidence do not apply.
9. The Board does not recognize a privilege of noncooperation and may, therefore,
draw such reasonable inferences from noncooperation as it deems appropriate.
Statements made to members of the Board and others are admissible at the hearing
regardless of when made.
10. Information obtained in confidence by the Health Service, whether medical or
psychiatric, shall not be sought by the Administrative Board nor disclosed to the
Board without the student’s consent. No weight is to be given to a student’s refusal
to consult the Health Service or to the student’s refusal to authorize disclosure of
information obtained by the Health Service. The absence of such information may,
however, properly preclude the Board from considering a medical excuse,
explanation, or justification in a particular case.
11. Disciplinary sanctions shall not be imposed unless conduct warranting sanction is
established by clear and convincing evidence. Decisions of the Administrative Board
shall be by majority vote of the sitting members. In case of a tie vote of all the
members of the Board present and voting, the vote of the majority of faculty
members and administrative officers shall determine the outcome.
12. All decisions of the Board to impose sanctions shall be supported by specific
findings of fact and conclusions, including, wherever appropriate, a statement or the
reasons for the specific sanction imposed and the principles or policies on which the
Board relies.
13. In all cases in which the sanction voted by the Board is other than dismission or
expulsion, the decision of the Board shall normally be final. If any such matter is
presented to the faculty for consideration, the faculty shall first vote on whether the
Board’s decision raises such important and novel issues of policy or is made under
such other extraordinary circumstances that the faculty must consider the matter.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 102 of 135
14. In all cases in which the sanction voted by the Administrative Board is dismission or
expulsion, the student shall be afforded the right to a supplementary hearing on the
facts before a hearing officer appointed from the faculty by the Dean. The student
shall submit to the hearing officer in writing a statement indicating which of the
factual findings of the Board the student disputes, and why. At the hearing, the
student may call and examine witnesses and be represented in the same manner as
before the Board. The position of the Administrative Board shall be presented to the
hearing officer by the Chairperson of the Administrative Board or a person chosen
by the Chairperson in consultation with the Dean. The hearing officer shall make a
written statement of findings of fact which shall be returned to the Administrative
Board. The Board may modify its findings of fact in light of the findings of the
hearing officer, and may modify the sanction previously voted.
15. In all cases in which the sanction voted by the Administrative Board is dismission or
expulsion, the faculty shall review the findings and conclusions of the Board. No
student shall be expelled or dismissed except by the vote of at least two-thirds of the
members of the faculty present and voting at the faculty meeting at which the
recommendation of the Administrative Board is considered.
16. Where the faculty reviews action of the Administrative Board it may substitute its
judgment for the Board’s on matters of policy including the severity and nature of
the sanction imposed. The sanction may be increased in severity as well as
decreased. The Board’s findings of fact shall not be modified unless, on the basis of
the whole record, including the findings, if any, of the hearing officer, the Board’s
findings are not supported by substantial evidence.
17. Should situations arise that are not covered by these rules or in which the
application of these rules is in the judgment of the Administrative Board,
inappropriate, the Administrative Board may formulate and follow an appropriate
ad hoc procedure. In any event, departures from the rules of procedure shall not,
ipso facto, constitute a defense to the imposition of a disciplinary sanction.
18. Copies of these procedures shall be published and made generally available. The
procedures shall also be given to any student involved in an Administrative Board
matter as soon as it appears that the matter may be treated as disciplinary.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 103 of 135
(The Administrative Board has adopted the following supplementary provisions for
disciplinary proceedings.)
1. The Board ordinarily discloses evidence in its possession that will be presented for
or against a student a reasonable time before the hearing. If the complainant is a
student, the complainant or their counsel is ordinarily expected to disclose evidence
to be presented against the subject of the proceeding a reasonable time before the
hearing. The subject of the proceeding or their counsel ordinarily is expected to
disclose evidence to be presented in his or behalf to the Board and, if the
complainant is a student, to the complainant, a reasonable time before the
proceeding. In exceptional circumstances, the Chairperson of the Board may qualify
the obligation of disclosure, in which case the evidence not disclosed is summarized
or described so far as practicable without compromising the justification for
nondisclosure.
2. At the outset of a hearing, the Chairperson states the charge against the student,
who is then given an opportunity personally to make a statement to the Board. After
the student has completed their statement, members of the Board may question the
student. When the Board has no further questions, counsel for the student may ask
questions for the purpose of expanding or clarifying answers previously given, but
not simply to repeat or restate answers previously given. If the complainant is a
student, when counsel for the subject of the proceeding has no further questions,
counsel for the complainant may ask questions for the purpose of qualifying or
clarifying answers previously given, but not simply to repeat questions previously
asked. Members of the Board may interrupt questioning by counsel at any time to
ask additional questions.
3. After the questioning of the student is completed, other witnesses are asked to give
evidence in an order to be determined by the Board.
4. The Board does not ordinarily entertain objections to a question on grounds of
irrelevance or immateriality. The Board may ask a witness or counsel to restrict
testimony to matters that it deems relevant and material. The Board may entertain
objections to a question or line of testimony on the grounds that it is offensive, may
unreasonably invade the privacy of the person questioned, or may unreasonably
embarrass or shame the person questioned or another person.
5. In compelling circumstances, the Board may require the student or, if the
complainant is a student, the complainant to listen to and watch the testimony of
another student by video conference. The person so required will be given an
opportunity to consult with their counsel before counsel questions the witness.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 104 of 135
6. After all evidence has been received, the complainant, if s/he is a student, and the
subject of the proceeding may make a closing statement of not more than ten
minutes, the complainant speaking first. After the complainant and the subject of the
proceeding have spoken, counsel for the complainant and the subject of the
proceeding may make closing statements of not more than ten minutes, counsel for
the complainant speaking first.
7. The Board may modify the preceding provisions as circumstances require.
XII. Other Rules and Important
Information
A. Notice of Non-Discrimination and Harvard Non-
Discrimination and Anti-Bullying Policies
Harvard University and Harvard Law School do not discriminate against any person on the
basis of age, race, color, national origin, sex (including gender identity and gender
expression, as well as pregnancy), genetic information, ancestry, religion, caste, creed,
veteran status, disability, military service, sexual orientation or political beliefs in
admission to, access to, treatment in, or employment in its programs and activities. All
employers using the facilities and services of the career services offices must comply with
these policies and procedures.
The University has adopted new policies and procedures to address discrimination and
bullying. These policies apply to all students, faculty, staff, researchers and other members
of the Harvard community across all Schools and units, including HLS. The University’s
non-discrimination and anti-bullying policies can be found
here: https://provost.harvard.edu/files/provost/files/non-discrimination_and_anti-
bullying_policies.pdf.
Whenever a formal complaint of discrimination or bullying is investigated in accordance
with the University’s non-discrimination and anti-bullying policies and procedures, and
those procedures result in a finding that a policy violation has occurred, then sanctions or
remedial measures will be determined by HLS’ Appropriate Official or designee(s), as set
forth in those procedures. The HLS Appropriate Official or designee(s) must accept the
finding of a policy violation as final and non-reviewable. The only opportunity to appeal the
determination of a policy violation is provided within the University’s non-discrimination
and anti-bullying policies and procedures. Decisions about sanctions and remedial
measures are final and cannot be appealed.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 105 of 135
The following individuals serve as resources for receiving reports and complaints, directing
community members to resources, and providing information on supportive measures:
Sasha Tulgan, Assistant Dean for Equal Opportunity
Catherine Claypoole, Dean for Academic and Faculty Affairs
At HLS, the following individuals have been designated as Appropriate Officials, who serve
as the final authority to issue any sanctions under the University’s non-discrimination and
anti-bullying policies:
For situations involving students, the Appropriate Official is the HLS faculty
members serving on the Law School’s Administrative Board or their designee.
For situations involving faculty, the Appropriate Official is a Law School Deputy
Dean or their designee.
For situations involving staff members, the Appropriate Official is the Dean for
Administration or their designee.
B. Title IX Policies and Information
The Law School is committed to maintaining a safe and healthy educational and work
environment in which no member of the University community is, on the basis of sex
(including gender identity and gender expression, as well as pregnancy), or sexual
orientation, excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or subjected to
discrimination in any University program or activity. Students are expected to review the
Harvard University Interim Policies on Title IX Sexual Harassment and Other Sexual
Misconduct and Procedures and the Law School’s related procedures available on the Title
IX Information page. More information and links to resources and training are available at
the Harvard Office for Gender Equity webpage. The Law School’s Title IX Program Officer
can answer questions and provide additional information and guidance about options and
resources.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 106 of 135
C. Harvard Law School FERPA Policy
1. Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (“FERPA”)
The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, as amended (“FERPA”) is a federal
law that gives students certain rights with respect to their education records.
2. Education Records
Harvard Law School (Harvard Law School) routinely maintains records for its students that
describe and document their work and progress. These education records generally
include records such as permanent and local addresses, admissions records, enrollment
status, course grades, reports and evaluations, completion of requirements and progress
toward the degree, records of disciplinary actions, and letters of recommendation.
3. Access
To be useful, students’ records must be accurate and complete. The officials who maintain
them are those in charge of the functions reflected in the records and the offices where the
records are kept. These ordinarily include the Registrar of Harvard Law School, as well as
other institutional officials. All students have access to their own education records and
may contribute to them if they feel there is need for clarification.
Students wishing access to their education records should contact the Harvard Law School
Registrar’s Office, WCC Suite 4007. Ordinarily, students are asked to submit a written
request that identifies the specific record or records they wish to inspect. Access will be
given within 45 days from the receipt of the request. When a record contains information
about more than one student, the student requesting access may inspect and review only
the portion of the record relating to themselves. Students also are not permitted to view
letters and statements of recommendation to which they waived their right of access, or
that were placed in their file before January 1, 1975.
Students should direct any questions they have about the accuracy of records to the person
in charge of the office where the records are kept. If questions still remain, the matter may
be referred to the Registrar in the Harvard Law School Registrar’s Office. Should it be
necessary, a hearing may be held to resolve challenges concerning the accuracy of records
in those cases where informal discussions have not satisfactorily settled the questions
raised.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 107 of 135
4. Directory Information
Harvard Law School regards the following information as “directory information,” that is,
information that, under FERPA, can be made available to the general public: full name,
reported date of birth, dates of attendance, concentration, class year, digitized image
(please note that while Harvard classifies photos and images as directory information,
these are rarely released to parties outside the University without the student’s
permission), local or campus residence address and telephone number, university email
address, prior degree information, home town or city at the time the application for
admission was filed by the student, original class at time of matriculation, degree candidate
status, date of graduation (actual or expected), degree(s) received with field of
concentration and level of honors granted (if any), prizes, fellowships, and similar honors
awarded, and, in certain cases, students’ and parents’ or guardians’ home addresses and
telephone numbers. Please note that Harvard University’s definition of “directory
information,” may include elements in addition to those used by Harvard Law School, and
that requests for directory information received at the University level thus may result in
disclosure of such additional elements.
Students may direct Harvard Law School not to disclose their directory information,
usually known as putting in place a “FERPA Block.” To do so, a student must inform the
Harvard Law School Registrar’s Office in writing, of that decision. Students should be aware
of the possible consequences of putting in place a FERPA Block, such as missed mailings,
messages, and announcements, non-verification of enrollment or degree status, and non-
inclusion in the Harvard Commencement booklet. Students who have previously chosen to
put in place a FERPA Block may decide to reverse this decision, also by informing Harvard
Law School Registrar’s Office in writing.
5. Other Disclosures Permitted under FERPA
In addition to permitting the disclosure of directory information, as set forth above, FERPA
permits disclosure of educational records without a student’s knowledge or consent under
certain circumstances. For example, disclosure is permitted to Harvard officials with a
legitimate educational interest in the records, meaning that the person needs the
information in order to fulfill their professional responsibilities, including instructional,
supervisory, advisory, administrative, academic or research, staff support or other duties.
“Harvard officials” include: faculty; administrators; clerical employees; professional
employees; Harvard University Health Services staff members; Harvard University Police
Department officers; agents of the University, such as independent contractors performing
functions on behalf of Harvard Law School or the University; members of Harvard’s
governing boards; and students serving on an official Harvard Law School or University
committee, or assisting another Harvard official in performing their tasks.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 108 of 135
A student’s education record also may be shared with parties outside the University under
certain conditions, including, for example, in situations involving a health and safety
emergency. In addition, Harvard Law School will forward a student’s education records to
other agencies or institutions that have requested the records and in which the student
seeks or intends to enroll or is already enrolled so long as the disclosure is for purposes
related to the student's enrollment or transfer.
If the Harvard Law School finds that a student has committed a disciplinary violation
involving a crime of violence or a non-forcible sex offense, then it also may, if legally
permitted and in Harvard Law School’s judgment appropriate, disclose certain information
about the disciplinary case. The disclosure may include the student’s name, the violation
committed, and the sanction imposed.
6. Student Rights under FERPA
As set forth above, under both Harvard policy and FERPA, students and former students
may inspect and review certain of their education records that are maintained by Harvard.
They also have the right to: exercise limited control over other people’s access to their
education records; seek to correct their education records if they believe them to be
inaccurate, misleading or otherwise in violation of their FERPA rights; file a complaint with
the U.S. Department of Education if they believe Harvard has not complied with the
requirements of FERPA; and be fully informed of their rights under FERPA. Complaints
regarding alleged violation of rights of students under FERPA may be submitted in writing
within 180 days to the Family Policy Compliance Office, US Department of Education, 400
Maryland Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20202-5920.
D. Protest and Dissent Guidelines
The following rules supplement applicable University policies that may affect protest and
dissent, including but not limited to the University-Wide Statement on Rights and
Responsibilities.
The right to dissent is the complement of the right to speak, but these rights need not
occupy the same forum at the same time. The speaker is entitled to communicate their
message to the audience during their allotted time, and the audience is entitled to hear the
message and see the speaker during that time. A dissenter must not substantially interfere
with a speaker’s ability to communicate or an audience’s ability to see and hear the
speaker.
1
1
A substantial interference is any interference that is nontrivial in either duration or extent. An interference
can be substantial, even if minimal in duration, if the interference is sufficiently disruptive or would be
expected to disrupt.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 109 of 135
When a meeting is closed, dissent by non-attendees is limited to activity outside the
meeting that does not impede access to the meeting or substantially interfere with the
communication inside.
2
When a meeting is open, the acceptable form of dissent will depend on whether the
dissenter is inside or outside the meeting and on whether the dissenter is acting before,
after or during the meeting:
1. Picketing and Distributing Literature
Picketing in an orderly way or distributing literature outside the meeting is acceptable
unless it impedes access to the meeting. Distributing literature inside an open meeting is
acceptable before the meeting is called to order and after the meeting is adjourned.
2. Silent or Symbolic Protest
a) Displaying a sign, wearing significant/symbolic clothing, gesturing, standing, or
otherwise protesting noiselessly is acceptable unless the protest interferes with the
audience’s view or prevents the audience from paying attention to the speaker.
b) Any use of signs, prolonged standing or other activity likely to block the view of
anyone in the audience should be confined to the back of the room.
3. Noise
Responding vocally to the speaker, spontaneously and temporarily, is generally acceptable,
especially if reaction against the speaker is similar in kind and degree to reaction in their
favor. Chanting or making other sustained or repeated noise in a manner which
substantially interferes with the speaker’s communication is not permitted, whether inside
or outside the meeting.
2
“Closed” meetings include events requiring an invitation or registration, as well as events not advertised on
the Law School’s public calendar. For closed meetings, the sharing, swapping, stealing, or other misuse of
registration information, Zoom details, name tags, and the like is a violation of these guidelines.
Please note, moreover, that the rule against non-attendees protesting inside a closed meeting supplements
the general rule that “[a] dissenter must not substantially interfere with a speaker’s ability to communicate or
an audience’s ability to see and hear the speaker.” The acceptable form of dissent for invited and registered
attendees inside a closed meeting is the same as for dissenters in an open meeting.
Finally, with respect to classrooms, any form of protest that disrupts the conduct of an HLS class would
violate the University-Wide Statement of Rights and Responsibilities’ prohibition against interference with
“the performance of the [] normal duties and activities” of the University. This includes occupying or
protesting near classroom ingresses and egresses, including hallways, of Law School academic buildings
while classes may be in session.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 110 of 135
4. Force or Violence
Using or threatening force or violence, such as defacing a sign or assaulting a speaker or a
member of the audience, is never permitted. Any interference with freedom of movement
or with freedom from personal force or violence is a serious violation of personal rights.
5. Audience Responsibility
The audience, like the host and the speaker, must respect the right to dissent. A member of
the audience or the host organization who substantially interferes with acceptable dissent
is violating these guidelines in the same way as a dissenter who violates the rights of the
speaker or audience.
6. Moderator/Facilitator
Senior HLS officials may determine that the protection of free speech at an open meeting
requires the use of a moderator or facilitator. If so, the meeting must be held with a
moderator/facilitator in attendance who will be selected by the sponsoring organization(s)
at the time the event is scheduled, and who is subject to approval by the Office of
Community Engagement, Equity, and Belonging.
3
The person selected must be perceived as
neutral and non-partisan. They will generally be a member of the HLS or University faculty
or administration. At the meeting, the moderator/facilitator must stress that their presence
reflects no position for or against the views of the speaker or sponsoring organization.
Final decisions regarding balancing the rights of the speaker with the rights of those who
disagree will be made by the moderator/facilitator. This person will have final authority
over all decisions, including, but not limited to:
a) whether to eject a disrupter from the room;
b) whether to move an event because of disruption or for security reasons;
c) whether to declare an event closed; and
d) whether to cancel an event because of security concerns.
3
For events organized by administrative departments or research programs at the Law School, the
moderator or facilitator need not be approved by the Office of Community Engagement, Equity and Belonging.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 111 of 135
E. Student Complaints Implicating Compliance with ABA
Standards for Legal Education
Harvard Law School invites students to share concerns about the Law School's program of
legal education, particularly any issues that directly implicate the School's compliance with
the ABA's Standards for Legal Education. Students having such a concern should submit
the concern, in writing, to the Dean of Students, who shall work with the appropriate
administrators to address the issue. The Dean of Students shall keep a record of all
submissions and their resolutions.
F. Class Recordings
Harvard Law School records classes upon request for various reasons. Classes may be
recorded with or without further notice. Students may not record, stream, reproduce,
publish, or further distribute outside the course any course content, including assessments,
problems, answers, video clips, screenshots, and slides presented during class. Please
consult the separate Class Recording Information page, for timing and process for requests.
Students interested in applying for class recordings as an accommodation should contact
Harvard Law School’s Accessibility Services team.
1. Reasons for Student Class Recording Requests
Students may request recordings of class lectures for the following reasons:
a) Religious Holidays: Classes taking place on religious holidays are not automatically
recorded. Faculty and/or students may request that a class be audio-recorded on a
religious holiday. The Law School will not record for travel days surrounding
religious holidays. If the religion’s holiday begins at sundown, HLS will record
classes upon request on the day the holiday begins and ending at noon the day after
the holiday ends.
b) Make-up classes: The Law School’s make-up class period is 3:45-5:45 p.m. on Friday
afternoons, which students are expected to keep available. All faculty members are
encouraged to use this period for make-up classes. Make-up classes scheduled
during this time will only be recorded if a student has a scheduling conflict with
another make-up class. Make-up classes at times outside this class period may be
recorded at the instructor’s or a student’s request.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 112 of 135
c) Birth of a child (for both parents); death of an immediate family member or other
person with whom the student has a similarly close relationship; or significant
personal or medical emergency: Students may request that a class be audio-recorded
due to the foregoing reasons for a period of two weeks or fewer in duration.
Recording for these reasons will be considered only in cases in which classes will be
missed for a period of two weeks or fewer. In most cases, a student’s absence from
their classes for more than two weeks will be cause for a leave of absence (see
Section I(O) and Section II(A)(3)).
d) Military service: Students may request that a class be audio-recorded to fulfill an
unavoidable military service or training obligation lasting for a period of two weeks
or fewer in duration.
Recording for these reasons will be considered only in cases in which classes will be
missed for a period of two weeks or fewer. In most cases, a student’s absence from
their classes for more than two weeks will be cause for a leave of absence (see
Section I(O) and Section II(A)(3)).
e) Professional Examinations: Students may request that a class be audio-recorded due
to an unavoidable conflict with a Professional Examination (such as the Bar Exam,
or the Multi-State Professional Responsibility Exam MPRE).
f) Extraordinary Educational Opportunities: Students may request that a class be
audio-recorded due to the foregoing reason, such as participating in an international
moot course competition, for a period of four days or fewer in duration.
g) Clinical Hearings: Students may request that a class be audio-recorded for the
following reasons: unavoidable conflicts with court hearings, administrative
proceedings, or other court-ordered appearances connected to the Clinical
Programs, where the student is a primary actor in the proceeding. The student must
exhaust all means of avoiding the conflict by attempting to reschedule the
appearance or attempting to arrange coverage of the hearing by another qualified
student or attorney. Additionally, a student may request a recording where a make-
up class is scheduled during ordinarily scheduled clinical hours required for
academic credit. These scheduled hours with the clinical placement must be
confirmed by a clinic director or from filings with the Office of Clinical and Pro Bono
offices for externship placements.
h) Elections: The Registrar’s Office may initiate audio-recording of all classes due to the
foregoing reason only when it is a state or federal general election day in the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 113 of 135
2. Automated Recordings
Start and stop times for HLS class recordings are automated according to the class meeting
times and, due to system constraints, cannot be altered. Therefore, if a class extends
beyond the scheduled start and end times, the resulting recording will not include any
instruction or discussion that took place prior to the scheduled start time or in the time
following the scheduled end time. In addition, Information Technology Services does not
edit the start and end of class recordings so conversation occurring before and/or after the
formal instructional time will be viewable.
3. Publication of Recordings
a) Class recordings may in some cases be made available to the entire class via the
Canvas course site. Please note that faculty members and administrators of the sites
reserve the right to remove any links from course websites at any time.
b) No person is permitted to post, distribute, or otherwise make available any class- or
clinic-related recordings produced by the Harvard Law School without written
permission of the Dean for Academic and Faculty Affairs.
c) All postings will be removed from streaming access (Harvard Law School server)
after three academic years from the academic year of creation. The Information
Technology Services Department must be notified at the time a request is submitted
if there is any reason that digital audio and video streaming media will require
linking for longer than three years. Instances requiring media storage longer than
the default lifespan will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and may incur
additional hosting costs to the requesting department or organization.
d) The Information Technology Services Department is not responsible for hardship
encountered with expired audio and video links if lifespan beyond the ordinary
three years was not requested at the time of the recording request.
e) Although Harvard Law School makes every effort to ensure the security of
recordings, any recording made by Information Technology Services could
potentially be downloaded, copied, manipulated and/or redistributed.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 114 of 135
G. Student International Travel
1) Any student traveling internationally under Harvard auspices must prior to departure:
a) Register the trip in the University’s International SOS MyTrips platform. Registering
is required for all students traveling under Harvard auspices (that is, trips funded or
arranged by the Law School or other parts of the University or resulting in academic
credit) and strongly recommended for everyone. Registering enables the University
to locate people quickly and provide assistance in the event of an emergency.
Students must create a profile in MyTrips initially using their Harvard email
address; students can then add an additional preferred email address to their
profile. After creating their MyTrips profile, students can enter their trip details
manually or forward their confirmed bookings to
[email protected]. Entries should include the complete
period of time abroad, including travel before, during, and after the primary
program / project under Harvard auspices, and students should make sure the
information stays up-to-date throughout travel.
b) Review, sign and return the appropriate Assumption of Risk form to the sponsoring
program at the Law School.
c) Examine Harvard’s Global Support Services’ travel risk ratings and seek necessary
reviews as specified below. Students who are considering travel to an area that is
categorized as high-risk, and that would occur during the period of the program /
project under Harvard auspices, must both:
i) Complete and submit the Questionnaire for Graduate Student Travel at
least 30 days in advance of the expected travel date. (Access to the
document requires a HarvardKey log-in.) In the event that circumstances
beyond a student’s control do not allow for at least 30 days’ advance notice,
the student should contact International Legal Studies and provide a
detailed explanation. If circumstances warrant, ILS will request an
expedited review.
ii) Consult with a member of the Global Support Services safety and security
team if requested to do so by GSS or Harvard Law School’s International
Legal Studies.
This is necessary in order to obtain clearance for travel in conjunction with courses
or clinics as well as independent travel and applies for the duration of the placement
or project abroad. Please be aware that HLS may advise against and may even
withhold support for travel that is deemed to pose excessive risk.
HLS students should also review Harvard’s Graduate and Professional Student
International Travel Policy.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 115 of 135
2) Students traveling over the winter term or summer, for HLS academic credit and/or
with Harvard funding must attend an international travel information session and
complete the Global Support Services online orientation as specified on the HLS
international travel procedures webpage.
Students must complete all of these requirements, and any others stipulated on the
School’s international travel procedures webpage or by the student’s HLS sponsoring
program, in advance of travel abroad in order to maintain eligibility for HLS funding and
academic credit. The international travel webpage will contain the most current
information and it is critical that students review it carefully.
HLS students traveling abroad for academic or professional reasons are covered by
Harvard University’s International SOS membership. International SOS provides 24-hour
worldwide emergency medical and security assistance and evacuation services. Please note
that this program is a supplement to, not a substitute for, health insurance.
Students should be sure to review the Health and Safety and Planning and
Precautions pages for the information they will need before and during travels. The
Passports and Visas page also contains helpful information. Students with questions about
international travel should contact the Director of International Legal Studies.
H. Student Employment
The faculty recommends that first-year students not commit themselves to employment
during the academic year until they know what demands Law School will make on their
time and energy. Students are advised to work no more than ten to 15 hours per week
during the school year; pursuant to Harvard Law School Policy, no student may be
employed for more than 20 hours of work per week during the academic year while classes
are in session (see Section I(A)(4)).
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 116 of 135
I. Use of University Libraries
The University’s libraries are for the use of students, faculty, staff, and other authorized
members of the University and scholarly community. Except when specifically authorized,
the systematic exploitation of library resources, including its databases, is prohibited. It is
inappropriate for students and others to sell data, or to act as agents for those who do, or
otherwise to use their library privileges other than for personal academic use. This
includes use of many library resources during the course of some internships and some
types of employment. Use of some library resources are subject to individual user
agreements from the database provider. Violations of those individual user agreements
may result in suspension of access to those resources. Library staff are authorized to take
appropriate action to ensure the safety and security of spaces, resources, and patrons.
Students with questions about the use of specific digital resources should contact the
library.
Library users must:
Safeguard the integrity of library resources.
Respect the restrictions placed on access to and the use of those resources.
Respect the rights of others to the quiet use of the library.
J. Information Technology Services
1. Harvard Law School Computer and Network Resources Usage Agreement
In support of Harvard Law School’s learning, teaching, and research goals, Information
Technology Services (ITS) provides current members of the Law School community with
access to the school’s computer and network resources. To ensure that these resources
remain available to all members of the community and to protect the substantial
investment Harvard Law School has made in its computer and network systems, student
access is conditioned upon agreement to and compliance with the terms of this Harvard
Law School Computer and Network Resources Usage Agreement. Harvard Law School
Computer and Network Resources include but are not limited to: Harvard Law School
campus and office space; wired, wireless, and VPN network equipment; back-office systems
(e.g. email, Student Information System); printers, desktop and laptop equipment provided
to students, faculty, or staff and any other computing equipment owned and/or operated
by the Law School’s ITS department.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 117 of 135
2. Use of Computer and Network Resources
No one may use a computer and/or the network in a way that would damage or
inappropriately degrade these resources, or disrupt the work of others. Students are
prohibited from attempting to:
a) Interfere with the work of others
b) Gain unauthorized access to computer or network resources
c) Circumvent or violate local network, electronic accounts, or Web security systems
d) Use other people’s Harvard Law School electronic accounts
e) Damage or inappropriately degrade performance of computer and network
resources
f) Willfully misrepresent the identifying attributes of any electronic communications
(e.g., date and time of creation or transmission, message identification number, IP
address, etc.)
g) Unlawfully use, duplicate, or distribute software and files
h) Use computer or network resources for commercial purposes without authorization
i) Use computer or network resources in violation of any applicable law or Harvard
Law School policy
In addition to possible disciplinary action and/or termination of network privileges, the
violation of any of these restrictions may result in legal penalties.
Students are responsible for the use of their electronic accounts (e.g., email, network,
course websites, and printing) and are not permitted to grant others access to these
accounts. Nor should a student disclose their password to anyone, including friends or
family. ITS staff will not ask students for their passwords when ITS assistance is requested.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 118 of 135
3. Compliance with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998
The University prohibits the use of the Harvard network for illegal activities. Federal law
prohibits the reproduction, distribution, public display or public performance of
copyrighted materials over the Internet without permission of the copyright holder, except
in accordance with fair use or other specifically applicable statutory exceptions. Harvard
may terminate the network access of users who are found to have repeatedly infringed the
copyrights of others. In addition, unauthorized distribution of copyrighted material,
including unauthorized peer-to-peer file sharing, may subject a student to civil and
criminal liabilities. Harvard complies fully with the federal Digital Millennium Copyright
Act of 1998 ("DMCA") and has in place the mandated process for receiving and tracking
alleged incidents of copyright infringement.
Harvard network users should be aware of recent changes in the pre-subpoena notification
approach employed by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA). These
changes include notices requesting the preservation of records in advance of a subpoena,
and notices providing an option for users to settle in advance of potential lawsuits.
University policy remains unchanged. We will continue to comply with the Digital
Millennium Copyright Act and federal law pertaining to DMCA subpoenas, and will
continue to update the community of significant changes to process or law.
The University is committed to maintaining the integrity and availability of the Harvard
network for vital educational and research purposes for which it was designed. We
recommend that all students become familiar with the laws pertaining to the use of digital
material and to comply with federal law and University policy regarding use of copyrighted
materials. More information may be found at https://dmca.harvard.edu/copyright-policy
and http://dmca.harvard.edu/faq.
BitTorrent, Torrent, Ares, and other file-sharing programs can transmit files on a student's
computer to others in violation of copyright laws, with or without the student's knowledge.
If these programs are on a student's computer, the student will be held responsible for any
copyright violations that may result.
4. Policy on Access to Electronic Information
Harvard University’s Policy on Access to Electronic Information sets out guidelines and
processes for University access to user electronic information stored in or transmitted
through any University system.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 119 of 135
5. Security and Privacy
Electronic communications, communicative attributes of electronic communications (e.g.,
date and time of transmission, subject, identification number, parties with whom a student
communicates, how often, etc.), and files stored on Harvard Law School servers will be kept
confidential in accordance with privacy policies set by Harvard Law School, Harvard
University, and by law.
Students should understand that no network is perfectly secure, and that there are
substantial risks that communications can be intercepted, or that any message intended for
one person can be easily forwarded to another by the recipient. Students should take care
that particularly sensitive documents not remain on computer or network systems that are
publicly accessible or that others may easily access. Likewise, students are responsible
prior to forwarding a message to ensure that doing so is consistent with the originator’s
reasonable expectations.
Network-based system activity, such as network connection and email message
transmission, is automatically logged on a continuous basis. These logs include a record of
user processes, message subjects, and other user-related data that may be examined by ITS
system administrators to maintain system performance and/or prevent damage or
degradation, or to ensure compliance with Harvard Law School guidelines. ITS also
maintains regular backups of network servers, including email messages and files. The
purpose of these backups is to restore the system in case of data loss due to a system crash.
These backups are subject to the same privacy protections as any network data, but also,
obviously, present additional risk.
System administrators, following University guidelines, will produce any available log
records, messages, and files at the request of the Dean for Administration, Dean of
Students, or the Administrative Board.
When a student requests assistance from ITS, the student implicitly gives the staff
permission to view the data in the student’s account or on the student’s computer to the
extent necessary to investigate, diagnose, or correct the problem the student is having, and
ITS staff will make reasonable efforts to alert the student to the anticipated and actual
scope of any such viewing.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 120 of 135
6. Anonymous and Pseudonymous Communications
Three general rules govern all electronic communications:
1) Electronic communication systems, whether email or discussion groups, produce
records that facilitate the ability to trace such communications. These records may
not in all cases reveal the identity of the sender, but they do facilitate the
identification of a particular communication’s origin. A student is prohibited from
modifying this data in a manner that will interfere with the ability to trace a
communication.
2) Members of the Harvard Law School community are given accounts based on their
legal name; a student may not take steps to hide their identity in electronic
communication when using Harvard Law School accounts, computers, networks, or
servers.
3) In no context may a student fraudulently misrepresent their identity.
Whether electronic communications may be anonymous or pseudonymous is determined
by the particular context within which the communication occurs, and inappropriate use of
electronic communications may result in disciplinary action.
7. Misuse of Resources
Because the electronic communications originating from the Harvard Law School
community automatically carry the Harvard Law School domain name (“law.harvard.edu”
and “hls.harvard.edu”), a student should be particularly careful not to inaccurately identify
themselves as representing or speaking for the institution. More generally, in the use of
email or other electronic communication, the same standards of conduct governing the use
of telephones and oral and written communication apply. A student may not use email to
broadcast messages or “spam” the Harvard Law School community.
As with any Harvard Law School resource, “misuse” includes the theft or deliberate damage
of any Harvard Law School equipment or resource. With regard to Harvard Law School
computer and network resources, it also includes other activities that interfere with the
efficient and reliable provisioning of computer and network services. Such other activities
include, but are not limited to, the following specific prohibitions:
1) A student may not relocate or disassemble any Harvard Law School network,
computer, or peripheral equipment.
2) A student may not attempt to intercept, analyze, record, or tamper with network
data packets.
3) A student may not connect non-ITS network equipment to the Harvard Law School
network. This includes, but is not limited to, routers and wireless access points.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 121 of 135
8. Emergency Situations and Compliance with Account Quotas
In any situation that threatens system security, stability, integrity, or performance, ITS
system administrators will take necessary action to defend computer and network
resources. These defense measures may include terminating or suspending processes or
user accounts without prior notice. ITS will notify the affected user(s) as soon as feasible.
Emergency situations may or may not involve deliberate misconduct.
All users are expected to adhere to the specific usage quotas that govern Harvard Law
School accounts. Repeated failure to act upon ITS requests regarding such quotas may
result in files or messages being deleted from over-quota accounts.
9. Copyright and Software Licenses
All Harvard users must respect the copyrights in works that are accessible through
computers connected to the Harvard network. Federal copyright law prohibits the
reproduction, distribution, public display, or public performance of copyrighted materials
without permission of the copyright owner, unless fair use or another exemption under
copyright law applies. In appropriate circumstances, Harvard will terminate the network
access of users who are found to have repeatedly and knowingly infringed the copyrights of
others, and may also take disciplinary action.
Users may not install software on Harvard-owned computers without express approval of
Harvard Law School Information Technology Services, as well as evidence of a valid
software license or other right or privilege to install such software.
10. Cases of Misconduct
Whenever a case of misconduct is suspected by or reported to ITS, ITS will immediately
notify the person or persons accused of such misconduct and the appropriate supervisory
authority, such as the Dean of Students or the Dean for Administration. As the situation
warrants, the supervisory authority will determine the course of any investigation or
disciplinary action. After such notification and while any inquiry is pending, ITS has the
right to deny access to Harvard Law School equipment and network services to any person
or persons believed to be violating the guidelines set forth here.
In addition to possible disciplinary action on the part of the Harvard Law School and/or
termination of network privileges, misuse of electronic communications, use of computers
for unlawful purposes, and violations of copyright laws carry civil and criminal penalties
under Massachusetts and federal law. All users are expected to learn and abide by these
laws. Harvard’s policy is to cooperate with law enforcement officials in the detection,
investigation, and prosecution of unlawful activity. Unless lawfully prohibited by the
authorities, a student will be notified if information specific to their account or
communications is turned over to non-Harvard authorities.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 122 of 135
11. Leaving Harvard Law School
Before a student leaves Harvard Law School, they should review the information regarding
access to HLS student service technology applications after graduation and be aware of
timelines for access.
K. Multimedia Studio
The Multimedia Studio at Harvard Law School (opened in the basement of WCC in fall
2021) is run by the Office of Learning Experience and Innovation (LXI), in close
collaboration with ITS and Communications, and is available for use by members of the
HLS community according to the guidelines and schedule set forth on the Office of Learning
Experience and Innovation (LXI) website.
L. Video Security Policies
The Law School has installed a video management infrastructure to enhance the safety and
security of the community, reduce institutional risk, and aid in the prevention and
investigation of crime or other misconduct at the School or against members of the HLS
community. The privacy of the community members is a fundamental principle in the
design and implementation of the video management system across campus, and access to
video camera data is managed in accordance with the University’s Policy on Installation
and Use of Video Cameras. Students are invited to review the Law School’s Video Security
Policies.
M. Harvard University I.D. Cards
Harvard University I.D. (HUID) cards are the property of Harvard University and are
intended for University purposes only. HUID cards are required for admission to most
Harvard activities and facilities including libraries, museums, dining halls, athletic
buildings, and student residences.
Every student is responsible for their HUID card and the consequences of its misuse. HUID
cards are not transferable; a student may not allow any other person to use their HUID card
for any purpose.
A student who alters or falsifies their HUID card or produces or distributes false
identification cards of any kind is subject to disciplinary action. Lost cards should be
reported immediately to Harvard University Identification and Data Services. Students
must hand over their HUID card or otherwise identify themselves upon request to any
properly identified officer of the University. Surrendered HUID cards will be transmitted
immediately to I.D. Card Services. More information about HUID cards for new Law School
students is available from the Office of the Registrar and at the Campus Service Center.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 123 of 135
N. Payment of Bills
Each student is personally responsible for payment of their student account. All students at
Harvard University are required to sign a Financial Responsibility Agreement (FRA). The
FRA provides important information about the financial policies associated with your
enrollment at Harvard. More information can be found
here: https://sfs.harvard.edu/financial-responsibility-agreement-fra.
For J.D. students, a monthly payment plan is available as an alternative to full payment on a
specified date, the terms of which are available by calling the Student Accounts Office at
617-495-2739 or at the Student Accounts website. The monthly payment plan is not
available to LL.M. or S.J.D. students.
Students who are not current in their student account payments will not be allowed to
register for courses in the spring or to enroll in the Law School at the start of the academic
year and may be placed on involuntary leave (see Section X(C)(5)). All services of the
Registrar will be withheld for students who have outstanding financial obligations to the
University.
Students who become delinquent in their student account payments after registration are
assessed a $250 late fee and will be reported to the Law School’s Administrative Board.
Absent a finding of extraordinary circumstances, such as a serious medical or personal
emergency or other special circumstances supported by appropriate administrative
officials, the Administrative Board, as a general matter, will cancel the registration of
delinquent students. A student whose registration has been canceled is not eligible to take
exams and will not earn credits for the term.
University policy dictates that degree candidates who have failed to pay all student account
charges by the date specially established for graduating students will not be voted a degree
by the governing boards of the University.
Students who leave the University for any reason must pay all charges immediately upon
notice from the University Student Accounts Office. A student who leaves the University
without paying outstanding charges is not eligible to be considered for readmission until all
financial obligations to the University have been fully satisfied. Any student who leaves the
University with an amount due on their student account that is unpaid for sixty days or
more may be subject to collection activities. The costs associated with collecting an unpaid
account will be added to the student’s outstanding account balance and must be paid in full.
Questions regarding payment of student account notices should be directed to Student
Financial Services in WCC 5027 for J.D. candidates and to the Graduate Program Financial
Aid Office in WCC 5005 for those in the LL.M. and S.J.D. programs.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 124 of 135
O. Harvard Law School Drug and Alcohol Policy
1. Policy
Harvard Law School's policy on drugs and alcohol-adapted from and in accordance with,
other similar policies at Harvard University-reflects our concern for the health and well-
being of our students, faculty, and staff. Harvard Law School promotes the health and well-
being of its students and employees through its Health Services and other agencies. The
unlawful possession, use, or distribution of illicit drugs and alcohol by students or
employees on Harvard property or as a part of any Harvard activities is a violation of
Harvard Law School rules, as well as the law. Possession, use, or distribution of certain
nonprescription drugs, including marijuana, amphetamines, heroin, cocaine, and
nonprescription synthetics; procurement or distribution of alcohol if one is under 21 years
of age; and provision of alcohol to anyone under 21 years of age are violations of law and of
Harvard Law School Policy. Although Massachusetts law now permits adults aged 21 or
older to possess and consume marijuana under certain circumstances, federal law
prohibits the possession, use, or distribution of marijuana, including for medical purposes,
on Harvard property or as part of a Harvard activity. Thus, even if possession or use of
marijuana would be permitted under Massachusetts law, it remains prohibited on campus.
The use of illicit drugs and the misuse of alcohol are potentially harmful to health. In
particular, synthetically produced drugs, which are readily available in the Boston
metropolitan area, often have unpredictable emotional and physical side effects, which
constitute an extreme health hazard. In addition, students are encouraged to weigh the
seriousness of potential loss of function that may come from ingesting illicit drugs or too
much alcohol. Because of the considerable health hazards involved in drug and alcohol use,
administrative, medical, and psychiatric help for students having drug problems or
difficulties controlling their use of alcohol are available on a confidential basis from the
Harvard Law School Health Services and at the University Health Services at the Smith
Campus Center, and any member of the University may make use of the Health Services on
an emergency basis, day or night.
Attention is directed to the fact that Harvard Law School is not, and cannot be considered
as, a protector or sanctuary from the existing laws of the city, state, or federal government.
Students are reminded that there are heavy penalties, including imprisonment, for
possession or distribution of illicit drugs and for selling or delivering alcohol to, or
procuring alcohol for, someone under the age of 21. There are also serious penalties for
anyone under the age of 21 who purchases, attempts to purchase, or arranges to procure
alcoholic beverages or to misrepresent their age or falsify their identification with the
intent of purchasing alcohol; anyone, regardless of age, caught falsifying a driver’s license,
or selling or distributing false I.D.s; and anyone, regardless of age, who operates a motor
vehicle under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or with an open container of alcohol. In
addition, the city of Cambridge prohibits consumption of alcohol on public property or on
property open to the public. All students should become familiar with the pamphlet on
drug and alcohol law prepared by the General Counsel to the University, distributed at
registration each year, and available in the Dean of Students Office.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 125 of 135
The Law School will take appropriate action when cases of this type come to its attention.
Incidents to which Harvard Law School may respond include:
The use of illicit drugs;
Underage possession or consumption of alcohol;
Serving alcohol to underage individuals;
Possession in quantity or the sale or distribution of drugs; or
Drug or alcohol use which risks danger to the Harvard community.
Sanctions may include a warning by administrative officers and referral to health or
counseling services or action by the Administrative Board, including warning, reprimand,
suspension, or expulsion (the last three sanctions are reported to bar authorities), and
referral for prosecution.
2. Provisions Regarding Alcohol Service and Use at Harvard Law School
The only alcoholic beverages that may be served to or consumed by HLS students or their
guests at Law School events and in the HLS Pub are beer and wine, whether the events are
University/HLS sponsored or private. All alcohol for Law School events must be purchased
through Harvard University Dining Services (HUDS). Personally purchased alcohol may be
consumed only in private living spaces. It may not be brought into, served, or consumed in
any public areas on campus, including residence hall common rooms, main lounges, and
other shared spaces. Harvard University Dining Services also purchases, serves, and sells
beer and wine for the HLS Pub, under a separate liquor license obtained by HUDS.
3. Drinking Age
The minimum drinking age in Massachusetts is 21. To be served or provided an alcoholic
beverage, an individual must show proof of minimum drinking age by presenting a
government-issued, photo identification.
4. Bartenders
Harvard University Dining Services (HUDS) holds and manages the main liquor license for
the Harvard Law School campus. Under the terms of this license, all alcoholic beverages for
all on-campus events must be provided by HUDS, and HUDS bartenders must be present to
serve the alcohol.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 126 of 135
5. Police Presence
A Harvard University Police (HUPD) detail (officer) must be present for student-sponsored
events whenever alcohol is served and the number in attendance exceeds 100, or for any
event where HUPD presence is determined to be necessary by the Office of Community
Engagement, Equity, and Belonging. A police detail can be arranged by visiting the HUPD
website. The appropriate number of police officers will be determined by the HUPD and the
Office of Community Engagement, Equity, and Belonging.
6. Food and Non-Alcoholic Beverages
A proportional amount of food and nonalcoholic beverages must be available at any event
where alcohol is served. Please contact Harvard University Dining Services (HUDS) or the
Office of Community Engagement, Equity, and Belonging to determine the appropriate
amount.
7. Off-campus Events Private Residence
Harvard Law School funds cannot be used to purchase or serve alcohol at a private
residence.
8. Off-campus Events Bars, Restaurants, and Off-Site Function Facilities
If a bar, restaurant, or function facility serves alcohol under its own license, the on-campus
guidelines relating to alcohol service and use do not apply (since liability is covered by the
establishment; nevertheless, the Harvard Law School Drug and Alcohol Policy applies to all
members of the Harvard Law School community). Students may receive a maximum of two
drink tickets each for such events, which can be used to purchase only beer, wine, or
nonalcoholic beverages. The Office of Community Engagement, Equity, and Belonging will
arrange payment for such drink tickets in advance of the event. A student point of contact
must be identified and must meet with the Office of Community Engagement, Equity, and
Belonging prior to such events; and that student must coordinate the distribution of the
appropriate amount of drink tickets with the manager on duty at the establishment.
9. Liquor Licenses
A special one-day liquor license must be obtained from the Cambridge License Commission
(at Cambridge City Hall) for all events where alcohol is sold, except as noted below only.
Procedures for obtaining the license are available from the Office of Event Scheduling &
Support. A special one-day liquor license is not necessary in some instances, because the
HUDS liquor license covers the sale of beer and wine. Student organizations must check
with the Office of Community Engagement, Equity, and Belonging before selling any
alcoholic beverages. Violations of the Harvard Law School Drug and Alcohol Policy will
be referred to the Administrative Board for possible disciplinary action. Please
contact the Dean of Students Office with questions regarding Alcohol Service and Use at
Harvard Law School, 617-495-1880 or [email protected].
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 127 of 135
P. Cambridge No Smoking Ordinance and Harvard No
Smoking Policy
1. City of Cambridge No Smoking Ordinance
Effective June 9, 2003, Cambridge Municipal Code Section 9.28.060 provides that, “smoking
is prohibited in all workplaces.” Also effective June 9, 2003, Section 9.28.090 of the Code
provides that, with some exceptions, “No person shall smoke nor shall any person be
permitted to smoke in any public place or municipal facility.” All members of the Law
School community are urged to exercise courtesy and thoughtfulness in implementing this
policy.
2. Harvard No Smoking Policy
On March 1, 2015, Harvard’s North Yard, which includes the Law School, became
completely tobacco free. This initiative stems from decades of research on the negative
impacts of smoking, second-hand smoke, and tobacco use, and is part of an ongoing effort
to enhance the health and wellness of all members of the Harvard community.
All forms of tobacco use including cigarettes, cigars, e-cigarettes, and smokeless tobacco
are prohibited inside all Harvard buildings, offices, in Harvard Yard, and outside all HLS
buildings.
Q. Harvard Law School Missing Persons Policy
As required under federal law, Harvard Law School will immediately refer to the Harvard
University Police Department (HUPD) any missing persons report involving a student who
lives in on-campus housing. If any member of the Harvard community has reason to
believe that a student who resides in on-campus housing is missing, they should
immediately notify HUPD at 617-495-1212.
If HUPD determines that the student has been missing for more than 24 hours, then, within
the 24 hours following this determination, the School or HUPD will:
1) notify an appropriate external law enforcement agency, unless the local law
enforcement agency was the entity that made the determination that the student is
missing;
2) contact anyone the student has identified as a missing person contact under the
procedures described below; and
3) notify others at the University, as appropriate, about the student’s disappearance.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 128 of 135
In addition to identifying a general emergency contact person, students residing in on-
campus housing have the option to identify confidentially a separate person to be
contacted by Harvard in the event that the student is determined to be missing for more
than 24 hours. Students are not required to designate a separate individual for this
purpose and if they choose not to do so then Harvard will assume that they have chosen to
treat their general emergency contact as their missing person contact. Students who wish
to identify a confidential missing person contact should notify the Registrar. A student’s
confidential missing person contact information will be accessible only by authorized
campus officials and by law enforcement in the course of an investigation. In addition, if it
has been determined that a student who is under 18 years of age and not emancipated has
been missing for more than 24 hours, then the Harvard Law School or HUPD will contact
that student’s custodial parent or guardian. Students are reminded that they must provide
the Registrar with emergency contact information and/or confidential missing person
contact information if they have not already done so.
R. Nonresident Student Driver Statements and Decals
State law requires Harvard to post the following notice to all students who are not
Massachusetts residents:
IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR A NONRESIDENT STUDENT TO FAIL TO FILE A
NONRESIDENT DRIVER STATEMENT WITH THE POLICE DEPARTMENT
LOCATED IN THE SAME CITY OR TOWN AS THE SCHOOL OR COLLEGE
ATTENDED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 3 OF CHAPTER 90 OF THE
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL LAWS. FAILURE TO FILE SUCH STATEMENT IS
PUNISHABLE BY A FINE NOT TO EXCEED $200.
Under Massachusetts law, if out-of-state students bring cars to campus but elect not to
register them with the Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles, then they must file a
nonresident driver statement with the local police department, whether or not they apply
for on-campus parking. Shortly after filing the nonresident driver statement with the
Cambridge Police Department, students will receive a nonresident student driver decal
from the University Parking Office. This decal must be prominently displayed in the
“uppermost center position” of the vehicle’s windshield.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 129 of 135
S. Voter Registration
Effective January 1, 1995, Massachusetts Law as set forth in Chapter 151C, Section 2B
(Section 17 of Chapter 471 of the Acts of 1993), requires educational institutions to make
available affidavits of voter registration forms at registration. Students will be able to
register to vote at registration and mail-in affidavits will be available in the Dean of
Student’s Office throughout the year.
For students from other states who desire to vote in a state other than Massachusetts, the
federal mail-in affidavit of voter registration or a mail-in form supplied by that state may be
used. The student must contact the appropriate state election official to receive the state
form or call or write the Massachusetts Elections Division, Room 1705, McCormack
Building, One Ashburton Place, Boston, MA 02108, for a Federal form.
T. Massachusetts Anti-Hazing Statute
269:17. Hazing; organizing or participating; hazing defined
[Text as amended by 1987, 665 effective April 4, 1988. For text effective until April 4,
1988, see 1986 Edition.]
Whoever is a principal organizer or participant in the crime of hazing, as defined herein,
shall be punished by a fine of not more than three thousand dollars or by imprisonment in
a house of correction for not more than one year, or both such fine and imprisonment.
The term “hazing” as used in this section and in sections eighteen and nineteen, shall mean
any conduct or method of initiation into any student organization, whether on public or
private property, which willfully or recklessly endangers the physical or mental health of
any student or other person. Such conduct shall include whipping, beating, branding, forced
calisthenics, exposure to the weather, forced consumption of any food, liquor, beverage,
drug, or other substance, or any other brutal treatment or forced physical activity which is
likely to adversely affect the physical health or safety of any such student or other person,
or which subjects such student or other person to extreme mental stress, including
extended deprivation of sleep or rest or extended isolation.
Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section to the contrary, consent shall not be
available as a defense to any prosecution under this action.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 130 of 135
269:18. Failure to report hazing
[Text as amended by 1987, 665 effective April 4, 1988. For text effective until April 4,
1988, see 1986 Edition.]
Whoever knows that another person is the victim of hazing as defined in Section 17 and is
at the scene of such crime shall, to the extent that such person can do so without danger or
peril to himself or others, report such crime to an appropriate law enforcement official as
soon as reasonably practicable. Whoever fails to report such crime shall be punished by a
fine of not more than one thousand dollars.
269:19. Copy of secs. 1719; issuance to students and student groups,
teams and organizations; report
[Text as amended by 1987, 665 effective April 4, 1988. For text effective until April 4,
1988, see 1986 Edition.]
Each institution of secondary education and each public and private institution of post-
secondary education shall issue to every student group, student team, or student
organization which is part of such institution, or is recognized by the institution, or
permitted by the institution to use its name or facilities, or is known by the institution to
exist as an unaffiliated student group, student team or student organization, a copy of this
section and sections seventeen and eighteen; provided, however, that an institution’s
compliance with this section’s requirements that an institution issue copies of this section
and sections seventeen and eighteen to unaffiliated student groups, teams, or organizations
shall not constitute evidence of the institution’s recognition or endorsement of said
unaffiliated student groups, teams, or organizations.
Each such group, team, or organization shall distribute a copy of this section and sections
seventeen and eighteen to each of its members, plebes, pledges, or applicants for
membership. It shall be the duty of each such group, team, or organization, acting through
its designated officer, to deliver annually, to the institution an attested acknowledgement
stating that such group, team, or organization has received a copy of this section and said
sections seventeen and eighteen, that each of its members, plebes, pledges, or applicants
has received a copy of sections seventeen and eighteen, and that such group, team or
organization understands and agrees to comply with the provisions of this section and
sections seventeen and eighteen.
Each institution of secondary education and each public or private institution of post-
secondary education shall, at least annually, before or at the start of enrollment, deliver to
each person who enrolls as a full-time student in such institution a copy of this section and
sections seventeen and eighteen.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 131 of 135
Each institution of secondary education and each public or private institution of post-
secondary education shall file, at least annually, a report with the board of higher education
and, in the case of secondary institutions, the board of education, certifying that such
institution has complied with its responsibility to inform student groups, teams, or
organizations and to notify each full-time student enrolled by it of the provisions of this
section and sections seventeen and eighteen and also certifying that said institution has
adopted a disciplinary policy with regard to the organizers and participants of hazing, and
that such policy has been set forth with appropriate emphasis in the student handbook or
similar means of communicating the institution’s policies to its students. The board of
higher education and, in the case of secondary institutions, the board of education shall
promulgate regulations governing the content and frequency of such reports, and shall
forthwith report to the attorney general any such institution which fails to make such
report.
610 CMR 5.00: Hazing Reporting
5.01: Scope and Purpose
610 CMR 5.00 governs the content and frequency of reports that Massachusetts public and
private institutions of post-secondary education must file with the Board of Higher
Education regarding the distribution and acknowledgment of receipt of copies of the hazing
laws and the adoption by public and private institutions of post-secondary education of a
disciplinary policy with regard to the organizers and participants in hazing activities.
5.02: Definitions
As used in 610 CMR 5.00:
College or University
A public or private institution of higher education chartered, located, offering courses, or
otherwise doing business in the Commonwealth, leading to the award of a degree, or any
educational institution chartered, incorporated, or organized in another state conducting
courses within the Commonwealth available to residents of the Commonwealth leading to
the award of a degree.
Board
Board of Higher Education, a state agency established pursuant to applicable provisions of
M.G.L. c. 15A.
Hazing
As defined in M.G.L. c. 269, s 17.
Public or Private Institutions of Post-Secondary Education or Institution
An institution located within Massachusetts which provides formal instructional programs
with a curriculum designed primarily for students who have completed the requirements
of a high school diploma or equivalent. This includes programs of an academic, vocational
or continuing professional education, degree-granting colleges and universities, and non-
degree-granting institutions.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 132 of 135
Unaffiliated Student Group, Team or Organization
Any group, team or organization that operates on or in conjunction with the campus of a
college or university, but is not under the authority of the college or university.
5.03: Reporting Requirements
Content of Report
Reports required by M.G.L. c. 269, s 19 shall include the following certifications:
That the institution has complied with the responsibility to inform student groups, teams,
or organizations of the provisions of M.G.L. c. 269, ss 17 and 18;
That the institution has notified each full-time student enrolled by the post-secondary
educational institution of the provisions of M.G.L. c. 269, ss 17 and 18;
That the institution has adopted a disciplinary policy with regard to the organizers and
participants of hazing;
That the institution’s disciplinary policy with regard to the organizers and participants of
hazing has been set forth with appropriate emphasis in the student handbook or that a
similar means of communicating the institution’s policies to its students has taken place.
Said report shall be signed by the president or chief executive officer of the public or
private institution of post-secondary education or his or her designee.
The Board may, upon request, furnish a reporting form to the public or private institution
of post-secondary education, or authorize alternative reporting formats, including facsimile
transfer, electronic mail or other formats capable of transmitting the report to the Board’s
designated recipient.
Frequency of Reports
Each public or private institution of post-secondary education shall annually file its
compliance report with the Chancellor of the Board of Higher Education or his designee on
or before July 31 of each year. Said report shall cover the period July through June 30
inclusive. Any public or private institution of post secondary education that requires an
extension of the July 31 reporting deadline shall forward a written request for an extension
to the Chancellor or his designee at least 30 days before July 31 which shall include
justification for the extension and specify the date by which the public or private institution
of post secondary education’s report will be filed. No extension shall be granted beyond
September 1 of the year which the report is due.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 133 of 135
Notification to the Attorney General
The Board shall report to the Attorney General any public or private institution of post-
secondary education that fails to submit report by July 31 of each year or by any date of
extension granted by the Board.
Regulatory Authority
610 CMR 5.00: M.G.L. c. 269, s. 19.
U. Harvard University Rules for Campus Use
Harvard University has established rules for campus use across Harvard. These rules are
available at https://evp.harvard.edu/campus-use-rules.
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 134 of 135
Appendix A: Harvard Law School: The
Well, Harvard University Health Services,
Counseling and Mental Health Services,
and Center for Wellness and Health
Promotion
Harvard Law School: The Well
For more information, please visit: https://hls.harvard.edu/student-life/the-well-health-
and-wellness-at-hls/
Harvard University Health Services (HUHS)
For more information, please visit: https://huhs.harvard.edu/
Counseling and Mental Health Services (CAMHS)
For more information, please visit: https://camhs.huhs.harvard.edu/
Center for Wellness and Health Promotion
For more information, please visit: https://wellness.huhs.harvard.edu/
2024-2025 Handbook of Academic Policies
Page 135 of 135
Appendix B: Emergency and Safety
Information
Emergency Information
See Emergency Information.
Building emergencies should be reported to the Facilities Management Office at 5-5521
during weekday work hours or to 5-5560 during evenings, weekends, and holidays.
Harvard University MessageME
MessageMe is Harvard University’s emergency messaging system. For more information,
please visit: https://messageme.harvard.edu/.
In the event of an emergency or significant disruption in operations, the University will use
MessageMe to quickly distribute critical information to all active Harvard faculty, staff,
students, and other community members who are likely to be on campus.
Harvard University Campus Escort Program (HUCEP)
For more information, please visit: https://www.hupd.harvard.edu/campus-escort-
program.
Evening Van Service (617-495-0400) (fully accessible)
For more information, please visit: https://www.transportation.harvard.edu/shuttle-van-
services/demand-van-service.