1) Broad assessment of insurance industry cybersecurity loss events over
the past decade (20 minutes)
(CIPR)
2) Discuss insurance industry loss events in wider context as well as
ongoing NAIC initiatives and best practices aimed at curbing the
frequency and impact of such cybersecurity loss events (30 minutes)
(Jim Blinn, Zywave)
(Cynthia Amann, Missouri Department of Commerce & Insurance)
3) Cyber modeling landscape and application (30 minutes)
(Rebecca Bole, CyberCube)
(Shaveta Gupta, NAIC CAT COE)
AGENDA
4
Arthur J. Gallagher targeted in class action lawsuit based on 2020 ransomware attack
Chubb hit by a Maze ransomware attack in March 2020
Geico reported in April 2021, customer stolen license numbers possibly used to apply
for fraudulent unemployment benefits
CNA paid $40 million in late March 2021 to hackers
(Source: Insurance Journal, Jan. 5, 2022, https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/2022/01/05/647530.htm)
Alleged Funeral Insurance Services Robocalls Gets Allstate Affiliate National General
Into TCPA Hot Water
(Source: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/tcpaworld-after-dark-alleged-funeral-insurance-services-robocalls-gets-allstate)
Health Insurance Associates agreed to pay $990,000 to resolve claims that it violated
the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) with unsolicited telemarketing calls.
(Source: https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/closed-settlements/health-insurance-associates-telemarketing-calls-990k-class-action-settlement/
CYBER HEADLINES
5
The long list of companies hit by the global MOVEit hack has grown further with
the addition of insurance provider Genworth
, whose millions of customers and
agents combined are affected up to 2.7 million individuals affected.
https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/us/news/cyber/genworth-outlines-massive-hit-from-global-moveit-hack-450435.aspx
Other 2023 high profile incidents:
Managed Care of North America (MCNA) Dental – March data breach that compromised data of almost nine million
patients;
Progressive May, one of its third-party vendors has fallen victim to a data breach that impacted about 347,000
customers;
CareSource May, more than three million customers to have their personal data compromised;
Prudential & New York Life May, more than 345,000 customer accounts were impacted by MOVEit hack;
American Family October cyberattack shutting down IT systems;
MORE CYBER HEADLINES
https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/us/guides/the-insurance-industry-cyber-crime-report-recent-attacks-on-insurance-businesses-
448429.aspx#:~:text=In%20a%20notification%20letter%20dated,personal%20information%20accessed%20by%20hackers
.
6
But what do we know about the objective cybersecurity
risk across the entire insurance industry over time
?
Access and analyze industry recognized proprietary cyber loss
dataset
Merging NAIC data points and survey information to create a
unique modeling set for descriptive and statistical analysis
Share and leverage findings with NAIC regulators
7
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE
MAIN RESULTS
Between 2012 and 2022, over 541 insurance companies
suffered a known cyber loss event, with an average of 233
cyber loss events transpiring each year.
Cyber events potentially impact both market conduct and
financial solvency areas of regulation.
The likelihood of experiencing a malicious cyber
event increases as firm visibility increases.
The likelihood of experiencing a malicious cyber
event increases as firm performance decreases.
[RESULTS ARE PRELIMINARY]
8
Data source: Zywave Data Set (f/k/a Advisen)
Cyber loss events accessed from a variety of sources
Government: SEC, FTC, FCC, Homeland Security, State FOIA requests, Int'l sources
Litigation: Official court records, plaintiff attorney websites, litigation sources
News: Key-word based alerts
Company: S&P, D&B
Timeframe
Events range from 1953 2022
Analysis range from 2012 2022
Lag time from event creation and case updates can be considerable
9
OUR DATA UNIVERSE - SOURCE
HISTORICAL VIEW OF EVENTS - ALL GLOBAL COMPANIES
Total Number of Events: 150,341
Source: Zywave Data Set, 01/26/2023
EVENT YEAR
10
110010
101010
110011
What is being tracked?
Events An event is any risk of financial or physical loss, disruption of services, privacy
violation, or damage to the assets or reputation of an organization through either
a failure
of its information or technology systems, or a malicious act affecting their information or
technology systems
.
Events may result in significant financial loss to or judgments against corporate entities.
Data--
Unintentional
Disclosure
Data
Malicious
Breach
Data
Physically
Lost or
Stolen
IT Configuration,
Implementation
Errors
Privacy
Unauthorized
Contact or
Disclosure
Phishing,
Spoofing,
Social
Engineering
11
OUR DATA UNIVERSE LOSS EVENTS
ISOLATING U.S. INSURANCE COMPANIES
Source: Zywave data set, Jan 26, 2023
NAIC FDR
All U.S.
Insurance
Related*
4,475
events
NAIC
Matched
Insurers
All U.S.
Insurance
Related*
2,050
Zywave
companies
NAIC
Matched
Insurers
541
NAIC
companies
2,566
events
All
U.S.
124,589
events
TIME PERIOD:
2012 - 2022
Zywave ID
FEIN / Name /
Event Description
/State of Domicile
COCODE
*SIC Codes 63 & 64
12
INSURANCE EVENTS OVER TIME (2012-2022)
Source: Zywave data set, Jan. 26, 2023; NAIC FDR; SICCODE.com
n Events= 9,129
n Firms =107,281
n Events= 2,566
n Firms = 7,602
Annual Rate Per Firm:
0.007736
Annual Rate Per Firm:
0.030686
Roughly,
insurance
companies
are 4x more
likely than a
depository
institution to
experience a
cyber event.
13
EVENT FREQUENCY BY STATEMENT TYPE
Source: Zywave data set, Jan 26, 2023
Matched
NAIC
Insurers
n Events=2,566
19%
44%
36%
14
INSURER SECTOR INFLUENCE
Source: Zywave data set, Jan. 26, 2023; NAIC FDR
All Cyber Events n = 2566
Companies w/ Cyber Event n = 526
Total Distinct Companies with Filings
Requested 2012 - 2022 n = 5876
TIME PERIOD:
2012 2022
Proportion of Companies with Cyber Event to Financial Filings Received
15
THIRD-PARTY FINANCIAL IMPACT
Source: Zywave data set, Jan 26, 2023
[140]
[180]
[284]
[207]
[76]
[371]
[317]
[319]
[266]
[211]
[195]
Settlement Amounts
Other Fines & Penalties
Plaintiffs Legal Expenses
16
INSURER TOP 4 EVENT TYPES OVER TIME
Source: Zywave data set, Jan 26, 2023
17
EVENT TYPES: NAIC MATCHED INSURERS
Source: Zywave data set, Jan. 26, 2023
Unintentional Disclosure
Example:
A policyholder ran a
report that should have
only shown their policy
info, but instead included
additional policyholders’
info. Customer sent copy
of report. Impacted over
1,000 policyholders.
Internal -
Organization
Printed Records
Personal
Financial
Identity
Personal
Identity
Information
n = 862
External Other
Internal - TTP
Email
Unknown/Other
Internal -
Employee
Server
Personal Health
Information
Unknown/Other
18
FREQUENCY BY COMPANY: 2012 - 2022
UNINTENTIONAL DISCLOSURE
Source: Zywave data set, Jan 26, 2023
n = 862
19
SEVERITY: 2012 - 2022
UNINTENTIONAL DISCLOSURE
Source: Zywave data set, Jan 26, 2023
% of Class Action Lawsuits: .35%
0% 1
10% 1
25% 1
50% 2
90% 1,563
75% 103
100% 15,000,000
Event Persons
Percentile
Affected
n = 862
Estimated
20
EVENT TYPES: NAIC MATCHED INSURERS
Source: Zywave data set, Jan. 26, 2023
Malicious Breach
Example:
A former employee took
personal information from
company records and sent
it to their laptop to obtain
OTC products from
pharmacy. [54,000+
members potentially
affected. ]
External - Other
Server
Personal
Financial
Identify
Personal
Identity
Information
n = 980
Employee
Criminal Org.
Email
Website
Personal Health
Info
21
FREQUENCY BY COMPANY: 2012 - 2022
MALICIOUS BREACH
Source: Zywave data set, Jan 26, 2023
n = 980
22
SEVERITY: 2012 - 2022
MALICOUS BREACH
Source: Zywave data set, Jan 26, 2023
0% 1
10% 1
25% 2
50% 42
90% 26,179
75% 1,324
100% 11,000,000
Event Persons
Percentile
Affected
% of Class Action Lawsuits: 3.6%
n = 980
23
EVENT TYPES: 2012 - 2022
NAIC INSURERS COMPARED TO FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
Source: Zywave data set, Jan. 26, 2023
U.S. Insurers
Depository Institutions
U.S. Insurer n = 2,566,
98% of Case Types Shown
Depository Institution n = 9,129
99.5% of Case Types Shown
24
Harder to Breach
- Larger IT Budget
& Security
Bigger Payoff
- Larger
quantity of
desirable
information
Relatively Larger Insurer
Lower Payoff
Smaller
quantity of
desirable
information
Easier to
Breach
Smaller IT
Budget &
Security
Relatively Smaller Insurer
25
TYPE OF INSURER TO EXPERIENCE
MALICIOUS CYBER LOSS EVENT
Research question
What types of insurers are more likely to experience a cyber loss
event?
Firm visibility
Age, Size (Total assets), Advertisement expense, Number of states
Performance
Return on Assets (ROA) = Net income / Total assets
Financial health
Leverage = Capital surplus / Total assets
IT budget
Intangible assets (Personal information)
Net premiums written
26
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS DETERMINANTS
OF MALICIOUS CYBER EVENTS
Sample
Includes all insurers that reported total assets greater than
0 in the annual statement from years 2012-2022
49,694 observations
7,219 insurers
Methodology
Malicious cyber event
t
= f(firm characteristics
t-1
)
Malicious cyber event equals 1 if an insurer experienced a
malicious cyber event in year t, and equals 0 otherwise
27
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS DETERMINANTS
OF MALICIOUS CYBER EVENTS
Key findings
Insurers are more likely to experience a cyber event when:
Greater firm visibility (Size, Age, Advertisement expense,
Number of states)
Lower ROA
Health insurer (3% > P&C, Life)
Previous malicious cyber event (0.7%)
Mutual insurers edge out non-mutual (0.3%)
Grows over sample time frame
28
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS DETERMINANTS
OF MALICIOUS CYBER EVENTS
29
Zywave Loss Data Insights
Jim Blinn
Zywave
12/1/2023
Losses: Linking Disparate Sources
Loss
Data
News
Articles
Court
Records
Plaintiff
Lawyers
Government
Websites
FOIA
Requests
Federal Trade
Commission
Office of
Civil Rights
Company
Data
SEC
DoJ
Financial
Records
Cyber
D&O
EPLI
Fiduciary
Liability
Excess
Casualty
Comparison of Loss Types
December 1, 2023
32
Loss Type Insurer Non-Insurer FI All Others Total
Data - Malicious Breach 35.90% 38.46% 42.87% 41.88%
Privacy - Unauthorized Contact or Disclosure 13.63% 38.60% 22.67% 25.26%
Data - Unintentional Disclosure 28.87% 8.21% 14.27% 13.61%
Data - Physically Lost or Stolen 11.91% 4.64% 6.24% 6.11%
Network/Website Disruption 0.84% 2.04% 6.23% 5.32%
Phishing, Spoofing, Social Engineering 4.09% 2.78% 3.23% 3.18%
Privacy - Unauthorized Data Collection 0.49% 0.37% 1.22% 1.05%
IT - Configuration/Implementation Errors 1.15% 0.58% 0.92% 0.87%
Skimming, Physical Tampering 0.00% 2.26% 0.77% 1.01%
IT - Processing Errors 1.21% 0.68% 0.59% 0.62%
Identity - Fraudulent Use/Account Access 1.31% 1.04% 0.58% 0.68%
Undetermined/Other 0.59% 0.35% 0.30% 0.31%
Industrial Controls & Operations 0.02% 0.00% 0.11% 0.09%
Comparison of Actor Types
December 1, 2023
33
Actor Type Insurer Non-Insurer FI All Others Total
External
- Other 40.96% 38.88% 41.03% 40.64%
Internal
- Organization 33.49% 44.87% 33.50% 35.54%
External
- Criminal Organization 5.25% 6.36% 10.80% 9.84%
Internal
- Employee 11.57% 5.44% 8.22% 7.82%
External
- Hacktivist 0.27% 0.86% 2.51% 2.15%
Internal
- Trusted Third Party (TTP) 3.05% 1.07% 0.89% 0.98%
External
- Vendor 3.09% 0.80% 0.66% 0.76%
External
- Nation State 0.12% 0.22% 0.77% 0.65%
External
- Former Employee 1.09% 0.60% 0.60% 0.62%
Internal
- Other 0.54% 0.39% 0.47% 0.45%
External
- Criminal Individual 0.21% 0.33% 0.21% 0.23%
External
- Terrorist 0.04% 0.05% 0.12% 0.11%
Other
0.33% 0.14% 0.21% 0.20%
Comparison of Loss Types
December 1, 2023
34
Cyber Incident Insurer Non-Insurer FI All Others Total
MOVEit Cl0p Ransomware Attack, 2023 56 144 823 1023
Blackbaud Inc. Ransomware Attack, 2020 5 887 892
Heartland Payment Systems, Hacking, 2008 3 657 10 670
Ukraine-Russia Crisis Cyber Warfare, 2022 21 138 159
Insurance Technologies Data Breach, 2021 1 147 2 150
WannaCry Ransomware Attack, 2017 7 134 141
Sabre, Payment Card Data Breach, 2016 5 14 110 129
Connexin Software, Inc Data Breach, 2022 120 120
Luxottica Data Hacking Incident, 2020 106 106
Kronos Private Cloud Ransomware, 2021 4 92 96
Horizon Actuarial Services, Hacking 2021 42 52 94
AmeriCommerce, Data Hacking 2021 87 87
Accellion Unauthorized Access, 2020 3 8 58 69
35
www.cybcube.com
Cyber risk modeling - an insurance industry view
December 2023
www.cybcube.com
Market Position
> 100 (re)insurance clients
20/30 top cyber carriers
9/20 top global reinsurers
> 95% client retention rate
> 66% of global cyber insurance premiums
Mission
Deliver the world’s leading analytics and services to quantify
cyber risk
About CyberCube
37
History
Founded in 2018
Focused solely on cyber risk quantification and analytics
Largest
single investment in cyber risk data and analytics
dedicated multi-functional team (>115)
Regulatory Engagement
Maintain active dialogues with regulators in key markets,
and regularly engage on projects to develop cyber risk
governance frameworks and risk management structures
Partner with rating agencies to develop approaches to
underwriting and rating cyber risk
CyberCube Solutions leveraged
Portfolio Manager
SPoF scenario-class based cyber cat model
Quantify attritional and tail risk
Account Manager
Predictive security score and risk factors
www.cybcube.com
Insurance Industry loss modeling analysis: Carrier Count by Type
38
# of Carriers by Type
Total 4155
Excluded 679
Subtotal 3476
P&C 1960
Health 867
Life 601
Title 48
www.cybcube.com
Insurance Industry loss modeling analysis: 2022 Direct Written Premium by Type
39
Premiums by Carrier Type*
P&C
$1,055B
Life
$967B
Health
$848B
Title
$21B
*excluding N/A, Zero, Negatives
www.cybcube.com
What questions did we tackle?
40
1. Which companies are most vulnerable from a security perspective?
2. Which of the insurer’s technology dependencies are the vector for loss?
3. What types of events are most likely to cause losses across the insurance industry?
4. What is the financial cost of cyber attacks on the US insurance industry?
5. Which companies present the largest risks?
www.cybcube.com
Executive Summary
41
1. Which companies are most vulnerable from a security perspective?
a. Micro-sized insurers (<$10mn premium), on average, have the weakest cyber security postures and are most
vulnerable to loss
b. Large companies, on average, have the best cyber security among insurers
c. The Insurance sector, on average, is below the Financial industry average on cyber security
2. Which of the insurer’s technology dependencies are the vector for loss?
a. Cyber attackers are most likely to access systems via shared technology dependencies such as certificate authorities,
cloud service providers and content management systems
3. What types of events are most likely to cause losses across the insurance industry?
a. Ransomware and Data Theft are the sources of largest loss to the insurance industry
4. What is the financial cost of cyber attacks on the US insurance industry?
a. In any given year, the insurance industry will suffer $434mn in losses. At the 1-in-250 return period, the insurance
industry could suffer losses of $8.3bn
5. Which companies present the largest risks?
a. In a breakdown of individual companies that drive the industry loss, larger insurers contribute most to the loss quantum
www.cybcube.com
P&C
1a. Which companies are the most
vulnerable
from a security perspective?
42
Life
American Mut Life Assn
Alliance Of Transylvanian Saxons
KJZT Family Life
American Farmers & Ranchers Life
Assurity Life Ins Co of NY
Foundation Life Ins Co Of AR
National Family Care Life Ins Co
Western Amer Life Ins Co
Portuguese Fraternal Soc. of Amer
Dakota Capital Life Ins Co
Superior Specialty Ins Co
Farmers & Mechanics Mut
New Mexico Business Ins
United Frontier Mut Ins Co
California Cas Ins Co
Wisconsin Lawyers Mut Ins
Midwest Family Advantage
Peninsula Ind Co
Jet Ins Co
Consumer Specialties Ins
Health
Magna Ins Co
United Hlthcare of AR Inc
ProTec Ins Co
Dignity Care Corp
Optilegra Inc
Ryder Hlth Plan Inc
Solstice Health Ins Co
Momentum Ins Plans Inc
Eon Hlth Inc
Central Mass Hlth LLC
Title
American Eagle Title Ins Co
National Consumer Title Ins Co
Southwest Land Title Ins Co
California Members Title Ins Co
Apex Underwriters Inc
Title Guar & Trust Co
AHP Title Direct Inc
ARIS Title Ins Co
Dakota Homestead Title Ins Co
Conestoga Title Ins Co
- CyberCube’s security scores consider 45 security risk factors, including Open Ports, End-of-Life products, Unpatched
software
- These top-10 vulnerable* companies are all Micro size (<$10mn GwP). Company names obscured below, because…
- ‘Vulnerable’ does not equal ‘Negligent’. Cybersecurity is fast moving and requires resource. The likelihood of being
attacked is a function of cybersecurity, the company’s value as a target and the volume of data/assets to be stolen
* lowest CyberCube security scores
www.cybcube.com
1b. Which segment is the most
vulnerable
from a security perspective?
43
˃ CyberCube Security Score averages show all Financial industry companies
˃ For all insurers, the averages by segment range from 42-48, therefore slightly below average Financial companies
˃ For P&C and Health insurers, two-thirds are below average for all Financials
˃ Life and Title insurers sit around the Financial industry average
˃ Overlaying company size, Large and Medium companies have above average scores. Small are average and Micro are below average
(Least)
100
75
50
25
(Most) 0
LifeP&C Health TitleIndustry-size
Averages
61
56
46
37
46
47
87
2
86
48
6
42
2
84
63% below average
35% above average
57% below average
42% above average
63% below average
36% above average
50% below average
50% above average
87
4
Large
Medium
Small
Micro
Financial Industry
average security
score
www.cybcube.com
2. Which of the insurer’s technology dependencies are main vectors for loss?
44
˃ Cloud Service Provider (Omni)
˃ AWS, Azure, Salesforce
˃ Content Delivery Network Provider
˃ Cloudflare, Akamai, Amazon CloudFront
˃ Certificate Authority
˃ DigiCert, Let’s Encrypt, GoDaddy
˃ Cloud-based Enterprise File Sharing Provider
˃ MS OneDrive/Azure, Google Drive, Apple iCloud
˃ Email Services Provider
˃ MS Exchange, Gmail for Business, Zoho Mail
˃ DNS Provider
˃ Route53, Cloudflare, GoDaddy
˃ Operating System - Server
˃ Ubuntu, Unix, Linux
˃ Content Management System Provider
˃ WordPress. Adobe Experience Manager, HubSpot CMS
˃ E-Commerce Platform
˃ Shopify, Magento, Amazon
Insurer technology dependency groups
- CyberCube loss modeling is
based on Single Points of
Failure (SPoF) technology
dependencies that act as vectors
to cause loss
- We show here the top SPoF
groups for the insurance industry
- Research highlights 4 main
SPoF types as vulnerabilities for
attack: Certificate Authority, File
sharing providers, Email
services providers and Content
Management Systems
www.cybcube.com
3. What type of event(s) can cause the largest losses to the Insurance Industry?
45
Five highest loss scenario classes
Loss type SPoF exploited
Ransomware File Sharing Provider
Data Theft Fund Administrator
Destructive Malware Cloud Services Provider
Ransomware Endpoint Operating System
Data Theft Enterprise Payroll Provider
Five lowest loss scenario classes
Loss type SPoF exploited
Cash Theft Financial Transaction Provider
Data Theft E-Commerce Platform
Ransomware Medical Device Manufacturer
Data Theft Mobile Point of Sale Vendor
Extortion Point of Sale Vendor
www.cybcube.com
168
4. What is the financial cost of cyber attacks on the US insurance industry?
46
Average
Annual
Loss
2.0% or 1-
in-50yr
1.0% or
1-in100yr
0.4% or 1-
in-250yr
0.2% or 1-
in-500yr
120
142 4
1,7381,167 1,387 35
2,4581,585 1,896 54
3,6422,077 2,735 87
4,9173,101 3,876 122
434
LifeP&C Health TitleUS Insurance Industry
Annual
Probability
4,267
5,782
8,284
11,501
Losses shown in $millions.
Individual Life & Health company
contribution to loss is higher
www.cybcube.com
P&C
5. Which companies drive the most losses – on average vs in a cyber catastrophe?
47
Average Annual Loss
State Farm Mut Auto Ins Co
United Specialty Ins Co
State Farm Fire & Cas Co
Nations Ins Co
Federal Ins Co
1-in-250yr cat
State Farm Mut Auto Ins Co
United Specialty Ins Co
State Farm Fire & Cas Co
Nations Ins Co
United Serv Automobile Assn
Life
Average Annual Loss
Health Net Life Ins Co
American Nat Life Ins Co of NY
Globe Life Ins Co of NY
Wysh Life & Hlth Ins Co
Reliance Standard Life Ins Co
1-in-250yr cat
Health Net Life Ins Co
American Nat Life Ins Co of NY
Wysh Life & Hlth Ins Co
Reliance Standard Life Ins Co
Globe Life Ins Co of NY
Health
Average Annual Loss
Pacificare Life & Hlth Ins Co
Clover Ins Co
Golden Security Ins Co
Anthem Ins Co Inc
Cigna Dental Hlth of NC Inc
1-in-250yr cat
Pacificare Life & Hlth Ins Co
Clover Ins Co
Golden Security Ins Co
Anthem Ins Co Inc
Cigna Dental Hlth of NC Inc
Title
Average Annual Loss
Conestoga Title Ins Co
Attorneys Title Guaranty Fund Inc
National Title Ins Of NY Inc
Alliant Natl Title Ins Co Inc
Real Advantage Title Ins Co
1-in-250yr cat
Conestoga Title Ins Co
Alliant Natl Title Ins Co Inc
Attorneys Title Guaranty Fund Inc
National Title Ins Of NY Inc
Real Advantage Title Ins Co
www.cybcube.com
Executive Summary
48
1. Which companies are most vulnerable from a security perspective?
a. Micro-sized insurers (<$10mn premium), on average, have the weakest cyber security postures and are most
vulnerable to loss
b. Large companies, on average, have the best cyber security among insurers
c. The Insurance sector, on average, is below the Financial industry average on cyber security
2. Which of the insurer’s technology dependencies are the vector for loss?
a. Cyber attackers are most likely to access systems via shared technology dependencies such as certificate authorities,
cloud service providers and content management systems
3. What types of events are most likely to cause losses across the insurance industry?
a. Ransomware and Data Theft are the sources of largest loss to the insurance industry
4. What is the financial cost of cyber attacks on the US insurance industry?
a. In any given year, the insurance industry will suffer $434mn in losses. At the 1-in-250 return period, the insurance
industry could suffer losses of $8.3bn
5. Which companies present the largest risks?
a. In a breakdown of individual companies that drive the industry loss, larger insurers contribute most to the loss quantum
www.cybcube.com
Confidential and subject to NDA
49
This document is for general information purpose only and is not and shall not under any
circumstance be construed as legal advice. It is not intended to address all or any specific area of the
topic in this document. Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, the views and opinions
expressed in this document are those of CyberCube’s and are correct as at the date of publication.
Whilst all reasonable care has been taken in the preparation of this document including in ensuring
the accuracy of the content of this document, no liability is accepted by CyberCube and its affiliates
for any loss or damage suffered as a result of reliance on any statement or opinion, or for any error or
omission, or deficiency contained in the document. CyberCube and its affiliates shall not be liable for
any action or decisions made on the basis of the content of this document and accordingly, you are
advised to seek professional and legal advice before you do so. This document and the information
contained herein are CyberCube’s proprietary information and may not be reproduced without
CyberCube’s prior written consent. Nothing herein shall be construed as conferring on you by
implication or otherwise any license or right to use CyberCube’s intellectual property. All CyberCube’s
rights are reserved.
CyberCube Analytics, Inc., 58 Maiden Lane, 3
rd
Floor, San Francisco, 94108
Copyright © 2023 CyberCube Analytics, Inc. All rights reserved
Questions?
Email rebeccab@cybcube.com
www.cybcube.com
Confidential and subject to NDA
Cyber Catastrophe Modeling: Q&A
Rebecca Bole, Shaveta Gupta
50
51
www.cybcube.com
Confidential and subject to NDA
Digital Supply Chain - Single Point of Failure (SPOF) Overview
Single Point of Failure (SPoF)
Signifies the company, service, etc.
within each scenario class that caused
the system failure.
SPoF Intelligence provides information
to better understand your insurance
portfolio and connections by
understanding which single points of
failure an insured relies on
Understand which accounts are
dependent upon a Single Point of
Failure
Dependent
Companies
Single Point of
Failure Technology
Amazon
Web
Services
Abercromb
ie & Fitch
Co.
Pacific
Gas and
Electric
Company
USAA
Real
Estate
Company
SPOF to Company Relationships
Technology
Dependencies
Company
Walmart
Amazon
Web
Services
Shopify
Woo
Commerce
Company to SPOFs Relationships
www.cybcube.com
Scenario Generation: CUBE Framework
52
Our multi-disciplinary expert teams leverage our
proprietary CUBE Framework to quantify the
impacts of cyber attacks across the six
dimensions of an attack:
Attackers
Targets
Objectives
Vulnerabilities
Impact
Consequences
This framework:
Breaks down the technical complexity of a
cyber attack into meaningful and complete
narratives easily understood by both
experts and non-experts.
Provides a consistent methodology to
create representative scenarios with the
greatest combined probability, impact, and
reach which would cause catastrophic loss
accumulation for (re)insurers.
www.cybcube.com
Confidential and subject to NDA
5353
CyberCube Exposure Data
Internal Security Data Expert IntelligenceDigital Supply Chain Historical DataEnterprise Data External Network Data
Catastrophe Model
Bottom-up loss modeling of
systemic events caused by
cascading impacts from single
point of failure technologies
www.cybcube.com
As with Property, 3 factors must be present to create Cyber insurance risk
54
Property Cyber
1. Exposure
Creates aggregation potential
2. Peril
Frequency & severity of events
3. Vulnerability
Susceptibility to peril
www.cybcube.com
Cyber risk shares many qualities with other P&C lines
55
TerrorismCasualty
Property
> Short tail
> Catastrophe-exposed line
> Embrace of catastrophe modeling &
exposure management
> Focus on risk tolerance at the
extreme tail: 1-in-100, 1-in-250
> Social science, not natural science
> Managed within Specialty /
Professional Liability / E&O
> Concern about systemic risk
(theoretically cannot be diversified)
> Pricing volatility & underwriting cycle
> Mean vs median vs mode loss ratio
> Man-made peril
> Sensitive to political environment
> Dynamic & rapidly evolving threat
How cyber risk is like…
56
www.cybcube.com
Confidential and subject to NDA
s
56
www.cybcube.com
Confidential and subject to NDA
57
This document is for general information purpose only and is not and shall not under any
circumstance be construed as legal advice. It is not intended to address all or any specific area of the
topic in this document. Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, the views and opinions
expressed in this document are those of CyberCube’s and are correct as at the date of publication.
Whilst all reasonable care has been taken in the preparation of this document including in ensuring
the accuracy of the content of this document, no liability is accepted by CyberCube and its affiliates
for any loss or damage suffered as a result of reliance on any statement or opinion, or for any error or
omission, or deficiency contained in the document. CyberCube and its affiliates shall not be liable for
any action or decisions made on the basis of the content of this document and accordingly, you are
advised to seek professional and legal advice before you do so. This document and the information
contained herein are CyberCube’s proprietary information and may not be reproduced without
CyberCube’s prior written consent. Nothing herein shall be construed as conferring on you by
implication or otherwise any license or right to use CyberCube’s intellectual property. All CyberCube’s
rights are reserved.
CyberCube Analytics, Inc., 58 Maiden Lane, 3
rd
Floor, San Francisco, 94108
Copyright © 2023 CyberCube Analytics, Inc. All rights reserved
Questions?
Email rebeccab@cybcube.com
58