Crafting a Personal
statement
Andrea Cedfeldt, MD and Leah Reznick, MD
Remember Your
Audience
OHSU P&T Committee is
composed of School of Medicine
Faculty from all departments.
The audience will not necessarily
know the unique aspects of your
niche and so explain things in clear
and basic terms.
Structure
Introduction paragraph
3 body paragraphs put “strongest” domain
first
Teaching
Service
Scholarship
Conclusion
Introduction
One paragraph
Components
Brief background about education, positions, and
length of time in current rank
Describe level of accomplish in the the three areas
and rank that you are applying for
Teaching (satisfactory, substantial, outstanding)
Service (satisfactory, substantial, outstanding)
Scholarship (satisfactory, substantial,
outstanding)
Example
Dear OHSU P&T Committee:
I respectfully request consideration for
promotion to Associate Professor of Medicine.
I believe my contributions to teaching are
substantial, service is satisfactory, and
scholarship are satisfactory. I have been in my
current rank of Assistant Professor for 7 years.
Body of
Letter
Structure should include 3 sections based on
P&T categories.
Strongest category should go first
Length guideline: 1- 1 ½ pages for the strongest
category
+/- ½ page for the other P&T categories
Provide structure to each P&T category with
section headers of scholarship, teaching, and
service
Appendix B- your BFF during P&T
Appendix B- your BFF during P&T
Use the P&T
language in
Personal
Statement
Select which bullets from Appendix B your
work meets
Identify what you have done that fulfills this
criteria for promotion
Can use bullet in personal statement
Provide a narrative and describe your impact
that meets the Appendix B bullet
Remember audience
Explain things that might not be universally
known (research terms, definition of scope of a
national committee, etc.)
Define your abbreviations
Teaching- Outstanding (example)
Teaching (Substantial- 3 points )
In review of the OHSU Guidelines for Promotion and Tenure, I believe that I have met or exceeded the
following representative outstanding contributions to teaching;
Consistently excellent learner, course director, peer evaluations (Appendix B language)
As is evident by my attached Educators Portfolio, I continue to receive high evaluative scores from student, resident, and peer
learners for my high volume of clinical and didactic teaching activities. Student, intern and resident evaluations have included
superlative comments attesting to my teaching skills. I have similarly received consistently high evaluative scores from participants
in the many regional and national workshop presentations I have delivered. I have been invited by the Stanford Faculty
Development Program in Clinical Teaching course directors to be visiting faculty every year since I completed this training as a
trainee in 2005. Course directors and trainees routinely give me verbal and written feedback on my effectiveness at teaching the
feedback session of this course, my success evident by return invitations to Palo Alto x 7 years. Last year, I was invited by faculty
at the Cleveland Clinic and Beth Israel Deaconess medical centers to join the faculty of a national leadership development course,
and received excellent evaluations. A return invitation to be faculty for the course in 2019 is a testament to my success as
perceived by the course directors.
Conclusion
Paragraph
Summarize your statement and re-affirm your
assessment
Example:
In summary, based on the above noted
contributions to teaching (Substantial), service
(Satisfactory), and Scholarship (Satisfactory), I
respectfully submit my application for
consideration of promotion to Associate
Professor of Medicine .
Length
Total length guidelines:
Assistant Associate Professor,
3 pages
AssociateProfesssor, 3-5
pages
Remember reviewers are BUSY
Just the Facts”
Stylistic Recommendations
Explain unusual aspects of your job not evident in your CV or Educators Portfolio
Demonstrate the impact of your work locally, regionally, or nationally with examples
Scholarship explain impact thoroughly and particularly when not in traditional peer
reviewed journals
Use the language of the OHSU Appendix B guidelines to promote understanding for
committee
Each section should justify your assessment and sell the reader on why you meet the
criteria
Things to Avoid
Do not reiterate your CV (instead tell your story by giving highlights and
explaining the importance of your work)
Avoid rambling and regurgitation can use bullet points instead of story if
easier to convey your ideas
Do not double dip (use the same work in 2 categories such as teaching and
service)
Avoid bitterness and politics of the institution and department
Do not assume that the reader knows abbreviations or highly technical terms
Do not be modest but do not oversell your work
Do not submit without a mentor or colleague (someone at the same or higher
faculty rank to that which you are pursuing) reviewing your statement